Chin-Ho Wong, Michael Ku Hung Hsieh, Kunihiko Nohira
{"title":"手术显微镜下上睑下垂矫正术。","authors":"Chin-Ho Wong, Michael Ku Hung Hsieh, Kunihiko Nohira","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04750-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Eyelid blepharoptosis correction is commonly performed with loupe magnification. The posture in which this operation is performed, with cervical spine flexion and forward lean, places significant stress on the cervical spine.</p><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Performing upper eyelid surgery under the operating microscope is not commonly practiced. The benefits are significantly better surgeon’s posture while operating and potential improved surgical outcomes. These ergonomic and outcome measures were examined in this prospective study.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>From the June 2023 to June 2024, 86 cases of bilateral ptosis correction were performed (172 eyelids) with the microscope.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean duration of surgery was 115 minutes for bilateral ptosis correction. Our revision rate was 3%. We found the following surgical advantages with this approach: (1) Superior visual clarity with a higher and adjustable magnification and (2) consistent confocal illumination of the operative field, (3) improved precision of dissection, (4) hemostasis and (5) clear distinction of fine anatomical structures crucial to reconstructive success. The postoperative recovery was faster with better functional and cosmetic outcomes as bruising and edema was minimized from less induction of surgical trauma. Importantly as well, for the surgeon, the operating microscope may extend the longevity of one’s surgical career. The postural ergonomics and cervical unloading afforded by the operating microscope can mitigate cervical spine stress and injury</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We found 2 compelling benefits with this approach. Firstly, the surgical outcomes were superior. Secondly, the surgeon’s posture is upright while operating. This long-term benefits of this could not be overstated in preventing cervical spine injuries.</p><h3>Level of Evidence IV</h3><p>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":"49 7","pages":"1850 - 1856"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Upper Eyelid Blepharoptosis Correction Performed Under the Operating Microscope\",\"authors\":\"Chin-Ho Wong, Michael Ku Hung Hsieh, Kunihiko Nohira\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00266-025-04750-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Eyelid blepharoptosis correction is commonly performed with loupe magnification. The posture in which this operation is performed, with cervical spine flexion and forward lean, places significant stress on the cervical spine.</p><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Performing upper eyelid surgery under the operating microscope is not commonly practiced. The benefits are significantly better surgeon’s posture while operating and potential improved surgical outcomes. These ergonomic and outcome measures were examined in this prospective study.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>From the June 2023 to June 2024, 86 cases of bilateral ptosis correction were performed (172 eyelids) with the microscope.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean duration of surgery was 115 minutes for bilateral ptosis correction. Our revision rate was 3%. We found the following surgical advantages with this approach: (1) Superior visual clarity with a higher and adjustable magnification and (2) consistent confocal illumination of the operative field, (3) improved precision of dissection, (4) hemostasis and (5) clear distinction of fine anatomical structures crucial to reconstructive success. The postoperative recovery was faster with better functional and cosmetic outcomes as bruising and edema was minimized from less induction of surgical trauma. Importantly as well, for the surgeon, the operating microscope may extend the longevity of one’s surgical career. The postural ergonomics and cervical unloading afforded by the operating microscope can mitigate cervical spine stress and injury</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We found 2 compelling benefits with this approach. Firstly, the surgical outcomes were superior. Secondly, the surgeon’s posture is upright while operating. This long-term benefits of this could not be overstated in preventing cervical spine injuries.</p><h3>Level of Evidence IV</h3><p>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"49 7\",\"pages\":\"1850 - 1856\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00266-025-04750-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00266-025-04750-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Upper Eyelid Blepharoptosis Correction Performed Under the Operating Microscope
Background
Eyelid blepharoptosis correction is commonly performed with loupe magnification. The posture in which this operation is performed, with cervical spine flexion and forward lean, places significant stress on the cervical spine.
Objectives
Performing upper eyelid surgery under the operating microscope is not commonly practiced. The benefits are significantly better surgeon’s posture while operating and potential improved surgical outcomes. These ergonomic and outcome measures were examined in this prospective study.
Methods
From the June 2023 to June 2024, 86 cases of bilateral ptosis correction were performed (172 eyelids) with the microscope.
Results
The mean duration of surgery was 115 minutes for bilateral ptosis correction. Our revision rate was 3%. We found the following surgical advantages with this approach: (1) Superior visual clarity with a higher and adjustable magnification and (2) consistent confocal illumination of the operative field, (3) improved precision of dissection, (4) hemostasis and (5) clear distinction of fine anatomical structures crucial to reconstructive success. The postoperative recovery was faster with better functional and cosmetic outcomes as bruising and edema was minimized from less induction of surgical trauma. Importantly as well, for the surgeon, the operating microscope may extend the longevity of one’s surgical career. The postural ergonomics and cervical unloading afforded by the operating microscope can mitigate cervical spine stress and injury
Conclusions
We found 2 compelling benefits with this approach. Firstly, the surgical outcomes were superior. Secondly, the surgeon’s posture is upright while operating. This long-term benefits of this could not be overstated in preventing cervical spine injuries.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP).
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.