反向遗传学方法抢救严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒的有效性研究

IF 3.3 4区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.71150/jm.2411023
Chang-Joo Park, Taehun Kim, Seung-Min Yoo, Myung-Shin Lee, Nam-Hyuk Cho, Changhoon Park
{"title":"反向遗传学方法抢救严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒的有效性研究","authors":"Chang-Joo Park, Taehun Kim, Seung-Min Yoo, Myung-Shin Lee, Nam-Hyuk Cho, Changhoon Park","doi":"10.71150/jm.2411023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bacteria-free reverse genetics techniques are crucial for the efficient generation of recombinant viruses, bypassing the need for labor-intensive bacterial cloning. These methods are particularly relevant for studying the pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19. This study compared the efficiency of three bacteria-free approaches-circular polymerase extension reaction (CPER) with and without nick sealing and infectious sub-genomic amplicons (ISA)-to bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-based technology for rescuing SARS-CoV-2. Significant differences in viral titers following transfection were observed between methods. CPER with nick sealing generated virus titers comparable to those of the BAC-based method and 10 times higher than those of the standard CPER. In contrast, ISA demonstrated extremely low efficiency, as cytopathic effects were detected only after two passages. All rescued viruses exhibited replication kinetics consistent with those of the original strain, with no significant deviation in replication capacity. Furthermore, the utility of CPER and ISA in genetically modifying SARS-CoV-2 was demonstrated by successfully inserting the gene encoding green fluorescent protein into the genome. Overall, this study underscores the potential of bacteria-free methods, such as CPER and ISA, in advancing SARS-CoV-2 research while highlighting their significant differences in efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":16546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology","volume":"63 2","pages":"e2411023"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of reverse genetics methods for rescuing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.\",\"authors\":\"Chang-Joo Park, Taehun Kim, Seung-Min Yoo, Myung-Shin Lee, Nam-Hyuk Cho, Changhoon Park\",\"doi\":\"10.71150/jm.2411023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bacteria-free reverse genetics techniques are crucial for the efficient generation of recombinant viruses, bypassing the need for labor-intensive bacterial cloning. These methods are particularly relevant for studying the pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19. This study compared the efficiency of three bacteria-free approaches-circular polymerase extension reaction (CPER) with and without nick sealing and infectious sub-genomic amplicons (ISA)-to bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-based technology for rescuing SARS-CoV-2. Significant differences in viral titers following transfection were observed between methods. CPER with nick sealing generated virus titers comparable to those of the BAC-based method and 10 times higher than those of the standard CPER. In contrast, ISA demonstrated extremely low efficiency, as cytopathic effects were detected only after two passages. All rescued viruses exhibited replication kinetics consistent with those of the original strain, with no significant deviation in replication capacity. Furthermore, the utility of CPER and ISA in genetically modifying SARS-CoV-2 was demonstrated by successfully inserting the gene encoding green fluorescent protein into the genome. Overall, this study underscores the potential of bacteria-free methods, such as CPER and ISA, in advancing SARS-CoV-2 research while highlighting their significant differences in efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"63 2\",\"pages\":\"e2411023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.71150/jm.2411023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.71150/jm.2411023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无细菌的反向遗传技术对于有效地产生重组病毒至关重要,它绕过了对劳动密集型细菌克隆的需要。这些方法对于研究COVID-19的病原体-严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)的发病机制特别重要。本研究比较了三种无细菌方法-环状聚合酶延伸反应(CPER)和不带缺口密封和传染性亚基因组扩增子(ISA)-基于细菌人工染色体(BAC)的技术对SARS-CoV-2的拯救效率。两种方法转染后的病毒滴度有显著差异。缺口封闭的CPER产生的病毒滴度与基于bac的方法相当,比标准CPER高10倍。相比之下,ISA表现出极低的效率,因为只有在两次传代后才检测到细胞病变效应。所有获救的病毒都表现出与原始菌株一致的复制动力学,在复制能力上没有明显的偏差。此外,通过将编码绿色荧光蛋白的基因成功插入基因组,证明了CPER和ISA在基因修饰SARS-CoV-2中的作用。总体而言,本研究强调了CPER和ISA等无细菌方法在推进SARS-CoV-2研究方面的潜力,同时强调了它们在效率上的显着差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiency of reverse genetics methods for rescuing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Bacteria-free reverse genetics techniques are crucial for the efficient generation of recombinant viruses, bypassing the need for labor-intensive bacterial cloning. These methods are particularly relevant for studying the pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of COVID-19. This study compared the efficiency of three bacteria-free approaches-circular polymerase extension reaction (CPER) with and without nick sealing and infectious sub-genomic amplicons (ISA)-to bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-based technology for rescuing SARS-CoV-2. Significant differences in viral titers following transfection were observed between methods. CPER with nick sealing generated virus titers comparable to those of the BAC-based method and 10 times higher than those of the standard CPER. In contrast, ISA demonstrated extremely low efficiency, as cytopathic effects were detected only after two passages. All rescued viruses exhibited replication kinetics consistent with those of the original strain, with no significant deviation in replication capacity. Furthermore, the utility of CPER and ISA in genetically modifying SARS-CoV-2 was demonstrated by successfully inserting the gene encoding green fluorescent protein into the genome. Overall, this study underscores the potential of bacteria-free methods, such as CPER and ISA, in advancing SARS-CoV-2 research while highlighting their significant differences in efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology
Journal of Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Publishes papers that deal with research on microorganisms, including archaea, bacteria, yeasts, fungi, microalgae, protozoa, and simple eukaryotic microorganisms. Topics considered for publication include Microbial Systematics, Evolutionary Microbiology, Microbial Ecology, Environmental Microbiology, Microbial Genetics, Genomics, Molecular Biology, Microbial Physiology, Biochemistry, Microbial Pathogenesis, Host-Microbe Interaction, Systems Microbiology, Synthetic Microbiology, Bioinformatics and Virology. Manuscripts dealing with simple identification of microorganism(s), cloning of a known gene and its expression in a microbial host, and clinical statistics will not be considered for publication by JM.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信