Alberto Montanari, Ana Barros, Thorsten Becker, Marc Bierkens, Sharon Billings, M. Bayani Cardenas, Eric Davidson, Nicolas Gruber, Eileen Hofmann, Mary Hudson, Tissa Illangasekare, Sarah Kang, Marcos Moreno, Francis Nimmo, Larry Paxton, Francois Primeau, Vincent Salters, David Schimel, Bjorn Stevens, Thomas Stocker, Hang Su, Jessica Tierney, Susan Trumbore, Donald Wuebbles, Peter Zeitler, Binzheng Zhang, Xi Zhang
{"title":"感谢我们的2024位评审","authors":"Alberto Montanari, Ana Barros, Thorsten Becker, Marc Bierkens, Sharon Billings, M. Bayani Cardenas, Eric Davidson, Nicolas Gruber, Eileen Hofmann, Mary Hudson, Tissa Illangasekare, Sarah Kang, Marcos Moreno, Francis Nimmo, Larry Paxton, Francois Primeau, Vincent Salters, David Schimel, Bjorn Stevens, Thomas Stocker, Hang Su, Jessica Tierney, Susan Trumbore, Donald Wuebbles, Peter Zeitler, Binzheng Zhang, Xi Zhang","doi":"10.1029/2025AV001711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The editorial team of <i>AGU Advances</i> is grateful for the excellent contributions of our peer reviewers. We rely on their expertise to ensure that the manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo a rigorous, fair, and timely review. Remarkably, during 2024, the journal benefitted from the dedication from 273 reviewers, contributing a total of 338 reviews. These reviewers represented 24 countries. These reviewers provided insights of tremendous and generous value, and they assisted our authors in strengthening the rigor, quality, and presentation of their scholarship. Peer reviewing provides a natural way to engage in continuous learning and professional development. The majority of our reviewers are geoscientists, although we also have interdisciplinary contributions as the scope of Advances covers the extended domain of geosciences, intersecting with economics, communication and computational science, and the social sciences at large. Authors benefit greatly from reviewers' comments and suggestions: already more than 10 years ago, a study reported that most authors (90%) believe that peer review improved the last paper they published (Mulligan et al., 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22798). Although the research and publishing arena is rapidly changing, peer review is considered the optimal standard for evaluating and selecting quality scientific manuscripts for publication, and therefore is highly deserving of our appreciation. We thank all of our peer reviewers for their selfless service and dedication to the scientific community. Your continuing support to the authors and editorial team of <i>AGU Advances</i> is deeply appreciated.</p>","PeriodicalId":100067,"journal":{"name":"AGU Advances","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025AV001711","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thank You to Our 2024 Reviewers\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Montanari, Ana Barros, Thorsten Becker, Marc Bierkens, Sharon Billings, M. Bayani Cardenas, Eric Davidson, Nicolas Gruber, Eileen Hofmann, Mary Hudson, Tissa Illangasekare, Sarah Kang, Marcos Moreno, Francis Nimmo, Larry Paxton, Francois Primeau, Vincent Salters, David Schimel, Bjorn Stevens, Thomas Stocker, Hang Su, Jessica Tierney, Susan Trumbore, Donald Wuebbles, Peter Zeitler, Binzheng Zhang, Xi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2025AV001711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The editorial team of <i>AGU Advances</i> is grateful for the excellent contributions of our peer reviewers. We rely on their expertise to ensure that the manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo a rigorous, fair, and timely review. Remarkably, during 2024, the journal benefitted from the dedication from 273 reviewers, contributing a total of 338 reviews. These reviewers represented 24 countries. These reviewers provided insights of tremendous and generous value, and they assisted our authors in strengthening the rigor, quality, and presentation of their scholarship. Peer reviewing provides a natural way to engage in continuous learning and professional development. The majority of our reviewers are geoscientists, although we also have interdisciplinary contributions as the scope of Advances covers the extended domain of geosciences, intersecting with economics, communication and computational science, and the social sciences at large. Authors benefit greatly from reviewers' comments and suggestions: already more than 10 years ago, a study reported that most authors (90%) believe that peer review improved the last paper they published (Mulligan et al., 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22798). Although the research and publishing arena is rapidly changing, peer review is considered the optimal standard for evaluating and selecting quality scientific manuscripts for publication, and therefore is highly deserving of our appreciation. We thank all of our peer reviewers for their selfless service and dedication to the scientific community. Your continuing support to the authors and editorial team of <i>AGU Advances</i> is deeply appreciated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AGU Advances\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025AV001711\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AGU Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025AV001711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AGU Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025AV001711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
AGU Advances的编辑团队非常感谢同行审稿人的杰出贡献。我们依靠他们的专业知识来确保提交给期刊的手稿经过严格、公平和及时的审查。值得注意的是,在2024年期间,该杂志受益于273名审稿人的奉献精神,总共贡献了338篇审稿。这些审稿人来自24个国家。这些审稿人提供了巨大而慷慨的见解,他们帮助我们的作者加强了学术研究的严谨性、质量和表现。同行评议为持续学习和专业发展提供了一种自然的方式。我们的大多数审稿人是地球科学家,尽管我们也有跨学科的贡献,因为《进展》的范围涵盖了地球科学的扩展领域,与经济学、通信和计算科学以及整个社会科学交叉。作者从审稿人的评论和建议中受益匪浅:早在10多年前,一项研究就报告称,大多数作者(90%)认为同行评议改善了他们发表的上一篇论文(Mulligan et al., 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22798)。虽然研究和出版领域正在迅速变化,但同行评议被认为是评估和选择优质科学论文发表的最佳标准,因此非常值得我们赞赏。我们感谢所有同行审稿人对科学界的无私服务和奉献。非常感谢您对AGU Advances的作者和编辑团队的持续支持。
The editorial team of AGU Advances is grateful for the excellent contributions of our peer reviewers. We rely on their expertise to ensure that the manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo a rigorous, fair, and timely review. Remarkably, during 2024, the journal benefitted from the dedication from 273 reviewers, contributing a total of 338 reviews. These reviewers represented 24 countries. These reviewers provided insights of tremendous and generous value, and they assisted our authors in strengthening the rigor, quality, and presentation of their scholarship. Peer reviewing provides a natural way to engage in continuous learning and professional development. The majority of our reviewers are geoscientists, although we also have interdisciplinary contributions as the scope of Advances covers the extended domain of geosciences, intersecting with economics, communication and computational science, and the social sciences at large. Authors benefit greatly from reviewers' comments and suggestions: already more than 10 years ago, a study reported that most authors (90%) believe that peer review improved the last paper they published (Mulligan et al., 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22798). Although the research and publishing arena is rapidly changing, peer review is considered the optimal standard for evaluating and selecting quality scientific manuscripts for publication, and therefore is highly deserving of our appreciation. We thank all of our peer reviewers for their selfless service and dedication to the scientific community. Your continuing support to the authors and editorial team of AGU Advances is deeply appreciated.