对流增强输送铼(186Re) Obisbemeda (186RNL)治疗复发性胶质瘤:一项多中心、单臂、1期临床试验

IF 15.7 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Andrew J. Brenner, Toral Patel, Ande Bao, William T. Phillips, Joel E. Michalek, Michael Youssef, Jeffrey S. Weinberg, Carlos Kamiya Matsuoka, Marc H. Hedrick, Norman LaFrance, Melissa Moore, John R. Floyd
{"title":"对流增强输送铼(186Re) Obisbemeda (186RNL)治疗复发性胶质瘤:一项多中心、单臂、1期临床试验","authors":"Andrew J. Brenner, Toral Patel, Ande Bao, William T. Phillips, Joel E. Michalek, Michael Youssef, Jeffrey S. Weinberg, Carlos Kamiya Matsuoka, Marc H. Hedrick, Norman LaFrance, Melissa Moore, John R. Floyd","doi":"10.1038/s41467-025-57263-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rhenium (<sup>186</sup>Re) Obisbemeda (<sup>186</sup>RNL), chelated-<sup>186</sup>Re encapsulated in nanoliposomes and delivered to brain tumors via convection enhanced delivery (CED), was evaluated in a Phase 1 dose escalation trial (NCT01906385). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability, dose distribution, the overall response rate (ORR), disease-specific progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). 21 patients received up to 22.3 mCi <sup>186</sup>RNL over 6 dosing cohorts. Most adverse events (AEs) were unrelated to <sup>186</sup>RNL and the MTD was not reached. Although not predefined outcomes, the mOS and mPFS were 11 and 4 months, respectively, and found to correlate with radiation absorbed dose to the tumor and percent tumor treated. When dichotomized by absorbed dose of 100 Gy, the mOS and mPFS were 17 months and 6 months, respectively, for &gt;100 Gy, compared to 6 (mOS) and 2 (mPFS) months, respectively, for &lt;100 Gy. For ORR, 57.1% exhibited stable disease (SD), 4.8% partial response, and 38.1% progressive disease. Overall, patients received radiation absorbed doses without significant toxicity higher than possible with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and demonstrated mOS beyond standard of care for recurrent glioblastoma (~8 months).</p>","PeriodicalId":19066,"journal":{"name":"Nature Communications","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convection enhanced delivery of Rhenium (186Re) Obisbemeda (186RNL) in recurrent glioma: a multicenter, single arm, phase 1 clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J. Brenner, Toral Patel, Ande Bao, William T. Phillips, Joel E. Michalek, Michael Youssef, Jeffrey S. Weinberg, Carlos Kamiya Matsuoka, Marc H. Hedrick, Norman LaFrance, Melissa Moore, John R. Floyd\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41467-025-57263-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Rhenium (<sup>186</sup>Re) Obisbemeda (<sup>186</sup>RNL), chelated-<sup>186</sup>Re encapsulated in nanoliposomes and delivered to brain tumors via convection enhanced delivery (CED), was evaluated in a Phase 1 dose escalation trial (NCT01906385). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability, dose distribution, the overall response rate (ORR), disease-specific progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). 21 patients received up to 22.3 mCi <sup>186</sup>RNL over 6 dosing cohorts. Most adverse events (AEs) were unrelated to <sup>186</sup>RNL and the MTD was not reached. Although not predefined outcomes, the mOS and mPFS were 11 and 4 months, respectively, and found to correlate with radiation absorbed dose to the tumor and percent tumor treated. When dichotomized by absorbed dose of 100 Gy, the mOS and mPFS were 17 months and 6 months, respectively, for &gt;100 Gy, compared to 6 (mOS) and 2 (mPFS) months, respectively, for &lt;100 Gy. For ORR, 57.1% exhibited stable disease (SD), 4.8% partial response, and 38.1% progressive disease. Overall, patients received radiation absorbed doses without significant toxicity higher than possible with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and demonstrated mOS beyond standard of care for recurrent glioblastoma (~8 months).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Communications\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57263-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Communications","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57263-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

铼(186Re) Obisbemeda (186RNL),螯合-186Re包裹在纳米脂体中,通过对流增强递送(CED)递送到脑肿瘤,在1期剂量增加试验(NCT01906385)中进行了评估。主要目的是确定最大耐受剂量(MTD)。次要目标包括安全性和耐受性、剂量分布、总缓解率(ORR)、疾病特异性无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。21名患者在6个给药队列中接受了高达22.3 mCi 186RNL。大多数不良事件(ae)与186RNL无关,未达到MTD。虽然没有预先确定的结果,但mOS和mPFS分别为11个月和4个月,并且发现与肿瘤的辐射吸收剂量和肿瘤治疗百分比相关。以100 Gy的吸收剂量分为两组时,100 Gy组的最大生存期和最短生存期分别为17个月和6个月,而100 Gy组的最长生存期和最短生存期分别为6个月和2个月。对于ORR, 57.1%表现为疾病稳定(SD), 4.8%表现为部分缓解,38.1%表现为疾病进展。总的来说,患者接受的辐射吸收剂量没有明显的毒性,可能高于外部束放射治疗(EBRT),并且显示出复发性胶质母细胞瘤(~8个月)的mOS超出标准护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Convection enhanced delivery of Rhenium (186Re) Obisbemeda (186RNL) in recurrent glioma: a multicenter, single arm, phase 1 clinical trial

Convection enhanced delivery of Rhenium (186Re) Obisbemeda (186RNL) in recurrent glioma: a multicenter, single arm, phase 1 clinical trial

Rhenium (186Re) Obisbemeda (186RNL), chelated-186Re encapsulated in nanoliposomes and delivered to brain tumors via convection enhanced delivery (CED), was evaluated in a Phase 1 dose escalation trial (NCT01906385). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability, dose distribution, the overall response rate (ORR), disease-specific progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). 21 patients received up to 22.3 mCi 186RNL over 6 dosing cohorts. Most adverse events (AEs) were unrelated to 186RNL and the MTD was not reached. Although not predefined outcomes, the mOS and mPFS were 11 and 4 months, respectively, and found to correlate with radiation absorbed dose to the tumor and percent tumor treated. When dichotomized by absorbed dose of 100 Gy, the mOS and mPFS were 17 months and 6 months, respectively, for >100 Gy, compared to 6 (mOS) and 2 (mPFS) months, respectively, for <100 Gy. For ORR, 57.1% exhibited stable disease (SD), 4.8% partial response, and 38.1% progressive disease. Overall, patients received radiation absorbed doses without significant toxicity higher than possible with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and demonstrated mOS beyond standard of care for recurrent glioblastoma (~8 months).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Communications
Nature Communications Biological Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
24.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
6928
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: Nature Communications, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research spanning all areas of the natural sciences. Papers featured in the journal showcase significant advances relevant to specialists in each respective field. With a 2-year impact factor of 16.6 (2022) and a median time of 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision, Nature Communications is committed to rapid dissemination of research findings. As a multidisciplinary journal, it welcomes contributions from biological, health, physical, chemical, Earth, social, mathematical, applied, and engineering sciences, aiming to highlight important breakthroughs within each domain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信