Predrag Gajin, Jovan Petrovic, Slobodan Pesic, Igor Atanasijevic, Aleksandar Babic, Mihailo Neskovic, Petar Dabic, Srdjan Babic, Predrag Matic, Slobodan Tanaskovic, Nenad Ilijevski
{"title":"渐增性短暂性脑缺血发作的紧急颈动脉内膜切除术。","authors":"Predrag Gajin, Jovan Petrovic, Slobodan Pesic, Igor Atanasijevic, Aleksandar Babic, Mihailo Neskovic, Petar Dabic, Srdjan Babic, Predrag Matic, Slobodan Tanaskovic, Nenad Ilijevski","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a widely accepted treatment to mitigate stroke risk in patients with severe carotid stenosis. The timing of CEA, especially in cases of acute neurological symptoms like crescendo transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke-in-evolution, remains contentious. This study evaluates the effectiveness of urgent CEA (UCEA) within 6 hours of crescendo TIA onset compared to elective CEA (ECEA) performed within 2 weeks in preventing recurrent stroke. <i>Patients and methods:</i> This retrospective study analyzed 87 patients with crescendo TIA treated with UCEA and compared them with a matched control group of 174 patients who underwent ECEA for symptomatic carotid disease. All patients underwent preoperative multidetector computed tomography angiography. Primary outcomes included mortality, stroke, TIA, and major adverse cardiac events within 30 days and up to 6 months postoperatively. <i>Results:</i> The UCEA group demonstrated no postoperative strokes or TIAs, with a low complication rate. UCEA resulted in one stroke within 6 months, with complete recovery. The ECEA group experienced one stroke and one death. There were no significant differences in early postoperative complications between the groups. However, the UCEA group exhibited a higher overall mortality rate (4.6% vs. 0.6%; p = 0.044), predominantly due to myocardial infarction. Both groups demonstrated comparable outcomes regarding postoperative complications and carotid restenosis at follow-up. <i>Conclusions:</i> UCEA performed within six hours of crescendo TIA shows comparable perioperative outcomes to ECEA in preventing recurrent strokes. While these findings suggest early intervention with UCEA may be a viable approach for patients with crescendo TIA, significant methodological limitations preclude definitive conclusions about safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"259-264"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urgent carotid endarterectomy for crescendo transient ischemic attack.\",\"authors\":\"Predrag Gajin, Jovan Petrovic, Slobodan Pesic, Igor Atanasijevic, Aleksandar Babic, Mihailo Neskovic, Petar Dabic, Srdjan Babic, Predrag Matic, Slobodan Tanaskovic, Nenad Ilijevski\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/0301-1526/a001188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a widely accepted treatment to mitigate stroke risk in patients with severe carotid stenosis. The timing of CEA, especially in cases of acute neurological symptoms like crescendo transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke-in-evolution, remains contentious. This study evaluates the effectiveness of urgent CEA (UCEA) within 6 hours of crescendo TIA onset compared to elective CEA (ECEA) performed within 2 weeks in preventing recurrent stroke. <i>Patients and methods:</i> This retrospective study analyzed 87 patients with crescendo TIA treated with UCEA and compared them with a matched control group of 174 patients who underwent ECEA for symptomatic carotid disease. All patients underwent preoperative multidetector computed tomography angiography. Primary outcomes included mortality, stroke, TIA, and major adverse cardiac events within 30 days and up to 6 months postoperatively. <i>Results:</i> The UCEA group demonstrated no postoperative strokes or TIAs, with a low complication rate. UCEA resulted in one stroke within 6 months, with complete recovery. The ECEA group experienced one stroke and one death. There were no significant differences in early postoperative complications between the groups. However, the UCEA group exhibited a higher overall mortality rate (4.6% vs. 0.6%; p = 0.044), predominantly due to myocardial infarction. Both groups demonstrated comparable outcomes regarding postoperative complications and carotid restenosis at follow-up. <i>Conclusions:</i> UCEA performed within six hours of crescendo TIA shows comparable perioperative outcomes to ECEA in preventing recurrent strokes. While these findings suggest early intervention with UCEA may be a viable approach for patients with crescendo TIA, significant methodological limitations preclude definitive conclusions about safety and efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"259-264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001188\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)是一种广泛接受的治疗方法,可降低严重颈动脉狭窄患者的卒中风险。CEA的时机,特别是在急性神经系统症状如渐强性短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)和进化中中风的情况下,仍然存在争议。本研究评估了TIA渐强发作后6小时内紧急CEA (UCEA)与2周内择期CEA (ECEA)在预防卒中复发方面的效果。患者和方法:本回顾性研究分析了87例接受UCEA治疗的渐强性TIA患者,并将其与174例接受ECEA治疗症状性颈动脉疾病的对照组患者进行了比较。所有患者术前均行多探测器计算机断层血管造影。主要结局包括术后30天至6个月内的死亡率、卒中、TIA和主要心脏不良事件。结果:UCEA组术后无脑卒中和tia,并发症发生率低。UCEA在6个月内导致1例中风,完全恢复。ECEA组出现1例中风和1例死亡。两组术后早期并发症无明显差异。然而,UCEA组表现出更高的总体死亡率(4.6% vs. 0.6%;P = 0.044),主要是由于心肌梗死。两组在术后并发症和颈动脉再狭窄方面的随访结果相当。结论:在渐进性TIA术后6小时内进行UCEA与ECEA在预防卒中复发方面的围手术期结果相当。虽然这些研究结果表明,UCEA早期干预可能是渐强性TIA患者的可行方法,但显著的方法局限性使其无法得出关于安全性和有效性的明确结论。
Urgent carotid endarterectomy for crescendo transient ischemic attack.
Background: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a widely accepted treatment to mitigate stroke risk in patients with severe carotid stenosis. The timing of CEA, especially in cases of acute neurological symptoms like crescendo transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke-in-evolution, remains contentious. This study evaluates the effectiveness of urgent CEA (UCEA) within 6 hours of crescendo TIA onset compared to elective CEA (ECEA) performed within 2 weeks in preventing recurrent stroke. Patients and methods: This retrospective study analyzed 87 patients with crescendo TIA treated with UCEA and compared them with a matched control group of 174 patients who underwent ECEA for symptomatic carotid disease. All patients underwent preoperative multidetector computed tomography angiography. Primary outcomes included mortality, stroke, TIA, and major adverse cardiac events within 30 days and up to 6 months postoperatively. Results: The UCEA group demonstrated no postoperative strokes or TIAs, with a low complication rate. UCEA resulted in one stroke within 6 months, with complete recovery. The ECEA group experienced one stroke and one death. There were no significant differences in early postoperative complications between the groups. However, the UCEA group exhibited a higher overall mortality rate (4.6% vs. 0.6%; p = 0.044), predominantly due to myocardial infarction. Both groups demonstrated comparable outcomes regarding postoperative complications and carotid restenosis at follow-up. Conclusions: UCEA performed within six hours of crescendo TIA shows comparable perioperative outcomes to ECEA in preventing recurrent strokes. While these findings suggest early intervention with UCEA may be a viable approach for patients with crescendo TIA, significant methodological limitations preclude definitive conclusions about safety and efficacy.
期刊介绍:
Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology.
The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation.
Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.