{"title":"基于QRS-VHis间隔算法优化流出道早心室复合体消融过程。","authors":"Linlin Wang, Lei Wang, Hailei Liu, Nan Wu, Kuan Cheng, Yunlong Wang, Yuegang Wang, Fangyi Xiao, Ruhong Jiang, Xuefeng Zhu, Jingcheng Chen, Jinfeng Wang, Rongbin Yu, Weizhu Ju, Minglong Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2025.02.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The choice between left- and right-sided ablation for outflow tract premature ventricular complexes (OT-PVCs) during procedures remains a topic of ongoing discussion. In this study we aim to elucidate the value of the QRS-V<sub>His</sub> interval in distinguishing between left and right origins in left bundle branch block (LBBB)-type OT-PVCs, thereby optimizing the ablation process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The QRS-V<sub>His</sub> interval was measured in consecutive patients with LBBB-type OT-PVCs. The performance of this interval was compared with traditional electrocardiographic (ECG) algorithms and prospectively validated in a cohort from 8 centers. Based on the interval, we developed an algorithm to assess its efficacy in optimizing the ablation process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 166 patients were enrolled in the development cohort, and 53 patients in the validation cohort. The QRS-V<sub>His</sub> interval demonstrated greater accuracy than ECG algorithms among 153 patients with typical endocardial origins (area under the curve = 0.962). At a cutoff of 30 ms, the QRS-V<sub>His</sub> interval showed a sensitivity of 71.8% and a specificity of 98.2% for identifying left-sided locations. A flowchart was developed based on the QRS-V<sub>His</sub> interval, indicating that a QRS-V<sub>His</sub> value of < 30 ms necessitated left-sided ablation with a 94% likelihood, leading to an 88% success rate. Conversely, when the QRS-V<sub>His</sub> value was ≥ 30 ms, the likelihood of requiring left-sided ablation dropped to only 16%. The accuracy of the flowchart was validated in the independent cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The QRS-V<sub>His</sub> interval is superior for distinguishing between left and right ventricular outflow tract origins in LBBB-type OT-PVCs and has proven valuable in optimizing the intraprocedural process.</p>","PeriodicalId":9555,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the QRS-V<sub>His</sub> Interval-based Algorithm to Optimize the Ablation Process of Outflow Tract Premature Ventricular Complexes.\",\"authors\":\"Linlin Wang, Lei Wang, Hailei Liu, Nan Wu, Kuan Cheng, Yunlong Wang, Yuegang Wang, Fangyi Xiao, Ruhong Jiang, Xuefeng Zhu, Jingcheng Chen, Jinfeng Wang, Rongbin Yu, Weizhu Ju, Minglong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjca.2025.02.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The choice between left- and right-sided ablation for outflow tract premature ventricular complexes (OT-PVCs) during procedures remains a topic of ongoing discussion. In this study we aim to elucidate the value of the QRS-V<sub>His</sub> interval in distinguishing between left and right origins in left bundle branch block (LBBB)-type OT-PVCs, thereby optimizing the ablation process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The QRS-V<sub>His</sub> interval was measured in consecutive patients with LBBB-type OT-PVCs. The performance of this interval was compared with traditional electrocardiographic (ECG) algorithms and prospectively validated in a cohort from 8 centers. Based on the interval, we developed an algorithm to assess its efficacy in optimizing the ablation process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 166 patients were enrolled in the development cohort, and 53 patients in the validation cohort. The QRS-V<sub>His</sub> interval demonstrated greater accuracy than ECG algorithms among 153 patients with typical endocardial origins (area under the curve = 0.962). At a cutoff of 30 ms, the QRS-V<sub>His</sub> interval showed a sensitivity of 71.8% and a specificity of 98.2% for identifying left-sided locations. A flowchart was developed based on the QRS-V<sub>His</sub> interval, indicating that a QRS-V<sub>His</sub> value of < 30 ms necessitated left-sided ablation with a 94% likelihood, leading to an 88% success rate. Conversely, when the QRS-V<sub>His</sub> value was ≥ 30 ms, the likelihood of requiring left-sided ablation dropped to only 16%. The accuracy of the flowchart was validated in the independent cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The QRS-V<sub>His</sub> interval is superior for distinguishing between left and right ventricular outflow tract origins in LBBB-type OT-PVCs and has proven valuable in optimizing the intraprocedural process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2025.02.032\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2025.02.032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using the QRS-VHis Interval-based Algorithm to Optimize the Ablation Process of Outflow Tract Premature Ventricular Complexes.
Background: The choice between left- and right-sided ablation for outflow tract premature ventricular complexes (OT-PVCs) during procedures remains a topic of ongoing discussion. In this study we aim to elucidate the value of the QRS-VHis interval in distinguishing between left and right origins in left bundle branch block (LBBB)-type OT-PVCs, thereby optimizing the ablation process.
Methods: The QRS-VHis interval was measured in consecutive patients with LBBB-type OT-PVCs. The performance of this interval was compared with traditional electrocardiographic (ECG) algorithms and prospectively validated in a cohort from 8 centers. Based on the interval, we developed an algorithm to assess its efficacy in optimizing the ablation process.
Results: A total of 166 patients were enrolled in the development cohort, and 53 patients in the validation cohort. The QRS-VHis interval demonstrated greater accuracy than ECG algorithms among 153 patients with typical endocardial origins (area under the curve = 0.962). At a cutoff of 30 ms, the QRS-VHis interval showed a sensitivity of 71.8% and a specificity of 98.2% for identifying left-sided locations. A flowchart was developed based on the QRS-VHis interval, indicating that a QRS-VHis value of < 30 ms necessitated left-sided ablation with a 94% likelihood, leading to an 88% success rate. Conversely, when the QRS-VHis value was ≥ 30 ms, the likelihood of requiring left-sided ablation dropped to only 16%. The accuracy of the flowchart was validated in the independent cohort.
Conclusions: The QRS-VHis interval is superior for distinguishing between left and right ventricular outflow tract origins in LBBB-type OT-PVCs and has proven valuable in optimizing the intraprocedural process.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Cardiology (CJC) is the official journal of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS). The CJC is a vehicle for the international dissemination of new knowledge in cardiology and cardiovascular science, particularly serving as the major venue for Canadian cardiovascular medicine.