使用三种器械回收系统去除分离器械后对垂直根断裂阻力的比较评估:一项体外研究。

Wendy Maria Vianney Lobo, Abrar Sayed, Kishor Sapkale, Manoj Ramugade, Ana Cristina Mejia Benavides
{"title":"使用三种器械回收系统去除分离器械后对垂直根断裂阻力的比较评估:一项体外研究。","authors":"Wendy Maria Vianney Lobo, Abrar Sayed, Kishor Sapkale, Manoj Ramugade, Ana Cristina Mejia Benavides","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_750_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Separated instruments have been retrieved from root canals using different systems of instruments. However, it has been a common observation that usage of available retrieval systems may weaken the roots of teeth making them prone to fracture and subsequent failure of the treatment as a whole. Hence, the following study was conducted to evaluate and compare the resistance to vertical root fracture after retrieval of separated instruments from the root canal using Ultrasonic U Files, Ultrasonic Tip (Acteon Endo Success ET25 Retreatment Tip), or the Endo Rescue System under magnification of the dental operating microscope.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-two moderately curved mesiobuccal roots of extracted decoronated mandibular first molar teeth were hemisectioned to standardize them to a length of 15 mm each. Following biomechanical preparation, 4-mm length ProTaper gold rotary finishing files F2 were intentionally separated in the middle third of the mesiobuccal root canal and verified radiographically. The samples were then randomly divided into three groups, and retrieval of the separated instrument was performed using the Ultrasonic U files, Ultrasonic ET25 Retreatment tip, or Endo Rescue System, respectively. After retrieval of the separated instruments, the samples were subjected to testing for vertical root fracture resistance using a universal testing machine with an accuracy of ± 1%. The data collected from all the samples were then subjected to statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Ultrasonic U files (Group A) showed the highest vertical root fracture resistance, with a statistically significant difference from the samples treated with ET 25 Ultrasonic retreatment tips(Group B). No significant differences were observed between Group A and C or Group B and Endo Rescue System (Group C) (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Summary and conclusion: </strong>It was observed that Ultrasonic U files offer the least reduction in the vertical root fracture resistance after removal of separated instruments followed by the Endo Rescue system and then the ultrasonic ET25 retreatment tips. While no single instrument retrieval system is universally suitable for all situations due to various factors such as root anatomy, instrument type, location, size, pulpal status, and operator skill, clinicians should determine the treatment protocol by carefully considering the tooth's future prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 2","pages":"182-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative evaluation of the resistance to vertical root fracture after removal of separated instruments using three instrument retrieval systems: An <i>in vitro</i> study.\",\"authors\":\"Wendy Maria Vianney Lobo, Abrar Sayed, Kishor Sapkale, Manoj Ramugade, Ana Cristina Mejia Benavides\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_750_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Separated instruments have been retrieved from root canals using different systems of instruments. However, it has been a common observation that usage of available retrieval systems may weaken the roots of teeth making them prone to fracture and subsequent failure of the treatment as a whole. Hence, the following study was conducted to evaluate and compare the resistance to vertical root fracture after retrieval of separated instruments from the root canal using Ultrasonic U Files, Ultrasonic Tip (Acteon Endo Success ET25 Retreatment Tip), or the Endo Rescue System under magnification of the dental operating microscope.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-two moderately curved mesiobuccal roots of extracted decoronated mandibular first molar teeth were hemisectioned to standardize them to a length of 15 mm each. Following biomechanical preparation, 4-mm length ProTaper gold rotary finishing files F2 were intentionally separated in the middle third of the mesiobuccal root canal and verified radiographically. The samples were then randomly divided into three groups, and retrieval of the separated instrument was performed using the Ultrasonic U files, Ultrasonic ET25 Retreatment tip, or Endo Rescue System, respectively. After retrieval of the separated instruments, the samples were subjected to testing for vertical root fracture resistance using a universal testing machine with an accuracy of ± 1%. The data collected from all the samples were then subjected to statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Ultrasonic U files (Group A) showed the highest vertical root fracture resistance, with a statistically significant difference from the samples treated with ET 25 Ultrasonic retreatment tips(Group B). No significant differences were observed between Group A and C or Group B and Endo Rescue System (Group C) (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Summary and conclusion: </strong>It was observed that Ultrasonic U files offer the least reduction in the vertical root fracture resistance after removal of separated instruments followed by the Endo Rescue system and then the ultrasonic ET25 retreatment tips. While no single instrument retrieval system is universally suitable for all situations due to various factors such as root anatomy, instrument type, location, size, pulpal status, and operator skill, clinicians should determine the treatment protocol by carefully considering the tooth's future prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"182-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878684/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_750_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_750_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:分离的器械使用不同的器械系统从根管中取出。然而,一个普遍的观察是,使用现有的修复系统可能会削弱牙根,使其容易断裂,从而导致整体治疗失败。因此,本研究在牙科手术显微镜放大下,采用超声U锉、超声尖端(Acteon Endo Success ET25 Retreatment Tip)或远多救援系统(Endo Rescue System)从根管中取出分离器械后,评估并比较其对根管垂直断裂的抵抗能力。材料与方法:将拔除的装饰下颌第一磨牙42颗中颊根进行半切,使其标准化至每颗长度为15mm。在生物力学准备后,在中颊根管的中间三分之一处有意分离4毫米长的ProTaper金旋转整理锉F2,并进行放射学验证。然后将样本随机分为三组,分别使用超声U文件、超声ET25 Retreatment尖端和远藤救援系统对分离的仪器进行检索。取下分离的器械后,使用通用试验机进行抗垂直根断裂测试,测试精度为±1%。然后对所有样本收集的数据进行统计分析。结果:超声U锉(A组)抗垂直根断裂能力最强,与ET 25超声再治疗针尖(B组)比较差异有统计学意义,A组与C组、B组与远藤救援系统(C组)比较差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。总结与结论:我们观察到超声U锉在去除分离器械后对垂直根断裂阻力的降低最小,其次是Endo救援系统,然后是超声ET25再处理针尖。由于牙根解剖、器械类型、位置、大小、牙髓状态和操作人员技能等因素,没有一种单一的器械回收系统能普遍适用于所有情况,临床医生应仔细考虑牙齿的未来预后来确定治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative evaluation of the resistance to vertical root fracture after removal of separated instruments using three instrument retrieval systems: An in vitro study.

Introduction: Separated instruments have been retrieved from root canals using different systems of instruments. However, it has been a common observation that usage of available retrieval systems may weaken the roots of teeth making them prone to fracture and subsequent failure of the treatment as a whole. Hence, the following study was conducted to evaluate and compare the resistance to vertical root fracture after retrieval of separated instruments from the root canal using Ultrasonic U Files, Ultrasonic Tip (Acteon Endo Success ET25 Retreatment Tip), or the Endo Rescue System under magnification of the dental operating microscope.

Materials and methods: Forty-two moderately curved mesiobuccal roots of extracted decoronated mandibular first molar teeth were hemisectioned to standardize them to a length of 15 mm each. Following biomechanical preparation, 4-mm length ProTaper gold rotary finishing files F2 were intentionally separated in the middle third of the mesiobuccal root canal and verified radiographically. The samples were then randomly divided into three groups, and retrieval of the separated instrument was performed using the Ultrasonic U files, Ultrasonic ET25 Retreatment tip, or Endo Rescue System, respectively. After retrieval of the separated instruments, the samples were subjected to testing for vertical root fracture resistance using a universal testing machine with an accuracy of ± 1%. The data collected from all the samples were then subjected to statistical analysis.

Result: Ultrasonic U files (Group A) showed the highest vertical root fracture resistance, with a statistically significant difference from the samples treated with ET 25 Ultrasonic retreatment tips(Group B). No significant differences were observed between Group A and C or Group B and Endo Rescue System (Group C) (P > 0.05).

Summary and conclusion: It was observed that Ultrasonic U files offer the least reduction in the vertical root fracture resistance after removal of separated instruments followed by the Endo Rescue system and then the ultrasonic ET25 retreatment tips. While no single instrument retrieval system is universally suitable for all situations due to various factors such as root anatomy, instrument type, location, size, pulpal status, and operator skill, clinicians should determine the treatment protocol by carefully considering the tooth's future prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信