下颌全景x线摄影不对称的人工智能辅助识别与评估。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Wanting Qu, Zelin Qiu, Kwong Chuen Lam, Koshla Guna Sakaran, Hao Chen, Yifan Lin
{"title":"下颌全景x线摄影不对称的人工智能辅助识别与评估。","authors":"Wanting Qu, Zelin Qiu, Kwong Chuen Lam, Koshla Guna Sakaran, Hao Chen, Yifan Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.01.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mandibular symmetry is crucial in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. This study aimed to establish an artificial intelligence (AI) method to automatically and accurately identify mandibular landmarks and assess asymmetry via orthopantomography (OPG) radiographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1038 OPG radiographs (451 mixed and 587 permanent dentitions) were collected and annotated to develop the AI model for identifying mandibular landmarks. First, the mesiodistal widths of the bilateral mandibular first molars were compared to categorize images as horizontally distorted or nondistorted. Next, the efficacy and robustness of the model were assessed through landmark identification, measurement, and asymmetry diagnostics accuracy using successful detection rates and interclass correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI model achieved an average landmark detection error of 0.86 ± 0.95 mm, with 0.97 ± 0.99 mm for bony landmarks and 0.54 ± 0.84 mm for dental landmarks. The successful detection rates at 1, 2, and 3 mm were 75.33%, 93.11%, and 96.72%, respectively. The accuracy exhibits region-specific variations: vertical errors were larger in condylar landmarks, whereas horizontal errors were more pronounced in the mandibular gonial angle (P <0.05). The AI and manual methods show high consistency in all measurements (interclass correlation coefficient >0.983). Condyle landmarks were more accurate in permanent dentition, whereas mandibular angle landmarks were more precise in mixed dentition (P <0.05). Furthermore, the model achieved 82.52% and 75.24% diagnostic accuracy when using gonial angle and total ramal height.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AI model accurately identifies anatomic landmarks and assesses mandibular asymmetry in OPG radiographs, demonstrating generalizability and robustness across different dentitions and showcasing potential as a promising diagnostic tool in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and assessment of mandibular asymmetry on panoramic radiography.\",\"authors\":\"Wanting Qu, Zelin Qiu, Kwong Chuen Lam, Koshla Guna Sakaran, Hao Chen, Yifan Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.01.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mandibular symmetry is crucial in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. This study aimed to establish an artificial intelligence (AI) method to automatically and accurately identify mandibular landmarks and assess asymmetry via orthopantomography (OPG) radiographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1038 OPG radiographs (451 mixed and 587 permanent dentitions) were collected and annotated to develop the AI model for identifying mandibular landmarks. First, the mesiodistal widths of the bilateral mandibular first molars were compared to categorize images as horizontally distorted or nondistorted. Next, the efficacy and robustness of the model were assessed through landmark identification, measurement, and asymmetry diagnostics accuracy using successful detection rates and interclass correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI model achieved an average landmark detection error of 0.86 ± 0.95 mm, with 0.97 ± 0.99 mm for bony landmarks and 0.54 ± 0.84 mm for dental landmarks. The successful detection rates at 1, 2, and 3 mm were 75.33%, 93.11%, and 96.72%, respectively. The accuracy exhibits region-specific variations: vertical errors were larger in condylar landmarks, whereas horizontal errors were more pronounced in the mandibular gonial angle (P <0.05). The AI and manual methods show high consistency in all measurements (interclass correlation coefficient >0.983). Condyle landmarks were more accurate in permanent dentition, whereas mandibular angle landmarks were more precise in mixed dentition (P <0.05). Furthermore, the model achieved 82.52% and 75.24% diagnostic accuracy when using gonial angle and total ramal height.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AI model accurately identifies anatomic landmarks and assesses mandibular asymmetry in OPG radiographs, demonstrating generalizability and robustness across different dentitions and showcasing potential as a promising diagnostic tool in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.01.018\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.01.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下颌对称在正畸诊断和治疗计划中至关重要。本研究旨在建立一种人工智能(AI)方法,通过骨科断层扫描(OPG) x线片自动准确地识别下颌标志并评估不对称。方法:收集1038张OPG x线片(混合牙列451张,恒牙列587张)并进行注释,建立识别下颌标志的人工智能模型。首先,比较双侧下颌第一磨牙的近远端宽度,将图像分类为水平扭曲或非扭曲。接下来,通过地标识别、测量和使用成功检测率和类间相关系数的不对称诊断准确性来评估模型的有效性和稳健性。结果:人工智能模型的平均标记检测误差为0.86±0.95 mm,其中骨标记为0.97±0.99 mm,牙标记为0.54±0.84 mm。1、2、3 mm的检出率分别为75.33%、93.11%、96.72%。准确性表现出区域特异性差异:垂直误差在髁突标志较大,而水平误差在下颌角更明显(P = 0.983)。结论:人工智能模型准确识别解剖标志并评估OPG x线片上的下颌不对称性,展示了不同牙列的通用性和稳健性,并显示了作为临床实践中有前景的诊断工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence-assisted identification and assessment of mandibular asymmetry on panoramic radiography.

Introduction: Mandibular symmetry is crucial in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. This study aimed to establish an artificial intelligence (AI) method to automatically and accurately identify mandibular landmarks and assess asymmetry via orthopantomography (OPG) radiographs.

Methods: A total of 1038 OPG radiographs (451 mixed and 587 permanent dentitions) were collected and annotated to develop the AI model for identifying mandibular landmarks. First, the mesiodistal widths of the bilateral mandibular first molars were compared to categorize images as horizontally distorted or nondistorted. Next, the efficacy and robustness of the model were assessed through landmark identification, measurement, and asymmetry diagnostics accuracy using successful detection rates and interclass correlation coefficient.

Results: The AI model achieved an average landmark detection error of 0.86 ± 0.95 mm, with 0.97 ± 0.99 mm for bony landmarks and 0.54 ± 0.84 mm for dental landmarks. The successful detection rates at 1, 2, and 3 mm were 75.33%, 93.11%, and 96.72%, respectively. The accuracy exhibits region-specific variations: vertical errors were larger in condylar landmarks, whereas horizontal errors were more pronounced in the mandibular gonial angle (P <0.05). The AI and manual methods show high consistency in all measurements (interclass correlation coefficient >0.983). Condyle landmarks were more accurate in permanent dentition, whereas mandibular angle landmarks were more precise in mixed dentition (P <0.05). Furthermore, the model achieved 82.52% and 75.24% diagnostic accuracy when using gonial angle and total ramal height.

Conclusions: The AI model accurately identifies anatomic landmarks and assesses mandibular asymmetry in OPG radiographs, demonstrating generalizability and robustness across different dentitions and showcasing potential as a promising diagnostic tool in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
432
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信