经颈动脉重建术治疗症状性颈动脉狭窄:一项系统综述。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Francisco Garcia, Filipa Jácome, Joel Sousa, Armando Mansilha
{"title":"经颈动脉重建术治疗症状性颈动脉狭窄:一项系统综述。","authors":"Francisco Garcia, Filipa Jácome, Joel Sousa, Armando Mansilha","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05275-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Carotid endarterectomy is currently the gold standard treatment option for significant symptomatic carotid stenosis. Carotid artery stenting can be an alternative in selected patients, although with inferior results when compared with its open counterpart. Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) emerged as a new option, with promising results. This study aims to systematically review current evidence of the safety of TCAR in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was performed, according to PRISMA guidelines. Literature search was performed on the PubMed and Web of Science databases, which returned 178 studies. Eleven studies were selected. Data were extracted using predefined forms.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>A total of 28326 symptomatic patients undergoing TCAR were included for analysis. Reported TIA/stroke rates after TCAR ranged between 2.3-3.3% in-hospital and 1.2-4.3% at 30-days. Similarly, in-hospital post-operative mortality was reported in 0.5-0.7% of the cases, and 1-4.9% at 30 days. After 1 year, TIA/Stroke and death rates ranged between 3.5-3.7% and 2.5-13%, respectively. Postoperative cardiovascular events were observed in up to 2.9% of the patients among the included studies. Cranial nerve injuries were reported in up to 0.7% of the cases, while surgical and vascular access complications ranged between 1.2-6.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TCAR has shown promising results for significant symptomatic carotid stenosis treatment, and may be a relevant alternative to carotid endarterectomy, especially in high-risk patients. Further studies are required to assess the effectiveness of TCAR and its comparability with carotid endarterectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcarotid artery revascularization in symptomatic carotid stenosis: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Garcia, Filipa Jácome, Joel Sousa, Armando Mansilha\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05275-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Carotid endarterectomy is currently the gold standard treatment option for significant symptomatic carotid stenosis. Carotid artery stenting can be an alternative in selected patients, although with inferior results when compared with its open counterpart. Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) emerged as a new option, with promising results. This study aims to systematically review current evidence of the safety of TCAR in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was performed, according to PRISMA guidelines. Literature search was performed on the PubMed and Web of Science databases, which returned 178 studies. Eleven studies were selected. Data were extracted using predefined forms.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>A total of 28326 symptomatic patients undergoing TCAR were included for analysis. Reported TIA/stroke rates after TCAR ranged between 2.3-3.3% in-hospital and 1.2-4.3% at 30-days. Similarly, in-hospital post-operative mortality was reported in 0.5-0.7% of the cases, and 1-4.9% at 30 days. After 1 year, TIA/Stroke and death rates ranged between 3.5-3.7% and 2.5-13%, respectively. Postoperative cardiovascular events were observed in up to 2.9% of the patients among the included studies. Cranial nerve injuries were reported in up to 0.7% of the cases, while surgical and vascular access complications ranged between 1.2-6.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TCAR has shown promising results for significant symptomatic carotid stenosis treatment, and may be a relevant alternative to carotid endarterectomy, especially in high-risk patients. Further studies are required to assess the effectiveness of TCAR and its comparability with carotid endarterectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Angiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05275-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05275-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颈动脉内膜切除术是目前治疗显著症状性颈动脉狭窄的金标准选择。颈动脉支架植入术可以作为特定患者的一种替代方法,尽管与开放式支架植入术相比效果较差。经颈动脉血运重建术(TCAR)作为一种新的选择出现,效果良好。本研究旨在系统回顾TCAR治疗症状性颈动脉狭窄患者安全性的现有证据。证据获取:根据PRISMA指南对文献进行系统回顾。文献检索是在PubMed和Web of Science数据库中进行的,其中返回了178项研究。选择了11项研究。使用预定义的表单提取数据。证据综合:共有28326例接受TCAR治疗的有症状患者纳入分析。报道TCAR后TIA/卒中发生率在住院2.3-3.3%和30天1.2-4.3%之间。同样,住院后死亡率为0.5-0.7%,30天死亡率为1-4.9%。1年后,TIA/卒中和死亡率分别在3.5-3.7%和2.5-13%之间。在纳入的研究中,高达2.9%的患者观察到术后心血管事件。颅神经损伤发生率高达0.7%,而手术和血管通路并发症发生率在1.2-6.1%之间。结论:TCAR在治疗显著症状性颈动脉狭窄方面显示出良好的效果,可能是颈动脉内膜切除术的相关替代方案,特别是在高危患者中。需要进一步的研究来评估TCAR的有效性及其与颈动脉内膜切除术的可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcarotid artery revascularization in symptomatic carotid stenosis: a systematic review.

Introduction: Carotid endarterectomy is currently the gold standard treatment option for significant symptomatic carotid stenosis. Carotid artery stenting can be an alternative in selected patients, although with inferior results when compared with its open counterpart. Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) emerged as a new option, with promising results. This study aims to systematically review current evidence of the safety of TCAR in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

Evidence acquisition: A systematic review of the literature was performed, according to PRISMA guidelines. Literature search was performed on the PubMed and Web of Science databases, which returned 178 studies. Eleven studies were selected. Data were extracted using predefined forms.

Evidence synthesis: A total of 28326 symptomatic patients undergoing TCAR were included for analysis. Reported TIA/stroke rates after TCAR ranged between 2.3-3.3% in-hospital and 1.2-4.3% at 30-days. Similarly, in-hospital post-operative mortality was reported in 0.5-0.7% of the cases, and 1-4.9% at 30 days. After 1 year, TIA/Stroke and death rates ranged between 3.5-3.7% and 2.5-13%, respectively. Postoperative cardiovascular events were observed in up to 2.9% of the patients among the included studies. Cranial nerve injuries were reported in up to 0.7% of the cases, while surgical and vascular access complications ranged between 1.2-6.1%.

Conclusions: TCAR has shown promising results for significant symptomatic carotid stenosis treatment, and may be a relevant alternative to carotid endarterectomy, especially in high-risk patients. Further studies are required to assess the effectiveness of TCAR and its comparability with carotid endarterectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Angiology
International Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信