三种生物陶瓷密封剂浸泡在模拟体液中采用密封剂为基础的密封方法的密封能力。

Rahul Singhal, Meenu G Singla, Palak Wahi, Prashant Bhasin, Ashima Garg, Divya Nangia
{"title":"三种生物陶瓷密封剂浸泡在模拟体液中采用密封剂为基础的密封方法的密封能力。","authors":"Rahul Singhal, Meenu G Singla, Palak Wahi, Prashant Bhasin, Ashima Garg, Divya Nangia","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_605_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate and compare the apical sealing ability of three bioceramic sealers, i.e., BioRoot RCS, CeraSeal, and Bio-C sealer, using sealer-based obturation method after immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Eighty-eight extracted single-rooted mandibular premolars with mature apices and straight root canals were selected. Teeth were decoronated at 12 mm length from the apex. They were divided into 4 groups according to the sealer used (<i>n</i> = 22), i.e., control group (Group 1) - AH Plus (obturated using warm vertical compaction [WVC] technique) and experimental groups - Group 2 (BioRoot RCS), Group 3 (CeraSeal), and Group 4 (Bio-C sealer) (obturated using single-cone technique). Specimens in each group were further divided into two subgroups (<i>n</i> = 11) - Subgroup 1 (evaluation after 48 h) and Subgroup 2 (evaluation after immersion in SBF for 30 days). A dye penetration test was used for microleakage analysis using a stereomicroscope (10×). The collected data were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 48 h, the control group showed the least microleakage, and the difference was statistically significant compared to all experimental groups. After immersion in SBF for 30 days, no significant difference in microleakage was seen among all the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sealing ability of the bioceramic sealers with single-cone obturation when exposed to the SBF improved significantly after 30 days and was comparable to AH Plus using the WVC obturation technique. Thus, single-cone obturation with bioceramic sealers can be considered a viable alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 2","pages":"199-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sealing ability of three bioceramic sealers using sealer-based obturation method after immersion in simulated body fluid.\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Singhal, Meenu G Singla, Palak Wahi, Prashant Bhasin, Ashima Garg, Divya Nangia\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_605_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate and compare the apical sealing ability of three bioceramic sealers, i.e., BioRoot RCS, CeraSeal, and Bio-C sealer, using sealer-based obturation method after immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Eighty-eight extracted single-rooted mandibular premolars with mature apices and straight root canals were selected. Teeth were decoronated at 12 mm length from the apex. They were divided into 4 groups according to the sealer used (<i>n</i> = 22), i.e., control group (Group 1) - AH Plus (obturated using warm vertical compaction [WVC] technique) and experimental groups - Group 2 (BioRoot RCS), Group 3 (CeraSeal), and Group 4 (Bio-C sealer) (obturated using single-cone technique). Specimens in each group were further divided into two subgroups (<i>n</i> = 11) - Subgroup 1 (evaluation after 48 h) and Subgroup 2 (evaluation after immersion in SBF for 30 days). A dye penetration test was used for microleakage analysis using a stereomicroscope (10×). The collected data were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 48 h, the control group showed the least microleakage, and the difference was statistically significant compared to all experimental groups. After immersion in SBF for 30 days, no significant difference in microleakage was seen among all the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sealing ability of the bioceramic sealers with single-cone obturation when exposed to the SBF improved significantly after 30 days and was comparable to AH Plus using the WVC obturation technique. Thus, single-cone obturation with bioceramic sealers can be considered a viable alternative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"199-203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878681/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_605_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_605_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究BioRoot RCS、CeraSeal和Bio-C三种生物陶瓷封口剂浸泡在模拟体液(SBF)中,采用基于封口剂的封闭方法,对其根尖密封能力进行评价和比较。方法:选择88颗拔除的尖牙成熟、根管直的单根下颌前磨牙。牙距先端12毫米长。根据所使用的封闭剂分为4组(n = 22),即对照组(1组)- AH Plus(使用温垂直压实[WVC]技术封闭)和实验组- 2组(BioRoot RCS), 3组(CeraSeal)和4组(Bio-C密封剂)(使用单锥技术封闭)。每组标本进一步分为2个亚组(n = 11)——亚组1 (48 h后评价)和亚组2(浸泡在SBF中30 d后评价)。采用立体显微镜(10倍)染料渗透试验进行微渗漏分析。对收集到的数据进行统计分析。结果:48 h后,对照组微漏最小,与各实验组比较差异有统计学意义。在SBF中浸泡30天后,各组间微渗漏无显著差异。结论:单锥封闭生物陶瓷封闭剂暴露于SBF后30天的封闭能力显著提高,与使用WVC封闭技术的AH Plus相当。因此,单锥封闭生物陶瓷密封剂可以被认为是一个可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sealing ability of three bioceramic sealers using sealer-based obturation method after immersion in simulated body fluid.

Aim: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the apical sealing ability of three bioceramic sealers, i.e., BioRoot RCS, CeraSeal, and Bio-C sealer, using sealer-based obturation method after immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF).

Methodology: Eighty-eight extracted single-rooted mandibular premolars with mature apices and straight root canals were selected. Teeth were decoronated at 12 mm length from the apex. They were divided into 4 groups according to the sealer used (n = 22), i.e., control group (Group 1) - AH Plus (obturated using warm vertical compaction [WVC] technique) and experimental groups - Group 2 (BioRoot RCS), Group 3 (CeraSeal), and Group 4 (Bio-C sealer) (obturated using single-cone technique). Specimens in each group were further divided into two subgroups (n = 11) - Subgroup 1 (evaluation after 48 h) and Subgroup 2 (evaluation after immersion in SBF for 30 days). A dye penetration test was used for microleakage analysis using a stereomicroscope (10×). The collected data were statistically analyzed.

Results: After 48 h, the control group showed the least microleakage, and the difference was statistically significant compared to all experimental groups. After immersion in SBF for 30 days, no significant difference in microleakage was seen among all the groups.

Conclusion: The sealing ability of the bioceramic sealers with single-cone obturation when exposed to the SBF improved significantly after 30 days and was comparable to AH Plus using the WVC obturation technique. Thus, single-cone obturation with bioceramic sealers can be considered a viable alternative.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信