环境脆弱性指数框架,支持在人口普查区一级采取有针对性的公共卫生干预措施。

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Lauren B Anderson, Rochelle H Holm, Caison Black, Donald J Biddle, Weihsueh A Chiu, Aruni Bhatnagar, Ted Smith
{"title":"环境脆弱性指数框架,支持在人口普查区一级采取有针对性的公共卫生干预措施。","authors":"Lauren B Anderson, Rochelle H Holm, Caison Black, Donald J Biddle, Weihsueh A Chiu, Aruni Bhatnagar, Ted Smith","doi":"10.1038/s41370-025-00763-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Analyzing and visualizing disparities in environmental risks can help assess place-based vulnerabilities and provide civic leaders and community members with essential data for promoting health equity and informing public health strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the adaptation of a previously developed environmental vulnerability index to evaluate the cumulative impact of diverse stressors in Louisville Metro-Jefferson County, KY, with the goal of supporting multi-faceted targeted public health interventions at the census tract level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed countywide vulnerability variability using the Toxicological Prioritization Index interface across five domains with 32 publicly available data indicators, and modeled the effects of theoretical public health interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings suggest that similar vulnerable areas are not always geographically clustered. Higher vulnerability scores were observed in the western and central areas of the county, with lower scores in the eastern regions. The index enabled the selection of the most at-risk census tracts for modeling targeted public health interventions to reduce cumulative environmental vulnerability.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Environmental vulnerabilities are not invariant features of urban environments. Rather, knowledge of these risks can guide the development and implementation of targeted solutions. This analysis demonstrated how publicly available data can support selection of feasible interventions to improve environmental equity. Targeted interventions to modify environmental conditions that support health can be developed and implemented locally with greater precision at the census tract level, yielding impactful outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An environmental vulnerability index framework supporting targeted public health interventions at the census tracts level.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren B Anderson, Rochelle H Holm, Caison Black, Donald J Biddle, Weihsueh A Chiu, Aruni Bhatnagar, Ted Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41370-025-00763-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Analyzing and visualizing disparities in environmental risks can help assess place-based vulnerabilities and provide civic leaders and community members with essential data for promoting health equity and informing public health strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the adaptation of a previously developed environmental vulnerability index to evaluate the cumulative impact of diverse stressors in Louisville Metro-Jefferson County, KY, with the goal of supporting multi-faceted targeted public health interventions at the census tract level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed countywide vulnerability variability using the Toxicological Prioritization Index interface across five domains with 32 publicly available data indicators, and modeled the effects of theoretical public health interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings suggest that similar vulnerable areas are not always geographically clustered. Higher vulnerability scores were observed in the western and central areas of the county, with lower scores in the eastern regions. The index enabled the selection of the most at-risk census tracts for modeling targeted public health interventions to reduce cumulative environmental vulnerability.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Environmental vulnerabilities are not invariant features of urban environments. Rather, knowledge of these risks can guide the development and implementation of targeted solutions. This analysis demonstrated how publicly available data can support selection of feasible interventions to improve environmental equity. Targeted interventions to modify environmental conditions that support health can be developed and implemented locally with greater precision at the census tract level, yielding impactful outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-025-00763-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-025-00763-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:分析和可视化环境风险差异有助于评估基于地点的脆弱性,并为公民领导人和社区成员提供促进卫生公平和为公共卫生战略提供信息的基本数据。目的:在肯塔基州路易斯维尔Metro-Jefferson县,研究了先前开发的环境脆弱性指数的适应性,以评估不同压力源的累积影响,目的是支持人口普查区层面的多方面有针对性的公共卫生干预措施。方法:我们利用毒理学优先排序指数(Toxicological priorities Index)界面,利用32个公开数据指标,评估了全国范围内的脆弱性变异性,并对理论上的公共卫生干预措施的效果进行了建模。结果:我们的研究结果表明,相似的脆弱区域并不总是地理聚集。县西部和中部地区脆弱性得分较高,东部地区得分较低。该指数能够选择风险最大的人口普查区,对有针对性的公共卫生干预措施进行建模,以减少累积的环境脆弱性。影响:环境脆弱性不是城市环境的不变特征。相反,对这些风险的了解可以指导目标解决方案的开发和实现。这一分析表明,可公开获得的数据如何支持选择可行的干预措施,以改善环境公平。可以在人口普查区一级以更高的精度在当地制定和实施有针对性的干预措施,以改变有利于健康的环境条件,从而产生有影响的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An environmental vulnerability index framework supporting targeted public health interventions at the census tracts level.

Background: Analyzing and visualizing disparities in environmental risks can help assess place-based vulnerabilities and provide civic leaders and community members with essential data for promoting health equity and informing public health strategies.

Objective: We investigated the adaptation of a previously developed environmental vulnerability index to evaluate the cumulative impact of diverse stressors in Louisville Metro-Jefferson County, KY, with the goal of supporting multi-faceted targeted public health interventions at the census tract level.

Methods: We assessed countywide vulnerability variability using the Toxicological Prioritization Index interface across five domains with 32 publicly available data indicators, and modeled the effects of theoretical public health interventions.

Results: Our findings suggest that similar vulnerable areas are not always geographically clustered. Higher vulnerability scores were observed in the western and central areas of the county, with lower scores in the eastern regions. The index enabled the selection of the most at-risk census tracts for modeling targeted public health interventions to reduce cumulative environmental vulnerability.

Impact: Environmental vulnerabilities are not invariant features of urban environments. Rather, knowledge of these risks can guide the development and implementation of targeted solutions. This analysis demonstrated how publicly available data can support selection of feasible interventions to improve environmental equity. Targeted interventions to modify environmental conditions that support health can be developed and implemented locally with greater precision at the census tract level, yielding impactful outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (JESEE) aims to be the premier and authoritative source of information on advances in exposure science for professionals in a wide range of environmental and public health disciplines. JESEE publishes original peer-reviewed research presenting significant advances in exposure science and exposure analysis, including development and application of the latest technologies for measuring exposures, and innovative computational approaches for translating novel data streams to characterize and predict exposures. The types of papers published in the research section of JESEE are original research articles, translation studies, and correspondence. Reported results should further understanding of the relationship between environmental exposure and human health, describe evaluated novel exposure science tools, or demonstrate potential of exposure science to enable decisions and actions that promote and protect human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信