Norah C Hass, Jennifer Schuster Wachen, Casey L Straud, Erica Checko, Donald D McGeary, Cindy A McGeary, Jim Mintz, Brett T Litz, Stacey Young-McCaughan, Jeffrey S Yarvis, Alan L Peterson, Patricia A Resick
{"title":"现役军人认知加工治疗后疼痛和相关健康结果的变化。","authors":"Norah C Hass, Jennifer Schuster Wachen, Casey L Straud, Erica Checko, Donald D McGeary, Cindy A McGeary, Jim Mintz, Brett T Litz, Stacey Young-McCaughan, Jeffrey S Yarvis, Alan L Peterson, Patricia A Resick","doi":"10.1002/jts.23143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored the association between changes in pain and related health outcomes and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms following cognitive processing therapy (CPT) in an active duty military sample. Based on the mutual maintenance model, we hypothesized that PTSD symptom reductions would be associated with improvements in pain and health symptoms following CPT. This secondary, intent-to-treat analysis included data from a parent trial of 127 active duty U.S. Army soldiers diagnosed with PTSD who were receiving variable-length CPT. We used mixed-effect regression models with repeated measures to examine whether treatment responders (i.e., individuals with a reduction of 11 points or more on the PCL-5) demonstrated improvements in pain and health outcomes posttreatment. Models included fixed effects of visit (baseline and 1-month follow-up), clinically significant PTSD improvement classification (present or absent), and the respective interaction. There were significant interactions on pain interference, F(1, 75.92) = 6.32, p = .014; perceived life control, F(1, 95.59) = 5.17, p = .025; affective distress, F(1, 83.15) = 9.77 p = .002; mental health, F(1, 96.27) = 20.75, p < .001; physical health, F(1, 84.97) = 3.98, p = .049; and somatic symptoms, F(1, 80.64) = 6.08, p = .016. These interactions revealed that participants with clinically significant PTSD improvement following CPT also demonstrated certain better pain and health outcomes compared to nonresponders. Service members with pain and health issues in addition to PTSD who respond to CPT may also report improvements in these issues posttreatment, increasing the value of connecting them to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in pain and related health outcomes after cognitive processing therapy in an active duty military sample.\",\"authors\":\"Norah C Hass, Jennifer Schuster Wachen, Casey L Straud, Erica Checko, Donald D McGeary, Cindy A McGeary, Jim Mintz, Brett T Litz, Stacey Young-McCaughan, Jeffrey S Yarvis, Alan L Peterson, Patricia A Resick\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jts.23143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study explored the association between changes in pain and related health outcomes and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms following cognitive processing therapy (CPT) in an active duty military sample. Based on the mutual maintenance model, we hypothesized that PTSD symptom reductions would be associated with improvements in pain and health symptoms following CPT. This secondary, intent-to-treat analysis included data from a parent trial of 127 active duty U.S. Army soldiers diagnosed with PTSD who were receiving variable-length CPT. We used mixed-effect regression models with repeated measures to examine whether treatment responders (i.e., individuals with a reduction of 11 points or more on the PCL-5) demonstrated improvements in pain and health outcomes posttreatment. Models included fixed effects of visit (baseline and 1-month follow-up), clinically significant PTSD improvement classification (present or absent), and the respective interaction. There were significant interactions on pain interference, F(1, 75.92) = 6.32, p = .014; perceived life control, F(1, 95.59) = 5.17, p = .025; affective distress, F(1, 83.15) = 9.77 p = .002; mental health, F(1, 96.27) = 20.75, p < .001; physical health, F(1, 84.97) = 3.98, p = .049; and somatic symptoms, F(1, 80.64) = 6.08, p = .016. These interactions revealed that participants with clinically significant PTSD improvement following CPT also demonstrated certain better pain and health outcomes compared to nonresponders. Service members with pain and health issues in addition to PTSD who respond to CPT may also report improvements in these issues posttreatment, increasing the value of connecting them to treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of traumatic stress\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of traumatic stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.23143\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traumatic stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.23143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究以现役军人为样本,探讨认知加工治疗(CPT)后疼痛和相关健康结果的变化与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的关系。基于相互维持模型,我们假设创伤后应激障碍症状的减轻与CPT后疼痛和健康症状的改善有关。这项次要的意向治疗分析包括了127名被诊断患有创伤后应激障碍的美国陆军现役士兵接受可变长度CPT的父母试验数据。我们使用重复测量的混合效应回归模型来检查治疗应答者(即PCL-5得分降低11分或更多的个体)是否在治疗后表现出疼痛和健康结果的改善。模型包括就诊的固定效应(基线和1个月随访)、临床显著的PTSD改善分类(存在或不存在)以及各自的相互作用。疼痛干扰有显著交互作用,F(1,75.92) = 6.32, p = 0.014;感知生活控制,F(1,95.59) = 5.17, p = 0.025;情感痛苦,F(1, 83.15) = 9.77 p = 0.002;心理健康,F(1,96.27) = 20.75, p
Changes in pain and related health outcomes after cognitive processing therapy in an active duty military sample.
This study explored the association between changes in pain and related health outcomes and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms following cognitive processing therapy (CPT) in an active duty military sample. Based on the mutual maintenance model, we hypothesized that PTSD symptom reductions would be associated with improvements in pain and health symptoms following CPT. This secondary, intent-to-treat analysis included data from a parent trial of 127 active duty U.S. Army soldiers diagnosed with PTSD who were receiving variable-length CPT. We used mixed-effect regression models with repeated measures to examine whether treatment responders (i.e., individuals with a reduction of 11 points or more on the PCL-5) demonstrated improvements in pain and health outcomes posttreatment. Models included fixed effects of visit (baseline and 1-month follow-up), clinically significant PTSD improvement classification (present or absent), and the respective interaction. There were significant interactions on pain interference, F(1, 75.92) = 6.32, p = .014; perceived life control, F(1, 95.59) = 5.17, p = .025; affective distress, F(1, 83.15) = 9.77 p = .002; mental health, F(1, 96.27) = 20.75, p < .001; physical health, F(1, 84.97) = 3.98, p = .049; and somatic symptoms, F(1, 80.64) = 6.08, p = .016. These interactions revealed that participants with clinically significant PTSD improvement following CPT also demonstrated certain better pain and health outcomes compared to nonresponders. Service members with pain and health issues in addition to PTSD who respond to CPT may also report improvements in these issues posttreatment, increasing the value of connecting them to treatment.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Traumatic Stress (JTS) is published for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress , the official publication for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on biopsychosocial aspects of trauma. Papers focus on theoretical formulations, research, treatment, prevention education/training, and legal and policy concerns. Journal of Traumatic Stress serves as a primary reference for professionals who study and treat people exposed to highly stressful and traumatic events (directly or through their occupational roles), such as war, disaster, accident, violence or abuse (criminal or familial), hostage-taking, or life-threatening illness. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, review papers, commentaries, and, from time to time, special issues devoted to a single topic.