新诊断或复发胶质母细胞瘤渗透性血脑屏障破坏后的超选择性动脉内脑输注化疗药物:来自单中心经验的技术见解和临床结果。

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Christian Ferreira, Marcio Yuri Ferreira, Faith Singh, Tamika Wong, Sanskruti Bokil, Sara Massimo, Julianna Cavallaro, Olivia Albers, Randy D'Amico, David Langer, John Boockvar, Yafell Serulle
{"title":"新诊断或复发胶质母细胞瘤渗透性血脑屏障破坏后的超选择性动脉内脑输注化疗药物:来自单中心经验的技术见解和临床结果。","authors":"Christian Ferreira, Marcio Yuri Ferreira, Faith Singh, Tamika Wong, Sanskruti Bokil, Sara Massimo, Julianna Cavallaro, Olivia Albers, Randy D'Amico, David Langer, John Boockvar, Yafell Serulle","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-023068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM) remains one of the most challenging malignancies to treat. Since the majority of patients experience tumor recurrence (rGBM) after first-line therapy, advancements in both initial and salvage treatments are essential.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We report our single-center experience on the feasibility and safety of superselective intra-arterial cerebral infusion (SIACI) with bevacizumab or cetuximab after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (oBBBd).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Partial results of three distinct trials (anonymized for blinded review) were analyzed. All patients were histopathologically confirmed to have either ndGBM or previously diagnosed ndGBM that progressed to rGBM despite standard therapy and had aKarnofsky Performance Status (KPS)≥70. All patients were admitted on the same day of the surgery, and the intervention followed similar steps in all included patients. Under general anesthesia, after oBBBd with mannitol, patients received SIACI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 2014 and March 2024, 70 patients with a mean age of 56.2±12.4 years (range: 19-78) underwent successful treatment, encompassing 139 SIACIs and 246 infusions. All planned SIACIs were completed successfully. Forty-one patients with rGBM received bevacizumab-SIACI, 7 with ndGBM bevacizumab-SIACI, and 22 with ndGBM cetuximab-SIACI. In 133 of 139 SIACIs (95.7%), patients were discharged home with a length of stay of 1 day. The incidence of patients who experienced procedure-related and drug-related adverse events was 11.4% and 8.6%, respectively. No procedure-related deaths occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our single-center experience, comprising the largest cohort of bevacizumab or cetuximab SIACI treatment for rGBM and ndGBM, this promising and cutting-edge intervention is highly feasible and safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Superselective intra-arterial cerebral infusion of chemotherapeutics after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption in newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma: technical insights and clinical outcomes from a single-center experience.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Ferreira, Marcio Yuri Ferreira, Faith Singh, Tamika Wong, Sanskruti Bokil, Sara Massimo, Julianna Cavallaro, Olivia Albers, Randy D'Amico, David Langer, John Boockvar, Yafell Serulle\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnis-2025-023068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM) remains one of the most challenging malignancies to treat. Since the majority of patients experience tumor recurrence (rGBM) after first-line therapy, advancements in both initial and salvage treatments are essential.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We report our single-center experience on the feasibility and safety of superselective intra-arterial cerebral infusion (SIACI) with bevacizumab or cetuximab after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (oBBBd).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Partial results of three distinct trials (anonymized for blinded review) were analyzed. All patients were histopathologically confirmed to have either ndGBM or previously diagnosed ndGBM that progressed to rGBM despite standard therapy and had aKarnofsky Performance Status (KPS)≥70. All patients were admitted on the same day of the surgery, and the intervention followed similar steps in all included patients. Under general anesthesia, after oBBBd with mannitol, patients received SIACI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 2014 and March 2024, 70 patients with a mean age of 56.2±12.4 years (range: 19-78) underwent successful treatment, encompassing 139 SIACIs and 246 infusions. All planned SIACIs were completed successfully. Forty-one patients with rGBM received bevacizumab-SIACI, 7 with ndGBM bevacizumab-SIACI, and 22 with ndGBM cetuximab-SIACI. In 133 of 139 SIACIs (95.7%), patients were discharged home with a length of stay of 1 day. The incidence of patients who experienced procedure-related and drug-related adverse events was 11.4% and 8.6%, respectively. No procedure-related deaths occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our single-center experience, comprising the largest cohort of bevacizumab or cetuximab SIACI treatment for rGBM and ndGBM, this promising and cutting-edge intervention is highly feasible and safe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023068\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023068","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤(ndGBM)仍然是最具挑战性的恶性肿瘤之一。由于大多数患者在一线治疗后出现肿瘤复发(rGBM),因此在初始治疗和挽救治疗方面取得进展至关重要。目的:我们报告了渗透性血脑屏障破坏(oBBBd)后使用贝伐单抗或西妥昔单抗进行超选择性动脉脑输注(SIACI)的可行性和安全性的单中心经验。方法:对三个不同试验的部分结果(匿名进行盲法评价)进行分析。所有患者经组织病理学证实为ndGBM或先前诊断的ndGBM,尽管标准治疗仍进展为rGBM,并且aKarnofsky性能状态(KPS)≥70。所有患者在手术当天入院,所有患者的干预步骤相似。全麻下,经甘露醇oBBBd后,患者接受SIACI。结果:2014年10月至2024年3月,70例患者成功治疗,平均年龄56.2±12.4岁(范围:19-78),其中SIACIs 139例,输注246例。所有计划的siaci都成功完成。41例rGBM患者接受贝伐单抗- siaci治疗,7例ndGBM贝伐单抗- siaci治疗,22例ndGBM西妥昔单抗- siaci治疗。139例siaci中133例(95.7%)患者出院时住院时间为1天。经历手术相关和药物相关不良事件的患者发生率分别为11.4%和8.6%。未发生与手术相关的死亡。结论:在我们的单中心经验中,包括贝伐单抗或西妥昔单抗SIACI治疗rGBM和ndGBM的最大队列,这一有前景的前沿干预措施是高度可行和安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Superselective intra-arterial cerebral infusion of chemotherapeutics after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption in newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma: technical insights and clinical outcomes from a single-center experience.

Background: Newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM) remains one of the most challenging malignancies to treat. Since the majority of patients experience tumor recurrence (rGBM) after first-line therapy, advancements in both initial and salvage treatments are essential.

Objective: We report our single-center experience on the feasibility and safety of superselective intra-arterial cerebral infusion (SIACI) with bevacizumab or cetuximab after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (oBBBd).

Methods: Partial results of three distinct trials (anonymized for blinded review) were analyzed. All patients were histopathologically confirmed to have either ndGBM or previously diagnosed ndGBM that progressed to rGBM despite standard therapy and had aKarnofsky Performance Status (KPS)≥70. All patients were admitted on the same day of the surgery, and the intervention followed similar steps in all included patients. Under general anesthesia, after oBBBd with mannitol, patients received SIACI.

Results: Between October 2014 and March 2024, 70 patients with a mean age of 56.2±12.4 years (range: 19-78) underwent successful treatment, encompassing 139 SIACIs and 246 infusions. All planned SIACIs were completed successfully. Forty-one patients with rGBM received bevacizumab-SIACI, 7 with ndGBM bevacizumab-SIACI, and 22 with ndGBM cetuximab-SIACI. In 133 of 139 SIACIs (95.7%), patients were discharged home with a length of stay of 1 day. The incidence of patients who experienced procedure-related and drug-related adverse events was 11.4% and 8.6%, respectively. No procedure-related deaths occurred.

Conclusion: In our single-center experience, comprising the largest cohort of bevacizumab or cetuximab SIACI treatment for rGBM and ndGBM, this promising and cutting-edge intervention is highly feasible and safe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信