创伤青少年工作的感知负担:创伤专业人员负担量表(TPBS)的编制与心理测量学调查。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Katharina Szota, Hanna Christiansen, Josephine Maya Fuchs, Anna Swantje van der Meer
{"title":"创伤青少年工作的感知负担:创伤专业人员负担量表(TPBS)的编制与心理测量学调查。","authors":"Katharina Szota, Hanna Christiansen, Josephine Maya Fuchs, Anna Swantje van der Meer","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2470087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> It is assumed that providing trauma-informed care for children and adolescents is a major challenge for professionals in child and youth welfare, psychiatric clinics and psychotherapy practices, yet studies are scarce. This is partly due to the fact that valid instruments that capture the specific stress caused by working with traumatized youths are missing. Our study aims to present the construction and results of the psychometric investigation of a scale that addresses the concerns, strains and needs of professionals, the Trauma Professionals' Burden Scale (TPBS).<b>Methods:</b> In our cross-sectional survey with youth psychotherapists, welfare professionals and psychiatric care staff (<i>N</i> = 834), the psychometric properties of the TPBS were examined using standard item and reliability analyses, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent validity was assessed by testing the hypothesis that two TPBS subscales show high positive correlations with two established scales.<b>Results:</b> After deletion of eleven items, the remaining items of the TPBS show good discriminatory power, allowing to discriminate between participants with high or low scores, and high factor loadings. CFA results indicate fair model fit (RMSEA = .081, CFI = .81). Internal consistencies of the subscales range from <i>ω</i> = .76 to <i>ω</i> = .89. The expected correlations with the established scales are confirmed. A six-item short scale was created, showing excellent model fit (RMSEA = .047, CFI = .99) and good internal consistency (<i>ω</i> = .88).<b>Conclusions:</b> Although further validating research is required, the present study supports the psychometric validity of the TPBS enabling to assess professionals' stress associated with providing trauma-informed care for youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2470087"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The perceived burden of working with traumatized youth: construction and psychometric investigation of the Trauma Professionals' Burden Scale (TPBS).\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Szota, Hanna Christiansen, Josephine Maya Fuchs, Anna Swantje van der Meer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20008066.2025.2470087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> It is assumed that providing trauma-informed care for children and adolescents is a major challenge for professionals in child and youth welfare, psychiatric clinics and psychotherapy practices, yet studies are scarce. This is partly due to the fact that valid instruments that capture the specific stress caused by working with traumatized youths are missing. Our study aims to present the construction and results of the psychometric investigation of a scale that addresses the concerns, strains and needs of professionals, the Trauma Professionals' Burden Scale (TPBS).<b>Methods:</b> In our cross-sectional survey with youth psychotherapists, welfare professionals and psychiatric care staff (<i>N</i> = 834), the psychometric properties of the TPBS were examined using standard item and reliability analyses, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent validity was assessed by testing the hypothesis that two TPBS subscales show high positive correlations with two established scales.<b>Results:</b> After deletion of eleven items, the remaining items of the TPBS show good discriminatory power, allowing to discriminate between participants with high or low scores, and high factor loadings. CFA results indicate fair model fit (RMSEA = .081, CFI = .81). Internal consistencies of the subscales range from <i>ω</i> = .76 to <i>ω</i> = .89. The expected correlations with the established scales are confirmed. A six-item short scale was created, showing excellent model fit (RMSEA = .047, CFI = .99) and good internal consistency (<i>ω</i> = .88).<b>Conclusions:</b> Although further validating research is required, the present study supports the psychometric validity of the TPBS enabling to assess professionals' stress associated with providing trauma-informed care for youth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Psychotraumatology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"2470087\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900103/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Psychotraumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2470087\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2470087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人们认为,为儿童和青少年提供创伤知情护理是儿童和青少年福利机构、精神病诊所和心理治疗机构专业人员面临的一项重大挑战,但这方面的研究却很少。这部分是由于缺乏有效的工具来捕捉与遭受创伤的青少年一起工作时所产生的特殊压力。我们的研究旨在介绍创伤专业人员负担量表(Trauma Professionals' Burden Scale,TPBS)的构建和心理测量调查的结果:在我们对青少年心理治疗师、福利专业人员和精神科护理人员(N = 834)进行的横断面调查中,采用标准项目和信度分析、探索性因子分析和确认性因子分析(CFA)对创伤专业人员负担量表的心理测量特性进行了研究。通过检验两个 TPBS 子量表与两个已建立的量表显示高度正相关的假设,对收敛效度进行了评估:结果:删除 11 个项目后,TPBS 的剩余项目显示出良好的区分能力,能够区分得分高或低的参与者,并显示出较高的因子载荷。CFA 结果表明模型拟合度尚可(RMSEA = 0.081,CFI = 0.81)。各分量表的内部一致性从 ω = .76 到 ω = .89。与既定量表的预期相关性得到了证实。创建的六项短量表显示出极佳的模型拟合度(RMSEA = .047,CFI = .99)和良好的内部一致性(ω = .88):尽管还需要进一步的验证研究,但本研究证明了 TPBS 在评估专业人员在为青少年提供创伤知情护理时所承受压力的心理测量有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The perceived burden of working with traumatized youth: construction and psychometric investigation of the Trauma Professionals' Burden Scale (TPBS).

Background: It is assumed that providing trauma-informed care for children and adolescents is a major challenge for professionals in child and youth welfare, psychiatric clinics and psychotherapy practices, yet studies are scarce. This is partly due to the fact that valid instruments that capture the specific stress caused by working with traumatized youths are missing. Our study aims to present the construction and results of the psychometric investigation of a scale that addresses the concerns, strains and needs of professionals, the Trauma Professionals' Burden Scale (TPBS).Methods: In our cross-sectional survey with youth psychotherapists, welfare professionals and psychiatric care staff (N = 834), the psychometric properties of the TPBS were examined using standard item and reliability analyses, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent validity was assessed by testing the hypothesis that two TPBS subscales show high positive correlations with two established scales.Results: After deletion of eleven items, the remaining items of the TPBS show good discriminatory power, allowing to discriminate between participants with high or low scores, and high factor loadings. CFA results indicate fair model fit (RMSEA = .081, CFI = .81). Internal consistencies of the subscales range from ω = .76 to ω = .89. The expected correlations with the established scales are confirmed. A six-item short scale was created, showing excellent model fit (RMSEA = .047, CFI = .99) and good internal consistency (ω = .88).Conclusions: Although further validating research is required, the present study supports the psychometric validity of the TPBS enabling to assess professionals' stress associated with providing trauma-informed care for youth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信