分子检测与真菌学方法诊断犀牛眼眶毛霉病:120例COVID-19患者临床标本分析

IF 3.6 3区 生物学 Q2 MYCOLOGY
Sajedeh Soltani, Mahzad Erami, Kazem Ahmadikia, Shima Aboutalebian, Faezeh Rouhi, Mojtaba Fakhrehi, Reza Mohammadi Manesh, Hossein Mirhendi
{"title":"分子检测与真菌学方法诊断犀牛眼眶毛霉病:120例COVID-19患者临床标本分析","authors":"Sajedeh Soltani, Mahzad Erami, Kazem Ahmadikia, Shima Aboutalebian, Faezeh Rouhi, Mojtaba Fakhrehi, Reza Mohammadi Manesh, Hossein Mirhendi","doi":"10.1007/s11046-025-00937-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mucormycosis, a fungal emergency, poses a serious threat to both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 individuals due to its invasive nature, rapid progression, and high rates of morbidity and mortality. This underscores the crucial need for timely detection and management. In this study, we investigated the utility of real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assays for detecting Mucorales in clinical specimens, and assessed the performance of both SYBR Green and TaqMan probe RT-qPCR in amplifying Mucorales-specific 18S rDNA genes. We conducted accuracy analyses using direct examination with KOH as a standard for the laboratory diagnosis of mucormycosis. Additionally, we compared the results with culture and duplex PCR.</p><p><strong>Patients/methods: </strong>Both SYBR Green and TaqMan RT-qPCR were optimized using Mucorales-specific oligonucleotides to amplify the conserved 18S rDNA targets. DNAs extracted from 120 rhino sinus specimens, which all were collected from COVID-19 patients upon suspicion of invasive fungal infections, were used for molecular diagnosis. The results of both RT-qPCR assays were compared with the result of direct microscopy, culture, and duplex Mucorales-specific PCR assay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SYBR Green real-time PCR produced a distinct melting temperature (Tm) pattern (80.24 ± 0.70 °C) and detected Mucorales in 51 out of 120 clinical samples. When compared to direct examination with KOH, the standard method for diagnosing mucormycosis, SYBR Green PCR demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.67% (95% confidence interval (CI): 86.7-96.5%) and a specificity of 90.28% (95% CI: 84.9-95.5%). In contrast, TaqMan-probe PCR identified Mucorales in 34 out of 120 samples, with a sensitivity of 64.58% (95% CI: 56-73.1%) and a specificity of 95.83% (95% CI: 92.26-99.39%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SYBR Green-based PCR can be used as a reliable confirmatory test for diagnosing mucormycosis, particularly in cases with atypical hyphae, mixed infections (featuring both septate and non-septate hyphae), or when the direct examination is positive but culture results are negative. The lower sensitivity of the TaqMan-probe PCR may be attributed to factors such as using a degenerate probe, which can lead to false-negative results.</p>","PeriodicalId":19017,"journal":{"name":"Mycopathologia","volume":"190 2","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular Assays Versus Mycological Methods for Diagnosis of Rhino Orbital Mucormycosis: Analysis of 120 Clinical Specimens from COVID-19 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Sajedeh Soltani, Mahzad Erami, Kazem Ahmadikia, Shima Aboutalebian, Faezeh Rouhi, Mojtaba Fakhrehi, Reza Mohammadi Manesh, Hossein Mirhendi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11046-025-00937-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mucormycosis, a fungal emergency, poses a serious threat to both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 individuals due to its invasive nature, rapid progression, and high rates of morbidity and mortality. This underscores the crucial need for timely detection and management. In this study, we investigated the utility of real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assays for detecting Mucorales in clinical specimens, and assessed the performance of both SYBR Green and TaqMan probe RT-qPCR in amplifying Mucorales-specific 18S rDNA genes. We conducted accuracy analyses using direct examination with KOH as a standard for the laboratory diagnosis of mucormycosis. Additionally, we compared the results with culture and duplex PCR.</p><p><strong>Patients/methods: </strong>Both SYBR Green and TaqMan RT-qPCR were optimized using Mucorales-specific oligonucleotides to amplify the conserved 18S rDNA targets. DNAs extracted from 120 rhino sinus specimens, which all were collected from COVID-19 patients upon suspicion of invasive fungal infections, were used for molecular diagnosis. The results of both RT-qPCR assays were compared with the result of direct microscopy, culture, and duplex Mucorales-specific PCR assay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SYBR Green real-time PCR produced a distinct melting temperature (Tm) pattern (80.24 ± 0.70 °C) and detected Mucorales in 51 out of 120 clinical samples. When compared to direct examination with KOH, the standard method for diagnosing mucormycosis, SYBR Green PCR demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.67% (95% confidence interval (CI): 86.7-96.5%) and a specificity of 90.28% (95% CI: 84.9-95.5%). In contrast, TaqMan-probe PCR identified Mucorales in 34 out of 120 samples, with a sensitivity of 64.58% (95% CI: 56-73.1%) and a specificity of 95.83% (95% CI: 92.26-99.39%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SYBR Green-based PCR can be used as a reliable confirmatory test for diagnosing mucormycosis, particularly in cases with atypical hyphae, mixed infections (featuring both septate and non-septate hyphae), or when the direct examination is positive but culture results are negative. The lower sensitivity of the TaqMan-probe PCR may be attributed to factors such as using a degenerate probe, which can lead to false-negative results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mycopathologia\",\"volume\":\"190 2\",\"pages\":\"30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mycopathologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-025-00937-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MYCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycopathologia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-025-00937-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:毛霉病是一种真菌急症,因其侵袭性、进展迅速、发病率和死亡率高,对COVID-19和非COVID-19个体都构成严重威胁。这强调了及时发现和管理的关键必要性。在本研究中,我们研究了实时荧光定量PCR (RT-qPCR)在临床标本中检测毛霉菌的应用,并评估了SYBR Green和TaqMan探针RT-qPCR在扩增毛霉菌特异性18S rDNA基因方面的性能。我们进行了准确性分析使用直接检查与KOH作为实验室诊断毛霉病的标准。此外,我们将结果与培养和双链PCR进行了比较。患者/方法:使用mucorales特异性寡核苷酸对SYBR Green和TaqMan RT-qPCR进行优化,扩增保守的18S rDNA靶点。120例疑似侵袭性真菌感染患者的鼻窦标本提取dna用于分子诊断。将两种RT-qPCR检测结果与直接镜检、培养和双重粘膜特异性PCR检测结果进行比较。结果:SYBR Green real-time PCR检测出明显的熔融温度(Tm)模式(80.24±0.70°C), 120份临床样本中有51份检测到Mucorales。与毛霉病的标准诊断方法KOH直接检测相比,SYBR Green PCR的敏感性为91.67%(95%可信区间(CI): 86.7-96.5%),特异性为90.28% (95% CI: 84.9-95.5%)。相比之下,taqman探针PCR在120个样本中鉴定出34个Mucorales,灵敏度为64.58% (95% CI: 56-73.1%),特异性为95.83% (95% CI: 92.26-99.39%)。结论:SYBR绿色PCR可作为毛霉病诊断的可靠确证试验,尤其适用于非典型菌丝、混合性感染(菌丝分离和非分离)或直接检查阳性而培养结果阴性的病例。taqman探针PCR的灵敏度较低可能是由于使用退化探针等因素,这可能导致假阴性结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Molecular Assays Versus Mycological Methods for Diagnosis of Rhino Orbital Mucormycosis: Analysis of 120 Clinical Specimens from COVID-19 Patients.

Background: Mucormycosis, a fungal emergency, poses a serious threat to both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 individuals due to its invasive nature, rapid progression, and high rates of morbidity and mortality. This underscores the crucial need for timely detection and management. In this study, we investigated the utility of real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assays for detecting Mucorales in clinical specimens, and assessed the performance of both SYBR Green and TaqMan probe RT-qPCR in amplifying Mucorales-specific 18S rDNA genes. We conducted accuracy analyses using direct examination with KOH as a standard for the laboratory diagnosis of mucormycosis. Additionally, we compared the results with culture and duplex PCR.

Patients/methods: Both SYBR Green and TaqMan RT-qPCR were optimized using Mucorales-specific oligonucleotides to amplify the conserved 18S rDNA targets. DNAs extracted from 120 rhino sinus specimens, which all were collected from COVID-19 patients upon suspicion of invasive fungal infections, were used for molecular diagnosis. The results of both RT-qPCR assays were compared with the result of direct microscopy, culture, and duplex Mucorales-specific PCR assay.

Results: SYBR Green real-time PCR produced a distinct melting temperature (Tm) pattern (80.24 ± 0.70 °C) and detected Mucorales in 51 out of 120 clinical samples. When compared to direct examination with KOH, the standard method for diagnosing mucormycosis, SYBR Green PCR demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.67% (95% confidence interval (CI): 86.7-96.5%) and a specificity of 90.28% (95% CI: 84.9-95.5%). In contrast, TaqMan-probe PCR identified Mucorales in 34 out of 120 samples, with a sensitivity of 64.58% (95% CI: 56-73.1%) and a specificity of 95.83% (95% CI: 92.26-99.39%).

Conclusion: SYBR Green-based PCR can be used as a reliable confirmatory test for diagnosing mucormycosis, particularly in cases with atypical hyphae, mixed infections (featuring both septate and non-septate hyphae), or when the direct examination is positive but culture results are negative. The lower sensitivity of the TaqMan-probe PCR may be attributed to factors such as using a degenerate probe, which can lead to false-negative results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mycopathologia
Mycopathologia 生物-真菌学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
76
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Mycopathologia is an official journal of the International Union of Microbiological Societies (IUMS). Mycopathologia was founded in 1938 with the mission to ‘diffuse the understanding of fungal diseases in man and animals among mycologists’. Many of the milestones discoveries in the field of medical mycology have been communicated through the pages of this journal. Mycopathologia covers a diverse, interdisciplinary range of topics that is unique in breadth and depth. The journal publishes peer-reviewed, original articles highlighting important developments concerning medically important fungi and fungal diseases. The journal highlights important developments in fungal systematics and taxonomy, laboratory diagnosis of fungal infections, antifungal drugs, clinical presentation and treatment, and epidemiology of fungal diseases globally. Timely opinion articles, mini-reviews, and other communications are usually invited at the discretion of the editorial board. Unique case reports highlighting unprecedented progress in the diagnosis and treatment of fungal infections, are published in every issue of the journal. MycopathologiaIMAGE is another regular feature for a brief clinical report of potential interest to a mixed audience of physicians and laboratory scientists. MycopathologiaGENOME is designed for the rapid publication of new genomes of human and animal pathogenic fungi using a checklist-based, standardized format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信