两种种植体宏观设计在不同牙槽嵴形态下的初代种植稳定性:体外研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Anna Jenner, Gabriela P Sabatini, Samir Abou-Ayash, Emilio Couso-Queiruga, Vivianne Chappuis, Clemens Raabe
{"title":"两种种植体宏观设计在不同牙槽嵴形态下的初代种植稳定性:体外研究。","authors":"Anna Jenner, Gabriela P Sabatini, Samir Abou-Ayash, Emilio Couso-Queiruga, Vivianne Chappuis, Clemens Raabe","doi":"10.1186/s40729-025-00605-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The primary aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the primary implant stability obtained in immediate and late implant placement scenarios. Secondary aims evaluated the effect of two distinct implant macro-designs and examined the correlation between resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and final insertion torque.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Partially edentulous maxillary models including six single sites simulating extraction sockets and healed alveolar ridges were used. Virtual implant planning facilitated static computer-assisted implant placement of bone level implants with either a shallow-threaded and cylindrical (BL), or deep-threaded and tapered implant macro-design (BLX). The insertion torque was continuously measured during implant placement, and RFA was performed after final implant positioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred and forty-four implants were equally distributed to two alveolar ridge morphologies and implant designs. Higher final insertion torque and RFA values were observed for implants placed in healed ridges compared to extraction sockets (40.8 ± 13.5 vs. 20.6 ± 8.4 Ncm, and RFA 70.7 ± 2.8 vs. 59.6 ± 6.5, both p < 0.001), and for BL implants compared to BLX implants (35.7 ± 13.0 vs. 25.7 ± 8.9 Ncm, and RFA 66.7 ± 4.4 vs. 63.6 ± 4.9, both p < 0.001). Insertion torque and mean RFA values positively correlated (r = 0.742; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary implant stability is significantly affected by the alveolar ridge morphology and the implant macro-design, demonstrating higher values in healed sites and shallow-threaded, cylindrical implants. Therefore, a tailored selection of the implant design depending on the implant placement and loading protocol is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":14076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","volume":"11 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary implant stability of two implant macro-designs in different alveolar ridge morphologies: an in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Jenner, Gabriela P Sabatini, Samir Abou-Ayash, Emilio Couso-Queiruga, Vivianne Chappuis, Clemens Raabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40729-025-00605-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The primary aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the primary implant stability obtained in immediate and late implant placement scenarios. Secondary aims evaluated the effect of two distinct implant macro-designs and examined the correlation between resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and final insertion torque.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Partially edentulous maxillary models including six single sites simulating extraction sockets and healed alveolar ridges were used. Virtual implant planning facilitated static computer-assisted implant placement of bone level implants with either a shallow-threaded and cylindrical (BL), or deep-threaded and tapered implant macro-design (BLX). The insertion torque was continuously measured during implant placement, and RFA was performed after final implant positioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred and forty-four implants were equally distributed to two alveolar ridge morphologies and implant designs. Higher final insertion torque and RFA values were observed for implants placed in healed ridges compared to extraction sockets (40.8 ± 13.5 vs. 20.6 ± 8.4 Ncm, and RFA 70.7 ± 2.8 vs. 59.6 ± 6.5, both p < 0.001), and for BL implants compared to BLX implants (35.7 ± 13.0 vs. 25.7 ± 8.9 Ncm, and RFA 66.7 ± 4.4 vs. 63.6 ± 4.9, both p < 0.001). Insertion torque and mean RFA values positively correlated (r = 0.742; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary implant stability is significantly affected by the alveolar ridge morphology and the implant macro-design, demonstrating higher values in healed sites and shallow-threaded, cylindrical implants. Therefore, a tailored selection of the implant design depending on the implant placement and loading protocol is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Implant Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885739/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Implant Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-025-00605-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-025-00605-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本体外研究的主要目的是研究在即刻和晚期种植体放置情况下获得的初级种植体稳定性。次要目的评估两种不同种植体宏观设计的效果,并检查共振频率分析(RFA)与最终插入扭矩之间的相关性。方法:采用6个模拟拔牙槽位和牙槽嵴愈合的上颌局部无牙模型。虚拟种植体规划促进了骨水平种植体的静态计算机辅助植入,无论是浅螺纹和圆柱形(BL),还是深螺纹和锥形种植体宏观设计(BLX)。在种植体放置过程中连续测量插入扭矩,并在最终种植体定位后进行RFA。结果:144个种植体均匀分布在两种牙槽嵴形态和种植体设计中。结论:牙槽嵴形态和种植体宏观设计显著影响初级种植体的稳定性,愈合部位和浅螺纹圆柱形种植体的最终植入扭矩和RFA值高于拔牙槽位(40.8±13.5 Ncm vs. 20.6±8.4 Ncm, RFA 70.7±2.8 Ncm vs. 59.6±6.5)。因此,建议根据种植体放置和加载方案量身定制种植体设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primary implant stability of two implant macro-designs in different alveolar ridge morphologies: an in vitro study.

Purpose: The primary aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the primary implant stability obtained in immediate and late implant placement scenarios. Secondary aims evaluated the effect of two distinct implant macro-designs and examined the correlation between resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and final insertion torque.

Methods: Partially edentulous maxillary models including six single sites simulating extraction sockets and healed alveolar ridges were used. Virtual implant planning facilitated static computer-assisted implant placement of bone level implants with either a shallow-threaded and cylindrical (BL), or deep-threaded and tapered implant macro-design (BLX). The insertion torque was continuously measured during implant placement, and RFA was performed after final implant positioning.

Results: One-hundred and forty-four implants were equally distributed to two alveolar ridge morphologies and implant designs. Higher final insertion torque and RFA values were observed for implants placed in healed ridges compared to extraction sockets (40.8 ± 13.5 vs. 20.6 ± 8.4 Ncm, and RFA 70.7 ± 2.8 vs. 59.6 ± 6.5, both p < 0.001), and for BL implants compared to BLX implants (35.7 ± 13.0 vs. 25.7 ± 8.9 Ncm, and RFA 66.7 ± 4.4 vs. 63.6 ± 4.9, both p < 0.001). Insertion torque and mean RFA values positively correlated (r = 0.742; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Primary implant stability is significantly affected by the alveolar ridge morphology and the implant macro-design, demonstrating higher values in healed sites and shallow-threaded, cylindrical implants. Therefore, a tailored selection of the implant design depending on the implant placement and loading protocol is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
International Journal of Implant Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
53
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Implant Dentistry is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal is dedicated to promoting the exchange and discussion of all research areas relevant to implant dentistry in the form of systematic literature or invited reviews, prospective and retrospective clinical studies, clinical case reports, basic laboratory and animal research, and articles on material research and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信