肾衰竭患者初始透析途径类型与停透死亡之间的关系

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-29 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfaf024
Jenny H C Chen, David W Johnson, Matthew A Roberts, Mark A Brown, Frank Brennan, Germaine Wong, Hicham Cheikh Hassan, Wing-Chi G Yeung, Alice Kennard, Christopher E Davies, Neil Boudville, Charmaine E Lok, Wai H Lim
{"title":"肾衰竭患者初始透析途径类型与停透死亡之间的关系","authors":"Jenny H C Chen, David W Johnson, Matthew A Roberts, Mark A Brown, Frank Brennan, Germaine Wong, Hicham Cheikh Hassan, Wing-Chi G Yeung, Alice Kennard, Christopher E Davies, Neil Boudville, Charmaine E Lok, Wai H Lim","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfaf024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients receiving haemodialysis via a central venous catheter (HD-CVC) have been shown to have an increased risk of all-cause mortality. It is unclear whether death from dialysis withdrawal is associated with the high mortality risk observed in patients initiated on HD-CVC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, we examined the association between initial dialysis access [HD-CVC, haemodialysis via arteriovenous fistula (HD-AVF), and peritoneal dialysis (PD) via PD catheter (PD-PDC)] and death from dialysis withdrawal in adult patients starting dialysis in Australia between 2005 and 2022, analysed by time-stratified adjusted Cox regression with propensity score-matched cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 47 412 incident patients followed for a median of 2.65 years (interquartile range 1.19-4.87), 8170 (17%) died from dialysis withdrawal. Compared with patients initiated on HD-AVF, patients initiated on HD-CVC were more likely to experience death from dialysis withdrawal in the first 3 years after dialysis initiation, but not after 3 years [adjusted hazard ratios 2.43 (95% confidence interval 1.95-3.02), 2.06 (1.67-2.53), 1.57 (1.40-1.76), and 1.06 (0.97-1.15) for 0-6 months, >6-12 months, >1-3 years, and >3 years after dialysis initiation, respectively]. Comparison between patients initiated on HD-CVD and PD-PDC showed similar estimates. No difference in withdrawal risk was observed between patients initiated on HD-AVF and PD-PDC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients initiated on HD-CVC were twice as likely to experience early death from dialysis withdrawal compared with patients who had initiated dialysis with HD-AVF or PD-PDC. The increased risks diminished over time and were not observed after 3 years on dialysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"18 3","pages":"sfaf024"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11879430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between initial dialysis access types and death from dialysis withdrawal in incident patients with kidney failure.\",\"authors\":\"Jenny H C Chen, David W Johnson, Matthew A Roberts, Mark A Brown, Frank Brennan, Germaine Wong, Hicham Cheikh Hassan, Wing-Chi G Yeung, Alice Kennard, Christopher E Davies, Neil Boudville, Charmaine E Lok, Wai H Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ckj/sfaf024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients receiving haemodialysis via a central venous catheter (HD-CVC) have been shown to have an increased risk of all-cause mortality. It is unclear whether death from dialysis withdrawal is associated with the high mortality risk observed in patients initiated on HD-CVC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, we examined the association between initial dialysis access [HD-CVC, haemodialysis via arteriovenous fistula (HD-AVF), and peritoneal dialysis (PD) via PD catheter (PD-PDC)] and death from dialysis withdrawal in adult patients starting dialysis in Australia between 2005 and 2022, analysed by time-stratified adjusted Cox regression with propensity score-matched cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 47 412 incident patients followed for a median of 2.65 years (interquartile range 1.19-4.87), 8170 (17%) died from dialysis withdrawal. Compared with patients initiated on HD-AVF, patients initiated on HD-CVC were more likely to experience death from dialysis withdrawal in the first 3 years after dialysis initiation, but not after 3 years [adjusted hazard ratios 2.43 (95% confidence interval 1.95-3.02), 2.06 (1.67-2.53), 1.57 (1.40-1.76), and 1.06 (0.97-1.15) for 0-6 months, >6-12 months, >1-3 years, and >3 years after dialysis initiation, respectively]. Comparison between patients initiated on HD-CVD and PD-PDC showed similar estimates. No difference in withdrawal risk was observed between patients initiated on HD-AVF and PD-PDC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients initiated on HD-CVC were twice as likely to experience early death from dialysis withdrawal compared with patients who had initiated dialysis with HD-AVF or PD-PDC. The increased risks diminished over time and were not observed after 3 years on dialysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"sfaf024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11879430/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经中心静脉导管(HD-CVC)接受血液透析的患者全因死亡风险增加。目前尚不清楚停止透析导致的死亡是否与HD-CVC患者观察到的高死亡率风险相关。方法:使用澳大利亚和新西兰透析和移植(ANZDATA)注册表,我们检查了2005年至2022年间澳大利亚开始透析的成年患者的初始透析通路[HD-CVC,通过动静脉瘘进行血液透析(HD-AVF)和通过PD导管进行腹膜透析(PD- pdc)]与透析停透死亡之间的关系,并通过时间分层调整Cox回归分析倾向评分匹配队列。结果:47412例患者中位随访2.65年(四分位数间差1.19-4.87),8170例(17%)患者死于停止透析。与开始接受HD-AVF治疗的患者相比,开始接受HD-CVC治疗的患者在透析开始后的前3年内更有可能因停止透析而死亡,而在3年后则没有[透析开始后0-6个月、>6-12个月、>1-3年和>3年的校正风险比分别为2.43(95%置信区间1.95-3.02)、2.06(1.67-2.53)、1.57(1.40-1.76)和1.06(0.97-1.15)]。开始接受HD-CVD和PD-PDC治疗的患者之间的比较显示出相似的估计。在开始使用HD-AVF和PD-PDC的患者中,停药风险没有差异。结论:与以HD-AVF或PD-PDC开始透析的患者相比,以HD-CVC开始透析的患者因停止透析而早期死亡的可能性是其两倍。随着时间的推移,增加的风险逐渐减少,透析3年后没有观察到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations between initial dialysis access types and death from dialysis withdrawal in incident patients with kidney failure.

Background: Patients receiving haemodialysis via a central venous catheter (HD-CVC) have been shown to have an increased risk of all-cause mortality. It is unclear whether death from dialysis withdrawal is associated with the high mortality risk observed in patients initiated on HD-CVC.

Methods: Using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, we examined the association between initial dialysis access [HD-CVC, haemodialysis via arteriovenous fistula (HD-AVF), and peritoneal dialysis (PD) via PD catheter (PD-PDC)] and death from dialysis withdrawal in adult patients starting dialysis in Australia between 2005 and 2022, analysed by time-stratified adjusted Cox regression with propensity score-matched cohorts.

Results: Of 47 412 incident patients followed for a median of 2.65 years (interquartile range 1.19-4.87), 8170 (17%) died from dialysis withdrawal. Compared with patients initiated on HD-AVF, patients initiated on HD-CVC were more likely to experience death from dialysis withdrawal in the first 3 years after dialysis initiation, but not after 3 years [adjusted hazard ratios 2.43 (95% confidence interval 1.95-3.02), 2.06 (1.67-2.53), 1.57 (1.40-1.76), and 1.06 (0.97-1.15) for 0-6 months, >6-12 months, >1-3 years, and >3 years after dialysis initiation, respectively]. Comparison between patients initiated on HD-CVD and PD-PDC showed similar estimates. No difference in withdrawal risk was observed between patients initiated on HD-AVF and PD-PDC.

Conclusions: Patients initiated on HD-CVC were twice as likely to experience early death from dialysis withdrawal compared with patients who had initiated dialysis with HD-AVF or PD-PDC. The increased risks diminished over time and were not observed after 3 years on dialysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信