Nicolas Alaux, Bernhard Steubing, Guillaume Habert, Marcella Ruschi Mendes Saade, Alexander Passer
{"title":"奥地利建筑库存的未来生命周期温室气体排放情景:系统方法","authors":"Nicolas Alaux, Bernhard Steubing, Guillaume Habert, Marcella Ruschi Mendes Saade, Alexander Passer","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c12138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building stock modeling can be used to identify trajectories that do not exceed the remaining carbon budget and support science-based pathways. A systematic approach is used from the field of prospective life-cycle assessment, which is based on systems thinking, to develop scenarios for the Austrian building stock that consider life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions. The influential parameters of the model are identified; their interactions are classified; quantitative future assumptions are adopted; and five scenario narratives are created. A maximum emission reduction of 90% from 2023 to 2050 is revealed. In comparison, leaving current policies in place would lead to a trajectory that reduces emissions by only 66%. Three additional scenarios achieve emission reductions between 84 and 86% by 2050, which may be compatible with the 2 °C carbon budget using an equal-per-capita approach. These scenarios represent different societal choices based on ambitious sufficiency (e.g., behavioral change), technological measures (e.g., a change in the industry), or both, with less effort from all actors. To ensure that Austria contributes to staying within the remaining carbon budget, policy makers are urged to systematically and quickly incorporate sufficiency into their policies and enable the necessary investments in carbon dioxide removal technologies.","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"12 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Future Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emission Scenarios for the Austrian Building Stock: A Systematic Approach\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Alaux, Bernhard Steubing, Guillaume Habert, Marcella Ruschi Mendes Saade, Alexander Passer\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.4c12138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Building stock modeling can be used to identify trajectories that do not exceed the remaining carbon budget and support science-based pathways. A systematic approach is used from the field of prospective life-cycle assessment, which is based on systems thinking, to develop scenarios for the Austrian building stock that consider life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions. The influential parameters of the model are identified; their interactions are classified; quantitative future assumptions are adopted; and five scenario narratives are created. A maximum emission reduction of 90% from 2023 to 2050 is revealed. In comparison, leaving current policies in place would lead to a trajectory that reduces emissions by only 66%. Three additional scenarios achieve emission reductions between 84 and 86% by 2050, which may be compatible with the 2 °C carbon budget using an equal-per-capita approach. These scenarios represent different societal choices based on ambitious sufficiency (e.g., behavioral change), technological measures (e.g., a change in the industry), or both, with less effort from all actors. To ensure that Austria contributes to staying within the remaining carbon budget, policy makers are urged to systematically and quickly incorporate sufficiency into their policies and enable the necessary investments in carbon dioxide removal technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"12 1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c12138\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c12138","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Future Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emission Scenarios for the Austrian Building Stock: A Systematic Approach
Building stock modeling can be used to identify trajectories that do not exceed the remaining carbon budget and support science-based pathways. A systematic approach is used from the field of prospective life-cycle assessment, which is based on systems thinking, to develop scenarios for the Austrian building stock that consider life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions. The influential parameters of the model are identified; their interactions are classified; quantitative future assumptions are adopted; and five scenario narratives are created. A maximum emission reduction of 90% from 2023 to 2050 is revealed. In comparison, leaving current policies in place would lead to a trajectory that reduces emissions by only 66%. Three additional scenarios achieve emission reductions between 84 and 86% by 2050, which may be compatible with the 2 °C carbon budget using an equal-per-capita approach. These scenarios represent different societal choices based on ambitious sufficiency (e.g., behavioral change), technological measures (e.g., a change in the industry), or both, with less effort from all actors. To ensure that Austria contributes to staying within the remaining carbon budget, policy makers are urged to systematically and quickly incorporate sufficiency into their policies and enable the necessary investments in carbon dioxide removal technologies.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences.
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.