制定、实施和评估一项干预措施,以改善复杂患者的多学科交流。

Q2 Social Sciences
Amy B Hooberman, Jessica Ameling, James Henderson, Matthew Bucala, Milisa Manojlovich, Yvette Salamey, Jeremy B Sussman
{"title":"制定、实施和评估一项干预措施,以改善复杂患者的多学科交流。","authors":"Amy B Hooberman, Jessica Ameling, James Henderson, Matthew Bucala, Milisa Manojlovich, Yvette Salamey, Jeremy B Sussman","doi":"10.1080/17538068.2025.2473249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complex patients require multidisciplinary input for optimal care, but this can lead to fragmented care. This project aimed to improve multidisciplinary communication, care coordination, and patient satisfaction in primary care clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multidisciplinary team meetings focused on discussing complex patients over six months. Pre- and post-intervention surveys assessed changes in communication and satisfaction among healthcare providers and staff. Patient surveys evaluated their satisfaction with care. The generated action items at multidisciplinary meetings, such as new referrals, were categorized to evaluate the impact on care coordination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-intervention surveys showed positive responses regarding improved teamwork, communication, and patient care, but ongoing challenges in the selection of patients and team meeting participants. On average, there were 2.3 new referrals per patient, indicating enhanced care coordination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidisciplinary team meetings showed promise in enhancing communication, care coordination, and staff satisfaction. Ongoing refinement and assessment are necessary to optimize their feasibility and effectiveness over a longer time period.</p>","PeriodicalId":38052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development, implementation, and evaluation of an intervention to improve multidisciplinary communication about complex patients.\",\"authors\":\"Amy B Hooberman, Jessica Ameling, James Henderson, Matthew Bucala, Milisa Manojlovich, Yvette Salamey, Jeremy B Sussman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17538068.2025.2473249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complex patients require multidisciplinary input for optimal care, but this can lead to fragmented care. This project aimed to improve multidisciplinary communication, care coordination, and patient satisfaction in primary care clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multidisciplinary team meetings focused on discussing complex patients over six months. Pre- and post-intervention surveys assessed changes in communication and satisfaction among healthcare providers and staff. Patient surveys evaluated their satisfaction with care. The generated action items at multidisciplinary meetings, such as new referrals, were categorized to evaluate the impact on care coordination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-intervention surveys showed positive responses regarding improved teamwork, communication, and patient care, but ongoing challenges in the selection of patients and team meeting participants. On average, there were 2.3 new referrals per patient, indicating enhanced care coordination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidisciplinary team meetings showed promise in enhancing communication, care coordination, and staff satisfaction. Ongoing refinement and assessment are necessary to optimize their feasibility and effectiveness over a longer time period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Communication in Healthcare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Communication in Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2025.2473249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2025.2473249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:复杂的患者需要多学科的投入,以获得最佳的护理,但这可能导致碎片化的护理。本计划旨在改善基层医疗诊所的多学科沟通、护理协调及病人满意度。方法:多学科小组会议集中讨论复杂的病人超过六个月。干预前和干预后的调查评估了医疗保健提供者和工作人员之间沟通和满意度的变化。患者调查评估了他们对护理的满意度。在多学科会议上产生的行动项目,如新的转诊,被分类以评估对护理协调的影响。结果:干预后的调查显示,在改善团队合作、沟通和患者护理方面有积极的反应,但在选择患者和团队会议参与者方面仍存在挑战。平均每位患者有2.3个新转诊,表明护理协调得到加强。结论:多学科小组会议有助于加强沟通、护理协调和员工满意度。为了在较长时间内优化其可行性和有效性,需要不断进行改进和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development, implementation, and evaluation of an intervention to improve multidisciplinary communication about complex patients.

Background: Complex patients require multidisciplinary input for optimal care, but this can lead to fragmented care. This project aimed to improve multidisciplinary communication, care coordination, and patient satisfaction in primary care clinics.

Methods: Multidisciplinary team meetings focused on discussing complex patients over six months. Pre- and post-intervention surveys assessed changes in communication and satisfaction among healthcare providers and staff. Patient surveys evaluated their satisfaction with care. The generated action items at multidisciplinary meetings, such as new referrals, were categorized to evaluate the impact on care coordination.

Results: Post-intervention surveys showed positive responses regarding improved teamwork, communication, and patient care, but ongoing challenges in the selection of patients and team meeting participants. On average, there were 2.3 new referrals per patient, indicating enhanced care coordination.

Conclusions: Multidisciplinary team meetings showed promise in enhancing communication, care coordination, and staff satisfaction. Ongoing refinement and assessment are necessary to optimize their feasibility and effectiveness over a longer time period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communication in Healthcare
Journal of Communication in Healthcare Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信