在低流行地区使用模拟样本验证bdmax肠道寄生虫面板的性能。

0 PARASITOLOGY
Parasites, hosts and diseases Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.3347/PHD.24071
Bosung Park, Eun Jeong Won, Heungsup Sung, Mi-Na Kim
{"title":"在低流行地区使用模拟样本验证bdmax肠道寄生虫面板的性能。","authors":"Bosung Park, Eun Jeong Won, Heungsup Sung, Mi-Na Kim","doi":"10.3347/PHD.24071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Molecular diagnostics are essential for detecting intestinal parasites, but evaluating clinical samples from low endemic areas, including Korea, is challenging. We tested the performance of the BD MAX Enteric Parasite Panel in simulated samples for clinical use. Simulated samples were prepared with residual stool samples to confirm the diagnostic performance of the kits. Standard materials for Cryptosporidium parvum, Giardia lamblia, and Entamoeba histolytica were obtained for assessment. Limit of detection was determined by diluting standard materials into multiple concentrations and testing each in duplicate. Repeatability was assessed by retesting all samples twice. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing BD MAX System results with intended results. The limit of detection values obtained using standard materials were 781 cysts/ml, 6,250 oocysts/ml, and 125 DNA copies/ml for G. lamblia, C. parvum, and E. histolytica, respectively. Simulated G. lamblia-positive stool samples with concentrations above 6,250 cysts/ml consistently yielded positive results (100% concordance). However, C. parvum-positive stool samples at 6,250 oocysts/ml showed 50% concordance initially and 75% after retesting. At 62,500 oocysts/ml, the concordance rates were 89% initially and 100% after retesting. Overall agreement was 95.2%, but that for C. parvum was relatively low (82.4%). The diagnostic performances were 87.8% of sensitivity and 100% of specificity. Despite the limited clinical samples, BD MAX Enteric Parasite Panel showed good performance for clinical use, and spiked samples proved useful for evaluating protozoan PCR in low-incidence regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74397,"journal":{"name":"Parasites, hosts and diseases","volume":"63 1","pages":"50-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance validation of the BD MAX Enteric Parasite Panel using simulated samples in low endemic regions.\",\"authors\":\"Bosung Park, Eun Jeong Won, Heungsup Sung, Mi-Na Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3347/PHD.24071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Molecular diagnostics are essential for detecting intestinal parasites, but evaluating clinical samples from low endemic areas, including Korea, is challenging. We tested the performance of the BD MAX Enteric Parasite Panel in simulated samples for clinical use. Simulated samples were prepared with residual stool samples to confirm the diagnostic performance of the kits. Standard materials for Cryptosporidium parvum, Giardia lamblia, and Entamoeba histolytica were obtained for assessment. Limit of detection was determined by diluting standard materials into multiple concentrations and testing each in duplicate. Repeatability was assessed by retesting all samples twice. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing BD MAX System results with intended results. The limit of detection values obtained using standard materials were 781 cysts/ml, 6,250 oocysts/ml, and 125 DNA copies/ml for G. lamblia, C. parvum, and E. histolytica, respectively. Simulated G. lamblia-positive stool samples with concentrations above 6,250 cysts/ml consistently yielded positive results (100% concordance). However, C. parvum-positive stool samples at 6,250 oocysts/ml showed 50% concordance initially and 75% after retesting. At 62,500 oocysts/ml, the concordance rates were 89% initially and 100% after retesting. Overall agreement was 95.2%, but that for C. parvum was relatively low (82.4%). The diagnostic performances were 87.8% of sensitivity and 100% of specificity. Despite the limited clinical samples, BD MAX Enteric Parasite Panel showed good performance for clinical use, and spiked samples proved useful for evaluating protozoan PCR in low-incidence regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parasites, hosts and diseases\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"50-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895086/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parasites, hosts and diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3347/PHD.24071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasites, hosts and diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3347/PHD.24071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分子诊断是检测肠道寄生虫的必要手段,但对包括韩国在内的低流行地区的临床样本进行评估是一项挑战。我们在临床使用的模拟样本中测试了bdmax肠道寄生虫面板的性能。用残余粪便样品制备模拟样品,以确认试剂盒的诊断性能。获得小隐孢子虫、兰氏贾第鞭毛虫和溶组织内阿米巴的标准样品进行评估。检测限是通过将标准物质稀释成多个浓度,每个浓度重复检测来确定的。通过重新检测所有样品两次来评估重复性。通过比较BD MAX系统结果与预期结果来评估准确性。用标准品得到的检出限分别为781个囊/ml、6250个卵囊/ml和125个DNA拷贝/ml。模拟的兰氏杆菌阳性粪便样本浓度高于6250个囊肿/ml,结果一致为阳性(100%一致性)。然而,在6250个卵囊/ml的粪便样本中,C. parvum阳性的粪便样本最初的一致性为50%,重新检测后为75%。在62,500个卵囊/ml时,一致性率最初为89%,重新检测后为100%。总体吻合度为95.2%,但小梭菌的吻合度较低,为82.4%。敏感性为87.8%,特异性为100%。尽管临床样本有限,但BD MAX肠道寄生虫面板显示出良好的临床应用性能,并且加标样品被证明可用于评估低发病率地区的原生动物PCR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance validation of the BD MAX Enteric Parasite Panel using simulated samples in low endemic regions.

Molecular diagnostics are essential for detecting intestinal parasites, but evaluating clinical samples from low endemic areas, including Korea, is challenging. We tested the performance of the BD MAX Enteric Parasite Panel in simulated samples for clinical use. Simulated samples were prepared with residual stool samples to confirm the diagnostic performance of the kits. Standard materials for Cryptosporidium parvum, Giardia lamblia, and Entamoeba histolytica were obtained for assessment. Limit of detection was determined by diluting standard materials into multiple concentrations and testing each in duplicate. Repeatability was assessed by retesting all samples twice. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing BD MAX System results with intended results. The limit of detection values obtained using standard materials were 781 cysts/ml, 6,250 oocysts/ml, and 125 DNA copies/ml for G. lamblia, C. parvum, and E. histolytica, respectively. Simulated G. lamblia-positive stool samples with concentrations above 6,250 cysts/ml consistently yielded positive results (100% concordance). However, C. parvum-positive stool samples at 6,250 oocysts/ml showed 50% concordance initially and 75% after retesting. At 62,500 oocysts/ml, the concordance rates were 89% initially and 100% after retesting. Overall agreement was 95.2%, but that for C. parvum was relatively low (82.4%). The diagnostic performances were 87.8% of sensitivity and 100% of specificity. Despite the limited clinical samples, BD MAX Enteric Parasite Panel showed good performance for clinical use, and spiked samples proved useful for evaluating protozoan PCR in low-incidence regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信