{"title":"下颌全景x线摄影不对称的人工智能辅助识别与评估。","authors":"Wanting Qu, Zelin Qiu, Kwong Chuen Lam, Koshla Guna Sakaran, Hao Chen, Yifan Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.01.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mandibular symmetry is crucial in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. This study aimed to establish an artificial intelligence (AI) method to automatically and accurately identify mandibular landmarks and assess asymmetry via orthopantomography (OPG) radiographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1038 OPG radiographs (451 mixed and 587 permanent dentitions) were collected and annotated to develop the AI model for identifying mandibular landmarks. First, the mesiodistal widths of the bilateral mandibular first molars were compared to categorize images as horizontally distorted or nondistorted. Next, the efficacy and robustness of the model were assessed through landmark identification, measurement, and asymmetry diagnostics accuracy using successful detection rates and interclass correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI model achieved an average landmark detection error of 0.86 ± 0.95 mm, with 0.97 ± 0.99 mm for bony landmarks and 0.54 ± 0.84 mm for dental landmarks. The successful detection rates at 1, 2, and 3 mm were 75.33%, 93.11%, and 96.72%, respectively. The accuracy exhibits region-specific variations: vertical errors were larger in condylar landmarks, whereas horizontal errors were more pronounced in the mandibular gonial angle (P <0.05). The AI and manual methods show high consistency in all measurements (interclass correlation coefficient >0.983). Condyle landmarks were more accurate in permanent dentition, whereas mandibular angle landmarks were more precise in mixed dentition (P <0.05). Furthermore, the model achieved 82.52% and 75.24% diagnostic accuracy when using gonial angle and total ramal height.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AI model accurately identifies anatomic landmarks and assesses mandibular asymmetry in OPG radiographs, demonstrating generalizability and robustness across different dentitions and showcasing potential as a promising diagnostic tool in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and assessment of mandibular asymmetry on panoramic radiography.\",\"authors\":\"Wanting Qu, Zelin Qiu, Kwong Chuen Lam, Koshla Guna Sakaran, Hao Chen, Yifan Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.01.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mandibular symmetry is crucial in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. This study aimed to establish an artificial intelligence (AI) method to automatically and accurately identify mandibular landmarks and assess asymmetry via orthopantomography (OPG) radiographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1038 OPG radiographs (451 mixed and 587 permanent dentitions) were collected and annotated to develop the AI model for identifying mandibular landmarks. First, the mesiodistal widths of the bilateral mandibular first molars were compared to categorize images as horizontally distorted or nondistorted. Next, the efficacy and robustness of the model were assessed through landmark identification, measurement, and asymmetry diagnostics accuracy using successful detection rates and interclass correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI model achieved an average landmark detection error of 0.86 ± 0.95 mm, with 0.97 ± 0.99 mm for bony landmarks and 0.54 ± 0.84 mm for dental landmarks. The successful detection rates at 1, 2, and 3 mm were 75.33%, 93.11%, and 96.72%, respectively. The accuracy exhibits region-specific variations: vertical errors were larger in condylar landmarks, whereas horizontal errors were more pronounced in the mandibular gonial angle (P <0.05). The AI and manual methods show high consistency in all measurements (interclass correlation coefficient >0.983). Condyle landmarks were more accurate in permanent dentition, whereas mandibular angle landmarks were more precise in mixed dentition (P <0.05). Furthermore, the model achieved 82.52% and 75.24% diagnostic accuracy when using gonial angle and total ramal height.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AI model accurately identifies anatomic landmarks and assesses mandibular asymmetry in OPG radiographs, demonstrating generalizability and robustness across different dentitions and showcasing potential as a promising diagnostic tool in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.01.018\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.01.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and assessment of mandibular asymmetry on panoramic radiography.
Introduction: Mandibular symmetry is crucial in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. This study aimed to establish an artificial intelligence (AI) method to automatically and accurately identify mandibular landmarks and assess asymmetry via orthopantomography (OPG) radiographs.
Methods: A total of 1038 OPG radiographs (451 mixed and 587 permanent dentitions) were collected and annotated to develop the AI model for identifying mandibular landmarks. First, the mesiodistal widths of the bilateral mandibular first molars were compared to categorize images as horizontally distorted or nondistorted. Next, the efficacy and robustness of the model were assessed through landmark identification, measurement, and asymmetry diagnostics accuracy using successful detection rates and interclass correlation coefficient.
Results: The AI model achieved an average landmark detection error of 0.86 ± 0.95 mm, with 0.97 ± 0.99 mm for bony landmarks and 0.54 ± 0.84 mm for dental landmarks. The successful detection rates at 1, 2, and 3 mm were 75.33%, 93.11%, and 96.72%, respectively. The accuracy exhibits region-specific variations: vertical errors were larger in condylar landmarks, whereas horizontal errors were more pronounced in the mandibular gonial angle (P <0.05). The AI and manual methods show high consistency in all measurements (interclass correlation coefficient >0.983). Condyle landmarks were more accurate in permanent dentition, whereas mandibular angle landmarks were more precise in mixed dentition (P <0.05). Furthermore, the model achieved 82.52% and 75.24% diagnostic accuracy when using gonial angle and total ramal height.
Conclusions: The AI model accurately identifies anatomic landmarks and assesses mandibular asymmetry in OPG radiographs, demonstrating generalizability and robustness across different dentitions and showcasing potential as a promising diagnostic tool in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.