慢性阻塞性肺病的黏液溶解治疗:意大利现实环境中患者的使用和偏好。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Salvatore D'Antonio, Alfio Pennisi, Mario Cazzola
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病的黏液溶解治疗:意大利现实环境中患者的使用和偏好。","authors":"Salvatore D'Antonio, Alfio Pennisi, Mario Cazzola","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S504577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Italian COPD Patient Association (Associazione Pazienti BPCO) conducted an online survey among its 2814 members with COPD to investigate the reasons for the widespread use of mucolytic therapies by patients, often including self-prescription using over the counter (OTC) alternatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After consulting with several respiratory specialists, the Association's steering committee developed a list of nine questions with possible answers that was posted on the website of the Association. The survey was open to all members of the Association, with responses to be e-mailed to the Association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 78% the 502 participants surveyed reported having used mucolytics in the previous six months, with 54.5% using prescribed medications and 23.5% opting for OTC medications. Usage patterns revealed that 43.4% utilized mucolytics during episodes of excessive mucus, while 35.5% used them regardless of the presence of mucus. In terms of formulation preferences, water-soluble granulated sachets (34.9%) and effervescent/dispersible tablets (22.8%) were the most preferred, followed by capsules (14.1%) and aerosol ampoules (11.2%). The factors influencing these preferences were the hydration benefits of sachets and tablets, the portability and taste advantages of capsules, and the swallowing difficulties of aerosol formulations. The data showed that 26.5% of survey participants consumed the entire contents of the prescribed or OTC package, while 19.9% utilised it for a minimum of 10 days, 31.5% for a period between 5 and 10 days, and 10.2% for less than 5 days. Cost was cited as a reason for discontinuation by 8.3% of participants. Notably, 29.5% of respondents believed that mucolytic efficacy was dependent on the amount of mucus. Most patients (66.3%) used mucolytics at home, and 57.4% took the medication once daily and 24.3% twice daily. Additionally, 41.8% were aware of the dual antioxidant and mucolytic properties of the medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings emphisise the need for a patient-centred approach, encouraging healthcare providers to consider individual preferences and offer personalised advice that has the potential to improve adherence and overall outcomes for COPD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"479-486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mucolytic Therapy in COPD: Patient Usage and Preferences in Real-World Italian Settings.\",\"authors\":\"Salvatore D'Antonio, Alfio Pennisi, Mario Cazzola\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/COPD.S504577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Italian COPD Patient Association (Associazione Pazienti BPCO) conducted an online survey among its 2814 members with COPD to investigate the reasons for the widespread use of mucolytic therapies by patients, often including self-prescription using over the counter (OTC) alternatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After consulting with several respiratory specialists, the Association's steering committee developed a list of nine questions with possible answers that was posted on the website of the Association. The survey was open to all members of the Association, with responses to be e-mailed to the Association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 78% the 502 participants surveyed reported having used mucolytics in the previous six months, with 54.5% using prescribed medications and 23.5% opting for OTC medications. Usage patterns revealed that 43.4% utilized mucolytics during episodes of excessive mucus, while 35.5% used them regardless of the presence of mucus. In terms of formulation preferences, water-soluble granulated sachets (34.9%) and effervescent/dispersible tablets (22.8%) were the most preferred, followed by capsules (14.1%) and aerosol ampoules (11.2%). The factors influencing these preferences were the hydration benefits of sachets and tablets, the portability and taste advantages of capsules, and the swallowing difficulties of aerosol formulations. The data showed that 26.5% of survey participants consumed the entire contents of the prescribed or OTC package, while 19.9% utilised it for a minimum of 10 days, 31.5% for a period between 5 and 10 days, and 10.2% for less than 5 days. Cost was cited as a reason for discontinuation by 8.3% of participants. Notably, 29.5% of respondents believed that mucolytic efficacy was dependent on the amount of mucus. Most patients (66.3%) used mucolytics at home, and 57.4% took the medication once daily and 24.3% twice daily. Additionally, 41.8% were aware of the dual antioxidant and mucolytic properties of the medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings emphisise the need for a patient-centred approach, encouraging healthcare providers to consider individual preferences and offer personalised advice that has the potential to improve adherence and overall outcomes for COPD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"479-486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881622/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S504577\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S504577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意大利慢性阻塞性肺病患者协会(Associazione Pazienti BPCO)对其2814名慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行了一项在线调查,以调查患者广泛使用溶黏液疗法的原因,通常包括使用非处方(OTC)替代品的自我处方。方法:在咨询了几位呼吸系统专家后,协会指导委员会制定了一份包含九个问题和可能答案的清单,并发布在协会网站上。该调查对协会的所有成员开放,调查结果将通过电子邮件发送给协会。结果:约78%的502名调查参与者报告在过去6个月内使用过粘液溶解剂,其中54.5%使用处方药,23.5%选择非处方药。使用模式显示,43.4%的人在粘液过多时使用解黏液,而35.5%的人在有无粘液的情况下使用解黏液。在剂型偏好方面,水溶性颗粒剂(34.9%)和泡腾片(22.8%)是首选剂型,其次是胶囊(14.1%)和气雾剂安瓿(11.2%)。影响这些偏好的因素是小袋和片剂的补水效果,胶囊的便携性和口感优势,以及气雾剂配方的吞咽困难。数据显示,26.5%的调查参与者使用了处方或OTC包装的全部内容,而19.9%的人使用了至少10天,31.5%的人使用了5至10天,10.2%的人使用了不到5天。8.3%的参与者将费用列为停药的原因。值得注意的是,29.5%的应答者认为溶解黏液的效果取决于黏液的数量。大多数患者(66.3%)在家中使用解黏液药物,57.4%的患者每日使用一次,24.3%的患者每日使用两次。此外,41.8%的人知道该药物具有抗氧化和解粘双重特性。结论:这些发现强调了以患者为中心的方法的必要性,鼓励医疗保健提供者考虑个人偏好并提供个性化建议,这有可能改善COPD患者的依从性和总体结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mucolytic Therapy in COPD: Patient Usage and Preferences in Real-World Italian Settings.

Introduction: The Italian COPD Patient Association (Associazione Pazienti BPCO) conducted an online survey among its 2814 members with COPD to investigate the reasons for the widespread use of mucolytic therapies by patients, often including self-prescription using over the counter (OTC) alternatives.

Methods: After consulting with several respiratory specialists, the Association's steering committee developed a list of nine questions with possible answers that was posted on the website of the Association. The survey was open to all members of the Association, with responses to be e-mailed to the Association.

Results: Approximately 78% the 502 participants surveyed reported having used mucolytics in the previous six months, with 54.5% using prescribed medications and 23.5% opting for OTC medications. Usage patterns revealed that 43.4% utilized mucolytics during episodes of excessive mucus, while 35.5% used them regardless of the presence of mucus. In terms of formulation preferences, water-soluble granulated sachets (34.9%) and effervescent/dispersible tablets (22.8%) were the most preferred, followed by capsules (14.1%) and aerosol ampoules (11.2%). The factors influencing these preferences were the hydration benefits of sachets and tablets, the portability and taste advantages of capsules, and the swallowing difficulties of aerosol formulations. The data showed that 26.5% of survey participants consumed the entire contents of the prescribed or OTC package, while 19.9% utilised it for a minimum of 10 days, 31.5% for a period between 5 and 10 days, and 10.2% for less than 5 days. Cost was cited as a reason for discontinuation by 8.3% of participants. Notably, 29.5% of respondents believed that mucolytic efficacy was dependent on the amount of mucus. Most patients (66.3%) used mucolytics at home, and 57.4% took the medication once daily and 24.3% twice daily. Additionally, 41.8% were aware of the dual antioxidant and mucolytic properties of the medication.

Conclusion: These findings emphisise the need for a patient-centred approach, encouraging healthcare providers to consider individual preferences and offer personalised advice that has the potential to improve adherence and overall outcomes for COPD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信