Aoi A Hunsaker, Kristin M Uhler, Kerry A Walker, Nathaniel T Greene, Andrew D Brown
{"title":"改进婴儿和成人骨传导听觉脑干反应的测量方法:减少刺激伪差。","authors":"Aoi A Hunsaker, Kristin M Uhler, Kerry A Walker, Nathaniel T Greene, Andrew D Brown","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2465767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To reduce the amplitude of stimulus artefacts present in bone conduction auditory brainstem response (BC ABR) measurements.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Electromagnetic shielding was applied to the surface of a clinical BC transducer. A foam pad was also placed on the shielded mastoid-contacting plate of the transducer. Acoustic impacts of these modifications were evaluated using an artificial mastoid. Unmodified and modified (shielding with pad) transducers were then used to elicit BC ABRs in adults and infants. Stimulus artefact amplitudes were compared across transducers.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Six adults (24-42 years old) and 13 typically developing infants (mean age 48.77 days) with no sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Shielding alone slightly decreased acoustic transducer output above approximately 1000 Hz. The addition of a foam pad largely negated this loss, while lower-frequency (500-1000 Hz) acoustic transducer output was slightly increased. The modified transducer produced significantly less stimulus artefact, although variation across subjects was also evident. In a clinical setting, Wave V was detected at similar rates for both transducers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While artefact was not eliminated, direct attenuation of artefact amplitude (versus software-based mitigation strategies) could simplify BC ABR and other evoked potential measurement protocols and support more stringent artefact rejection criteria to yield more informative recordings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards improved measurements of bone conduction auditory brainstem responses in infants and adults: mitigation of stimulus artefact.\",\"authors\":\"Aoi A Hunsaker, Kristin M Uhler, Kerry A Walker, Nathaniel T Greene, Andrew D Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14992027.2025.2465767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To reduce the amplitude of stimulus artefacts present in bone conduction auditory brainstem response (BC ABR) measurements.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Electromagnetic shielding was applied to the surface of a clinical BC transducer. A foam pad was also placed on the shielded mastoid-contacting plate of the transducer. Acoustic impacts of these modifications were evaluated using an artificial mastoid. Unmodified and modified (shielding with pad) transducers were then used to elicit BC ABRs in adults and infants. Stimulus artefact amplitudes were compared across transducers.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Six adults (24-42 years old) and 13 typically developing infants (mean age 48.77 days) with no sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Shielding alone slightly decreased acoustic transducer output above approximately 1000 Hz. The addition of a foam pad largely negated this loss, while lower-frequency (500-1000 Hz) acoustic transducer output was slightly increased. The modified transducer produced significantly less stimulus artefact, although variation across subjects was also evident. In a clinical setting, Wave V was detected at similar rates for both transducers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While artefact was not eliminated, direct attenuation of artefact amplitude (versus software-based mitigation strategies) could simplify BC ABR and other evoked potential measurement protocols and support more stringent artefact rejection criteria to yield more informative recordings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2025.2465767\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2025.2465767","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards improved measurements of bone conduction auditory brainstem responses in infants and adults: mitigation of stimulus artefact.
Objective: To reduce the amplitude of stimulus artefacts present in bone conduction auditory brainstem response (BC ABR) measurements.
Design: Electromagnetic shielding was applied to the surface of a clinical BC transducer. A foam pad was also placed on the shielded mastoid-contacting plate of the transducer. Acoustic impacts of these modifications were evaluated using an artificial mastoid. Unmodified and modified (shielding with pad) transducers were then used to elicit BC ABRs in adults and infants. Stimulus artefact amplitudes were compared across transducers.
Study sample: Six adults (24-42 years old) and 13 typically developing infants (mean age 48.77 days) with no sensorineural hearing loss.
Results: Shielding alone slightly decreased acoustic transducer output above approximately 1000 Hz. The addition of a foam pad largely negated this loss, while lower-frequency (500-1000 Hz) acoustic transducer output was slightly increased. The modified transducer produced significantly less stimulus artefact, although variation across subjects was also evident. In a clinical setting, Wave V was detected at similar rates for both transducers.
Conclusion: While artefact was not eliminated, direct attenuation of artefact amplitude (versus software-based mitigation strategies) could simplify BC ABR and other evoked potential measurement protocols and support more stringent artefact rejection criteria to yield more informative recordings.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.