Qiusheng Wang, Songnan Qiu, Hong Zheng, Ruitao Zhang
{"title":"对“利用流动性指标预测粘土不排水抗剪强度”评论的回应","authors":"Qiusheng Wang, Songnan Qiu, Hong Zheng, Ruitao Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s11440-025-02540-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>O’Kelly et al. critique the Wang et al. undrained shear strength prediction model paper in terms of its utility and accuracy. Both criticisms suffer from the miscomprehension of the model comparison method. Utility of the three-parameter liquidity index (<i>I</i><sub><i>L</i></sub>)—undrained shear strength (<i>S</i><sub><i>u</i></sub>) models has been enhanced through optimizing some empirical equation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 3","pages":"1499 - 1501"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to Comment on “Undrained shear strength prediction of clays using liquidity index”\",\"authors\":\"Qiusheng Wang, Songnan Qiu, Hong Zheng, Ruitao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11440-025-02540-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>O’Kelly et al. critique the Wang et al. undrained shear strength prediction model paper in terms of its utility and accuracy. Both criticisms suffer from the miscomprehension of the model comparison method. Utility of the three-parameter liquidity index (<i>I</i><sub><i>L</i></sub>)—undrained shear strength (<i>S</i><sub><i>u</i></sub>) models has been enhanced through optimizing some empirical equation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Geotechnica\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"1499 - 1501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Geotechnica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02540-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02540-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
O 'Kelly等人对Wang等人的不排水抗剪强度预测模型论文的实用性和准确性提出了批评。这两种批评都源于对模型比较方法的误解。通过对一些经验方程的优化,增强了三参数流动性指数-不排水抗剪强度模型的实用性。
Response to Comment on “Undrained shear strength prediction of clays using liquidity index”
O’Kelly et al. critique the Wang et al. undrained shear strength prediction model paper in terms of its utility and accuracy. Both criticisms suffer from the miscomprehension of the model comparison method. Utility of the three-parameter liquidity index (IL)—undrained shear strength (Su) models has been enhanced through optimizing some empirical equation.
期刊介绍:
Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.