基于模型的人工耳蜗听者检测阈值的电极距离和神经元密度推断。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
David J Perkel, Christopher K Giardina, Joshua H Goldwyn, Julie G Arenberg
{"title":"基于模型的人工耳蜗听者检测阈值的电极距离和神经元密度推断。","authors":"David J Perkel, Christopher K Giardina, Joshua H Goldwyn, Julie G Arenberg","doi":"10.1007/s10162-025-00978-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cochlear implants (CI) are a highly successful neural prosthesis that can restore hearing in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss. However, the extent of hearing restoration varies widely. Two major factors likely contribute to poor performance: (1) the distances between electrodes and surviving spiral ganglion neurons and (2) the density of those neurons. Reprogramming the CI at a poor electrode-neuron interface, using focused tripolar stimulation or remapping the electrodes, would benefit from understanding the cause of the poor interface.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a cochlear model with simplified geometry and neuronal composition to investigate how the interface affects stimulation thresholds. We then inverted the model to infer electrode distance and neuronal density from monopolar and tripolar threshold values obtained behaviorally. We validated this inverted model for known scenarios of electrode distance and neuronal density. Finally, we assessed the model using data from 18 CI users whose electrode distances were measured from CT imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inverted model accurately inferred electrode distance and neuronal density for known scenarios. It also reliably reproduced behavioral monopolar and tripolar threshold profiles for CI users, with mean prediction errors within 1 dB for 17/18 subjects. Fits of electrode distance were more variable; accuracy depended on the assumed value of temporal bone resistivity. Twelve subjects had minimum distance error (0.31 mm) using low resistivity (70 Ω-cm) while the others had better fits (0.30 mm) with higher resistivity (250 Ω-cm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This inverted model shows promise as a simple, practical tool to better assess and understand the electrode-neuron interface.</p>","PeriodicalId":56283,"journal":{"name":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":"185-201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model-Based Inference of Electrode Distance and Neuronal Density from Measured Detection Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Listeners.\",\"authors\":\"David J Perkel, Christopher K Giardina, Joshua H Goldwyn, Julie G Arenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10162-025-00978-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cochlear implants (CI) are a highly successful neural prosthesis that can restore hearing in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss. However, the extent of hearing restoration varies widely. Two major factors likely contribute to poor performance: (1) the distances between electrodes and surviving spiral ganglion neurons and (2) the density of those neurons. Reprogramming the CI at a poor electrode-neuron interface, using focused tripolar stimulation or remapping the electrodes, would benefit from understanding the cause of the poor interface.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a cochlear model with simplified geometry and neuronal composition to investigate how the interface affects stimulation thresholds. We then inverted the model to infer electrode distance and neuronal density from monopolar and tripolar threshold values obtained behaviorally. We validated this inverted model for known scenarios of electrode distance and neuronal density. Finally, we assessed the model using data from 18 CI users whose electrode distances were measured from CT imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inverted model accurately inferred electrode distance and neuronal density for known scenarios. It also reliably reproduced behavioral monopolar and tripolar threshold profiles for CI users, with mean prediction errors within 1 dB for 17/18 subjects. Fits of electrode distance were more variable; accuracy depended on the assumed value of temporal bone resistivity. Twelve subjects had minimum distance error (0.31 mm) using low resistivity (70 Ω-cm) while the others had better fits (0.30 mm) with higher resistivity (250 Ω-cm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This inverted model shows promise as a simple, practical tool to better assess and understand the electrode-neuron interface.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"185-201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996727/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-025-00978-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-025-00978-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人工耳蜗是一种非常成功的神经义肢,可以恢复感觉神经性听力损失患者的听力。然而,听力恢复的程度差异很大。两个主要因素可能导致性能不佳:(1)电极与存活的螺旋神经节神经元之间的距离;(2)这些神经元的密度。利用聚焦三极刺激或重新映射电极,对不良电极-神经元界面的CI进行重新编程,将有助于了解不良界面的原因。方法:采用简化几何结构和神经元组成的耳蜗模型,研究界面对刺激阈值的影响。然后,我们将模型倒置,从行为获得的单极和三极阈值推断电极距离和神经元密度。我们在已知的电极距离和神经元密度的情况下验证了这个倒置模型。最后,我们使用来自18个CI用户的数据来评估模型,这些用户的电极距离是通过CT成像测量的。结果:倒置模型准确地推断了已知场景下的电极距离和神经元密度。它还可靠地再现了CI用户的行为单极和三极阈值,17/18名受试者的平均预测误差在1 dB以内。电极距离的拟合变化较大;准确度取决于颞骨电阻率的假设值。12名受试者使用低电阻率(70 Ω-cm)时距离误差最小(0.31 mm),其余受试者使用高电阻率(250 Ω-cm)时距离误差较好(0.30 mm)。结论:该倒置模型有望成为一种简单实用的工具,以更好地评估和理解电极-神经元界面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Model-Based Inference of Electrode Distance and Neuronal Density from Measured Detection Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Purpose: Cochlear implants (CI) are a highly successful neural prosthesis that can restore hearing in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss. However, the extent of hearing restoration varies widely. Two major factors likely contribute to poor performance: (1) the distances between electrodes and surviving spiral ganglion neurons and (2) the density of those neurons. Reprogramming the CI at a poor electrode-neuron interface, using focused tripolar stimulation or remapping the electrodes, would benefit from understanding the cause of the poor interface.

Methods: We used a cochlear model with simplified geometry and neuronal composition to investigate how the interface affects stimulation thresholds. We then inverted the model to infer electrode distance and neuronal density from monopolar and tripolar threshold values obtained behaviorally. We validated this inverted model for known scenarios of electrode distance and neuronal density. Finally, we assessed the model using data from 18 CI users whose electrode distances were measured from CT imaging.

Results: The inverted model accurately inferred electrode distance and neuronal density for known scenarios. It also reliably reproduced behavioral monopolar and tripolar threshold profiles for CI users, with mean prediction errors within 1 dB for 17/18 subjects. Fits of electrode distance were more variable; accuracy depended on the assumed value of temporal bone resistivity. Twelve subjects had minimum distance error (0.31 mm) using low resistivity (70 Ω-cm) while the others had better fits (0.30 mm) with higher resistivity (250 Ω-cm).

Conclusion: This inverted model shows promise as a simple, practical tool to better assess and understand the electrode-neuron interface.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JARO is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to otolaryngology and communications sciences, including hearing, balance, speech and voice. JARO welcomes submissions describing experimental research that investigates the mechanisms underlying problems of basic and/or clinical significance. Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the kinds of papers carried by JARO by looking at past issues. Clinical case studies and pharmaceutical screens are not likely to be considered unless they reveal underlying mechanisms. Methods papers are not encouraged unless they include significant new findings as well. Reviews will be published at the discretion of the editorial board; consult the editor-in-chief before submitting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信