验证患者的观点:满意度调查工具的可靠性研究。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-03-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S490871
Lorena Charrier, Andrea Ricotti, Fabiana Marnetto, Rosanna Irene Comoretto, Paola Berchialla, Elena Cristina Carratello, Mariacristina Favero Fra, Graziella Costamagna, Paola Dalmasso, Maria Carmen Azzolina
{"title":"验证患者的观点:满意度调查工具的可靠性研究。","authors":"Lorena Charrier, Andrea Ricotti, Fabiana Marnetto, Rosanna Irene Comoretto, Paola Berchialla, Elena Cristina Carratello, Mariacristina Favero Fra, Graziella Costamagna, Paola Dalmasso, Maria Carmen Azzolina","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S490871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patient perceptions of care quality can guide targeted improvements. Valid and reliable measures are essential for meaningful patient satisfaction assessment, but no validated questionnaires were found among those used in most Italian hospitals. This study aimed to assess the internal reliability and construct validity of two patient satisfaction questionnaires (one for outpatient care and one for inpatient care) developed at Ordine Mauriziano Hospital in Torino, Italy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The questionnaires underwent face and content validation based on literature, brainstorming, and expert input. After Ethics Committee approval, patients admitted to or accessing the Ordine Mauriziano Hospital for outpatient visits completed the inpatient and outpatient care questionnaires, respectively. Responses were analyzed for internal reliability (Cronbach's ɑ) and construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between February and May 2024, 371 outpatient and 374 inpatient questionnaires were fully completed (78%). Both questionnaires' specific subscales showed high internal reliability (Cronbach's ɑ ≥0.80) and a significant positive correlation with overall satisfaction, confirming construct validity. CFA fit indices met recommended thresholds: CFI>0.9, RMSEA, and SRMR<0.08.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that both questionnaires are valid and reliable for assessing patient satisfaction. They offer valuable insights for healthcare personnel and managers to improve care by focusing efforts and investments on areas needing enhancement and strengthening successful dimensions. Moreover, the widespread use of these tools at the regional level will provide decision-makers with more robust and comparable data over time and across care facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"463-472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating Patient Perspectives: A Study on the Reliability of Satisfaction Survey Tools.\",\"authors\":\"Lorena Charrier, Andrea Ricotti, Fabiana Marnetto, Rosanna Irene Comoretto, Paola Berchialla, Elena Cristina Carratello, Mariacristina Favero Fra, Graziella Costamagna, Paola Dalmasso, Maria Carmen Azzolina\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S490871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patient perceptions of care quality can guide targeted improvements. Valid and reliable measures are essential for meaningful patient satisfaction assessment, but no validated questionnaires were found among those used in most Italian hospitals. This study aimed to assess the internal reliability and construct validity of two patient satisfaction questionnaires (one for outpatient care and one for inpatient care) developed at Ordine Mauriziano Hospital in Torino, Italy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The questionnaires underwent face and content validation based on literature, brainstorming, and expert input. After Ethics Committee approval, patients admitted to or accessing the Ordine Mauriziano Hospital for outpatient visits completed the inpatient and outpatient care questionnaires, respectively. Responses were analyzed for internal reliability (Cronbach's ɑ) and construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between February and May 2024, 371 outpatient and 374 inpatient questionnaires were fully completed (78%). Both questionnaires' specific subscales showed high internal reliability (Cronbach's ɑ ≥0.80) and a significant positive correlation with overall satisfaction, confirming construct validity. CFA fit indices met recommended thresholds: CFI>0.9, RMSEA, and SRMR<0.08.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that both questionnaires are valid and reliable for assessing patient satisfaction. They offer valuable insights for healthcare personnel and managers to improve care by focusing efforts and investments on areas needing enhancement and strengthening successful dimensions. Moreover, the widespread use of these tools at the regional level will provide decision-makers with more robust and comparable data over time and across care facilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"463-472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881768/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S490871\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S490871","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:患者对护理质量的感知可以指导有针对性的改善。有效和可靠的措施对于有意义的患者满意度评估至关重要,但在大多数意大利医院使用的问卷中没有发现有效的问卷。本研究旨在评估意大利都灵Ordine Mauriziano医院门诊和住院病人满意度问卷的内部信度和结构效度。患者和方法:根据文献、头脑风暴和专家意见,对问卷进行了面部和内容验证。经伦理委员会批准后,入住或前往Ordine Mauriziano医院门诊就诊的患者分别填写住院和门诊问卷。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)分析应答的内部信度(Cronbach's)和结构效度。结果:2024年2月至5月,共完成门诊问卷371份,住院问卷374份(78%)。两份问卷的特定子量表均具有较高的内部信度(Cronbach's r≥0.80),且与整体满意度呈显著正相关,证实了结构效度。CFA拟合指数满足推荐阈值:CFI >.9, RMSEA和srmr结论:结果表明,两份问卷都是评估患者满意度的有效和可靠的。它们为医疗保健人员和管理人员提供了有价值的见解,可以通过将努力和投资集中在需要改进和加强成功维度的领域来改善护理。此外,在区域一级广泛使用这些工具将为决策者提供更可靠和可比较的跨时间和跨护理机构数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validating Patient Perspectives: A Study on the Reliability of Satisfaction Survey Tools.

Purpose: Patient perceptions of care quality can guide targeted improvements. Valid and reliable measures are essential for meaningful patient satisfaction assessment, but no validated questionnaires were found among those used in most Italian hospitals. This study aimed to assess the internal reliability and construct validity of two patient satisfaction questionnaires (one for outpatient care and one for inpatient care) developed at Ordine Mauriziano Hospital in Torino, Italy.

Patients and methods: The questionnaires underwent face and content validation based on literature, brainstorming, and expert input. After Ethics Committee approval, patients admitted to or accessing the Ordine Mauriziano Hospital for outpatient visits completed the inpatient and outpatient care questionnaires, respectively. Responses were analyzed for internal reliability (Cronbach's ɑ) and construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

Results: Between February and May 2024, 371 outpatient and 374 inpatient questionnaires were fully completed (78%). Both questionnaires' specific subscales showed high internal reliability (Cronbach's ɑ ≥0.80) and a significant positive correlation with overall satisfaction, confirming construct validity. CFA fit indices met recommended thresholds: CFI>0.9, RMSEA, and SRMR<0.08.

Conclusion: The results suggest that both questionnaires are valid and reliable for assessing patient satisfaction. They offer valuable insights for healthcare personnel and managers to improve care by focusing efforts and investments on areas needing enhancement and strengthening successful dimensions. Moreover, the widespread use of these tools at the regional level will provide decision-makers with more robust and comparable data over time and across care facilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信