Andrew J. Brenner, Toral Patel, Ande Bao, William T. Phillips, Joel E. Michalek, Michael Youssef, Jeffrey S. Weinberg, Carlos Kamiya Matsuoka, Marc H. Hedrick, Norman LaFrance, Melissa Moore, John R. Floyd
{"title":"对流增强输送铼(186Re) Obisbemeda (186RNL)治疗复发性胶质瘤:一项多中心、单臂、1期临床试验","authors":"Andrew J. Brenner, Toral Patel, Ande Bao, William T. Phillips, Joel E. Michalek, Michael Youssef, Jeffrey S. Weinberg, Carlos Kamiya Matsuoka, Marc H. Hedrick, Norman LaFrance, Melissa Moore, John R. Floyd","doi":"10.1038/s41467-025-57263-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rhenium (<sup>186</sup>Re) Obisbemeda (<sup>186</sup>RNL), chelated-<sup>186</sup>Re encapsulated in nanoliposomes and delivered to brain tumors via convection enhanced delivery (CED), was evaluated in a Phase 1 dose escalation trial (NCT01906385). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability, dose distribution, the overall response rate (ORR), disease-specific progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). 21 patients received up to 22.3 mCi <sup>186</sup>RNL over 6 dosing cohorts. Most adverse events (AEs) were unrelated to <sup>186</sup>RNL and the MTD was not reached. Although not predefined outcomes, the mOS and mPFS were 11 and 4 months, respectively, and found to correlate with radiation absorbed dose to the tumor and percent tumor treated. When dichotomized by absorbed dose of 100 Gy, the mOS and mPFS were 17 months and 6 months, respectively, for >100 Gy, compared to 6 (mOS) and 2 (mPFS) months, respectively, for <100 Gy. For ORR, 57.1% exhibited stable disease (SD), 4.8% partial response, and 38.1% progressive disease. Overall, patients received radiation absorbed doses without significant toxicity higher than possible with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and demonstrated mOS beyond standard of care for recurrent glioblastoma (~8 months).</p>","PeriodicalId":19066,"journal":{"name":"Nature Communications","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convection enhanced delivery of Rhenium (186Re) Obisbemeda (186RNL) in recurrent glioma: a multicenter, single arm, phase 1 clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J. Brenner, Toral Patel, Ande Bao, William T. Phillips, Joel E. Michalek, Michael Youssef, Jeffrey S. Weinberg, Carlos Kamiya Matsuoka, Marc H. Hedrick, Norman LaFrance, Melissa Moore, John R. Floyd\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41467-025-57263-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Rhenium (<sup>186</sup>Re) Obisbemeda (<sup>186</sup>RNL), chelated-<sup>186</sup>Re encapsulated in nanoliposomes and delivered to brain tumors via convection enhanced delivery (CED), was evaluated in a Phase 1 dose escalation trial (NCT01906385). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability, dose distribution, the overall response rate (ORR), disease-specific progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). 21 patients received up to 22.3 mCi <sup>186</sup>RNL over 6 dosing cohorts. Most adverse events (AEs) were unrelated to <sup>186</sup>RNL and the MTD was not reached. Although not predefined outcomes, the mOS and mPFS were 11 and 4 months, respectively, and found to correlate with radiation absorbed dose to the tumor and percent tumor treated. When dichotomized by absorbed dose of 100 Gy, the mOS and mPFS were 17 months and 6 months, respectively, for >100 Gy, compared to 6 (mOS) and 2 (mPFS) months, respectively, for <100 Gy. For ORR, 57.1% exhibited stable disease (SD), 4.8% partial response, and 38.1% progressive disease. Overall, patients received radiation absorbed doses without significant toxicity higher than possible with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and demonstrated mOS beyond standard of care for recurrent glioblastoma (~8 months).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Communications\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57263-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Communications","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57263-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Convection enhanced delivery of Rhenium (186Re) Obisbemeda (186RNL) in recurrent glioma: a multicenter, single arm, phase 1 clinical trial
Rhenium (186Re) Obisbemeda (186RNL), chelated-186Re encapsulated in nanoliposomes and delivered to brain tumors via convection enhanced delivery (CED), was evaluated in a Phase 1 dose escalation trial (NCT01906385). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability, dose distribution, the overall response rate (ORR), disease-specific progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). 21 patients received up to 22.3 mCi 186RNL over 6 dosing cohorts. Most adverse events (AEs) were unrelated to 186RNL and the MTD was not reached. Although not predefined outcomes, the mOS and mPFS were 11 and 4 months, respectively, and found to correlate with radiation absorbed dose to the tumor and percent tumor treated. When dichotomized by absorbed dose of 100 Gy, the mOS and mPFS were 17 months and 6 months, respectively, for >100 Gy, compared to 6 (mOS) and 2 (mPFS) months, respectively, for <100 Gy. For ORR, 57.1% exhibited stable disease (SD), 4.8% partial response, and 38.1% progressive disease. Overall, patients received radiation absorbed doses without significant toxicity higher than possible with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and demonstrated mOS beyond standard of care for recurrent glioblastoma (~8 months).
期刊介绍:
Nature Communications, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research spanning all areas of the natural sciences. Papers featured in the journal showcase significant advances relevant to specialists in each respective field. With a 2-year impact factor of 16.6 (2022) and a median time of 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision, Nature Communications is committed to rapid dissemination of research findings. As a multidisciplinary journal, it welcomes contributions from biological, health, physical, chemical, Earth, social, mathematical, applied, and engineering sciences, aiming to highlight important breakthroughs within each domain.