重新评估广泛导管内成分(EIC)在现代乳腺癌治疗中的相关性。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Seyed Reza Taha, Fouad Boulos
{"title":"重新评估广泛导管内成分(EIC)在现代乳腺癌治疗中的相关性。","authors":"Seyed Reza Taha, Fouad Boulos","doi":"10.1136/jcp-2024-209973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of extensive intraductal component (EIC), currently defined by the presence of a prominent ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) component within an invasive tumor and extending beyond its margins, was introduced in the 1980s as a predictor of local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for invasive breast carcinoma. At the time, surgical excision to negative margins was not the standard of care, making EIC a valuable tool for identifying patients at risk of recurrence. However, with modern oncologic and surgical advancements, its clinical relevance has diminished. Despite its continued inclusion as a mandatory entry in the CAP synoptic checklist, studies have shown that EIC does not independently predict local recurrence when margins are negative. Instead, objective parameters such as DCIS size and nuclear grade more accurately correlate with margin status and recurrence risk. While EIC may still be useful in preoperative biopsy assessments for evaluating disease extent among other things, its routine reporting in resection specimens appears less informative. Given its vague definition and limited prognostic value, we propose that EIC reporting should be discretionary rather than mandatory, with emphasis placed on more objective and clinically relevant metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":15391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"361-363"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-evaluating the relevance of extensive intraductal component (EIC) in modern breast cancer management.\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Reza Taha, Fouad Boulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jcp-2024-209973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The concept of extensive intraductal component (EIC), currently defined by the presence of a prominent ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) component within an invasive tumor and extending beyond its margins, was introduced in the 1980s as a predictor of local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for invasive breast carcinoma. At the time, surgical excision to negative margins was not the standard of care, making EIC a valuable tool for identifying patients at risk of recurrence. However, with modern oncologic and surgical advancements, its clinical relevance has diminished. Despite its continued inclusion as a mandatory entry in the CAP synoptic checklist, studies have shown that EIC does not independently predict local recurrence when margins are negative. Instead, objective parameters such as DCIS size and nuclear grade more accurately correlate with margin status and recurrence risk. While EIC may still be useful in preoperative biopsy assessments for evaluating disease extent among other things, its routine reporting in resection specimens appears less informative. Given its vague definition and limited prognostic value, we propose that EIC reporting should be discretionary rather than mandatory, with emphasis placed on more objective and clinically relevant metrics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"361-363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2024-209973\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2024-209973","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

广泛导管内成分(EIC)的概念,目前定义为浸润性肿瘤内存在突出的导管原位癌(DCIS)成分并扩展到其边缘以外,是在20世纪80年代引入的,作为浸润性乳腺癌保乳治疗后局部复发的预测指标。当时,手术切除到阴性切缘并不是标准的治疗方法,这使得EIC成为识别复发风险患者的有价值的工具。然而,随着现代肿瘤学和外科技术的进步,其临床相关性已经减弱。尽管EIC继续作为CAP概要检查表的强制性条目,但研究表明,当切缘为阴性时,EIC不能独立预测局部复发。相反,客观参数如DCIS大小和核分级更准确地与切缘状态和复发风险相关。虽然EIC在术前活检评估中仍可用于评估疾病程度等,但其在切除标本中的常规报告似乎信息较少。鉴于其模糊的定义和有限的预后价值,我们建议EIC报告应该是自由裁量的而不是强制性的,重点放在更客观和临床相关的指标上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-evaluating the relevance of extensive intraductal component (EIC) in modern breast cancer management.

The concept of extensive intraductal component (EIC), currently defined by the presence of a prominent ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) component within an invasive tumor and extending beyond its margins, was introduced in the 1980s as a predictor of local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for invasive breast carcinoma. At the time, surgical excision to negative margins was not the standard of care, making EIC a valuable tool for identifying patients at risk of recurrence. However, with modern oncologic and surgical advancements, its clinical relevance has diminished. Despite its continued inclusion as a mandatory entry in the CAP synoptic checklist, studies have shown that EIC does not independently predict local recurrence when margins are negative. Instead, objective parameters such as DCIS size and nuclear grade more accurately correlate with margin status and recurrence risk. While EIC may still be useful in preoperative biopsy assessments for evaluating disease extent among other things, its routine reporting in resection specimens appears less informative. Given its vague definition and limited prognostic value, we propose that EIC reporting should be discretionary rather than mandatory, with emphasis placed on more objective and clinically relevant metrics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
113
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Pathology is a leading international journal covering all aspects of pathology. Diagnostic and research areas covered include histopathology, virology, haematology, microbiology, cytopathology, chemical pathology, molecular pathology, forensic pathology, dermatopathology, neuropathology and immunopathology. Each issue contains Reviews, Original articles, Short reports, Correspondence and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信