手术显微镜下上睑下垂矫正术。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Chin-Ho Wong, Michael Ku Hung Hsieh, Kunihiko Nohira
{"title":"手术显微镜下上睑下垂矫正术。","authors":"Chin-Ho Wong,&nbsp;Michael Ku Hung Hsieh,&nbsp;Kunihiko Nohira","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04750-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Eyelid blepharoptosis correction is commonly performed with loupe magnification. The posture in which this operation is performed, with cervical spine flexion and forward lean, places significant stress on the cervical spine.</p><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Performing upper eyelid surgery under the operating microscope is not commonly practiced. The benefits are significantly better surgeon’s posture while operating and potential improved surgical outcomes. These ergonomic and outcome measures were examined in this prospective study.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>From the June 2023 to June 2024, 86 cases of bilateral ptosis correction were performed (172 eyelids) with the microscope.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean duration of surgery was 115 minutes for bilateral ptosis correction. Our revision rate was 3%. We found the following surgical advantages with this approach: (1) Superior visual clarity with a higher and adjustable magnification and (2) consistent confocal illumination of the operative field, (3) improved precision of dissection, (4) hemostasis and (5) clear distinction of fine anatomical structures crucial to reconstructive success. The postoperative recovery was faster with better functional and cosmetic outcomes as bruising and edema was minimized from less induction of surgical trauma. Importantly as well, for the surgeon, the operating microscope may extend the longevity of one’s surgical career. The postural ergonomics and cervical unloading afforded by the operating microscope can mitigate cervical spine stress and injury</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We found 2 compelling benefits with this approach. Firstly, the surgical outcomes were superior. Secondly, the surgeon’s posture is upright while operating. This long-term benefits of this could not be overstated in preventing cervical spine injuries.</p><h3>Level of Evidence IV</h3><p>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":"49 7","pages":"1850 - 1856"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Upper Eyelid Blepharoptosis Correction Performed Under the Operating Microscope\",\"authors\":\"Chin-Ho Wong,&nbsp;Michael Ku Hung Hsieh,&nbsp;Kunihiko Nohira\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00266-025-04750-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Eyelid blepharoptosis correction is commonly performed with loupe magnification. The posture in which this operation is performed, with cervical spine flexion and forward lean, places significant stress on the cervical spine.</p><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Performing upper eyelid surgery under the operating microscope is not commonly practiced. The benefits are significantly better surgeon’s posture while operating and potential improved surgical outcomes. These ergonomic and outcome measures were examined in this prospective study.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>From the June 2023 to June 2024, 86 cases of bilateral ptosis correction were performed (172 eyelids) with the microscope.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean duration of surgery was 115 minutes for bilateral ptosis correction. Our revision rate was 3%. We found the following surgical advantages with this approach: (1) Superior visual clarity with a higher and adjustable magnification and (2) consistent confocal illumination of the operative field, (3) improved precision of dissection, (4) hemostasis and (5) clear distinction of fine anatomical structures crucial to reconstructive success. The postoperative recovery was faster with better functional and cosmetic outcomes as bruising and edema was minimized from less induction of surgical trauma. Importantly as well, for the surgeon, the operating microscope may extend the longevity of one’s surgical career. The postural ergonomics and cervical unloading afforded by the operating microscope can mitigate cervical spine stress and injury</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We found 2 compelling benefits with this approach. Firstly, the surgical outcomes were superior. Secondly, the surgeon’s posture is upright while operating. This long-term benefits of this could not be overstated in preventing cervical spine injuries.</p><h3>Level of Evidence IV</h3><p>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"49 7\",\"pages\":\"1850 - 1856\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00266-025-04750-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00266-025-04750-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:眼睑上睑下垂矫正通常采用放大镜。该手术的姿势是颈椎屈曲和前倾,这对颈椎造成了很大的压力。目的:在手术显微镜下进行上睑手术并不常见。其好处是外科医生在手术时的姿势明显更好,并有可能改善手术结果。在这项前瞻性研究中检查了这些符合人体工程学和结果的措施。方法:自2023年6月至2024年6月,对86例(172眼皮)双侧上睑下垂进行显微镜矫正。结果:双侧上睑下垂矫正术平均手术时间为115分钟。我们的修正率是3%。我们发现该方法具有以下手术优势:(1)更高可调的放大倍率和(2)手术视野一致的共聚焦照明,(3)提高解剖精度,(4)止血,(5)清晰区分对重建成功至关重要的精细解剖结构。术后恢复更快,功能和美容效果更好,因为瘀伤和水肿减少,手术创伤减少。同样重要的是,对于外科医生来说,手术显微镜可以延长他们手术生涯的寿命。手术显微镜下的体位工效学和颈椎卸载可以减轻颈椎应力和损伤。结论:我们发现这种方法有两个显著的好处。首先,手术效果较好。其次,手术时,医生的姿势是直立的。在预防颈椎损伤方面,这种长期的益处不能被夸大。证据等级iv:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定一个证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Upper Eyelid Blepharoptosis Correction Performed Under the Operating Microscope

Background

Eyelid blepharoptosis correction is commonly performed with loupe magnification. The posture in which this operation is performed, with cervical spine flexion and forward lean, places significant stress on the cervical spine.

Objectives

Performing upper eyelid surgery under the operating microscope is not commonly practiced. The benefits are significantly better surgeon’s posture while operating and potential improved surgical outcomes. These ergonomic and outcome measures were examined in this prospective study.

Methods

From the June 2023 to June 2024, 86 cases of bilateral ptosis correction were performed (172 eyelids) with the microscope.

Results

The mean duration of surgery was 115 minutes for bilateral ptosis correction. Our revision rate was 3%. We found the following surgical advantages with this approach: (1) Superior visual clarity with a higher and adjustable magnification and (2) consistent confocal illumination of the operative field, (3) improved precision of dissection, (4) hemostasis and (5) clear distinction of fine anatomical structures crucial to reconstructive success. The postoperative recovery was faster with better functional and cosmetic outcomes as bruising and edema was minimized from less induction of surgical trauma. Importantly as well, for the surgeon, the operating microscope may extend the longevity of one’s surgical career. The postural ergonomics and cervical unloading afforded by the operating microscope can mitigate cervical spine stress and injury

Conclusions

We found 2 compelling benefits with this approach. Firstly, the surgical outcomes were superior. Secondly, the surgeon’s posture is upright while operating. This long-term benefits of this could not be overstated in preventing cervical spine injuries.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信