Katharina Szota, Hanna Christiansen, Josephine Maya Fuchs, Anna Swantje van der Meer
{"title":"创伤青少年工作的感知负担:创伤专业人员负担量表(TPBS)的编制与心理测量学调查。","authors":"Katharina Szota, Hanna Christiansen, Josephine Maya Fuchs, Anna Swantje van der Meer","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2470087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> It is assumed that providing trauma-informed care for children and adolescents is a major challenge for professionals in child and youth welfare, psychiatric clinics and psychotherapy practices, yet studies are scarce. This is partly due to the fact that valid instruments that capture the specific stress caused by working with traumatized youths are missing. Our study aims to present the construction and results of the psychometric investigation of a scale that addresses the concerns, strains and needs of professionals, the Trauma Professionals' Burden Scale (TPBS).<b>Methods:</b> In our cross-sectional survey with youth psychotherapists, welfare professionals and psychiatric care staff (<i>N</i> = 834), the psychometric properties of the TPBS were examined using standard item and reliability analyses, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent validity was assessed by testing the hypothesis that two TPBS subscales show high positive correlations with two established scales.<b>Results:</b> After deletion of eleven items, the remaining items of the TPBS show good discriminatory power, allowing to discriminate between participants with high or low scores, and high factor loadings. CFA results indicate fair model fit (RMSEA = .081, CFI = .81). Internal consistencies of the subscales range from <i>ω</i> = .76 to <i>ω</i> = .89. The expected correlations with the established scales are confirmed. A six-item short scale was created, showing excellent model fit (RMSEA = .047, CFI = .99) and good internal consistency (<i>ω</i> = .88).<b>Conclusions:</b> Although further validating research is required, the present study supports the psychometric validity of the TPBS enabling to assess professionals' stress associated with providing trauma-informed care for youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2470087"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The perceived burden of working with traumatized youth: construction and psychometric investigation of the Trauma Professionals' Burden Scale (TPBS).\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Szota, Hanna Christiansen, Josephine Maya Fuchs, Anna Swantje van der Meer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20008066.2025.2470087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> It is assumed that providing trauma-informed care for children and adolescents is a major challenge for professionals in child and youth welfare, psychiatric clinics and psychotherapy practices, yet studies are scarce. This is partly due to the fact that valid instruments that capture the specific stress caused by working with traumatized youths are missing. Our study aims to present the construction and results of the psychometric investigation of a scale that addresses the concerns, strains and needs of professionals, the Trauma Professionals' Burden Scale (TPBS).<b>Methods:</b> In our cross-sectional survey with youth psychotherapists, welfare professionals and psychiatric care staff (<i>N</i> = 834), the psychometric properties of the TPBS were examined using standard item and reliability analyses, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent validity was assessed by testing the hypothesis that two TPBS subscales show high positive correlations with two established scales.<b>Results:</b> After deletion of eleven items, the remaining items of the TPBS show good discriminatory power, allowing to discriminate between participants with high or low scores, and high factor loadings. CFA results indicate fair model fit (RMSEA = .081, CFI = .81). Internal consistencies of the subscales range from <i>ω</i> = .76 to <i>ω</i> = .89. The expected correlations with the established scales are confirmed. A six-item short scale was created, showing excellent model fit (RMSEA = .047, CFI = .99) and good internal consistency (<i>ω</i> = .88).<b>Conclusions:</b> Although further validating research is required, the present study supports the psychometric validity of the TPBS enabling to assess professionals' stress associated with providing trauma-informed care for youth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Psychotraumatology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"2470087\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900103/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Psychotraumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2470087\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2470087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The perceived burden of working with traumatized youth: construction and psychometric investigation of the Trauma Professionals' Burden Scale (TPBS).
Background: It is assumed that providing trauma-informed care for children and adolescents is a major challenge for professionals in child and youth welfare, psychiatric clinics and psychotherapy practices, yet studies are scarce. This is partly due to the fact that valid instruments that capture the specific stress caused by working with traumatized youths are missing. Our study aims to present the construction and results of the psychometric investigation of a scale that addresses the concerns, strains and needs of professionals, the Trauma Professionals' Burden Scale (TPBS).Methods: In our cross-sectional survey with youth psychotherapists, welfare professionals and psychiatric care staff (N = 834), the psychometric properties of the TPBS were examined using standard item and reliability analyses, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent validity was assessed by testing the hypothesis that two TPBS subscales show high positive correlations with two established scales.Results: After deletion of eleven items, the remaining items of the TPBS show good discriminatory power, allowing to discriminate between participants with high or low scores, and high factor loadings. CFA results indicate fair model fit (RMSEA = .081, CFI = .81). Internal consistencies of the subscales range from ω = .76 to ω = .89. The expected correlations with the established scales are confirmed. A six-item short scale was created, showing excellent model fit (RMSEA = .047, CFI = .99) and good internal consistency (ω = .88).Conclusions: Although further validating research is required, the present study supports the psychometric validity of the TPBS enabling to assess professionals' stress associated with providing trauma-informed care for youth.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.