Theodor Mareş, Guido Firmani, Cristian Radu Jecan, Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo, Michail Sorotos
{"title":"不同药物对小鼠模型小型化乳房植入物周围胶囊形成的影响——系统综述。","authors":"Theodor Mareş, Guido Firmani, Cristian Radu Jecan, Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo, Michail Sorotos","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04742-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast implants (BIs) lead to the formation of a periprosthetic capsule, causing complications like capsular contracture. Gel bleeding, involving minor silicone gel leakage through the intact implant shell, significantly promotes capsular contracture. Various pharmacological and surface treatment strategies have been explored to mitigate these issues.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review assesses the effectiveness of different pharmacological interventions and BIs surface coatings on periprosthetic capsule development in murine models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review adhering to the PRISMA protocol was conducted. Databases searched included PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and LILACS using keywords: (Murine) AND (Breast) AND/OR (Implant), covering studies from 1977 to 2022. Experimental studies on miniature breast implants in murine models involving medications, surface treatments, or post-surgical therapies were included. Exclusions were studies without pharmacological agents, those testing bacterial contamination, radiotherapy, or involving different animal models or humans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine articles were reviewed. Significant reductions in capsule thickness and inflammation were noted with certain pharmacological treatments. Corticosteroids and immunosuppressants were effective but raised concerns about wound healing and tumor recurrence. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) showed promise in reducing capsule formation, especially in textured implants. Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) enhanced tissue integration and reduced complications regardless of texture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advancements have been made in therapies to influence capsular formation around silicone implants. However, clinical validation remains limited due to small sample sizes and short study periods. ADMs and LTRAs appear most promising, warranting further long-term clinical studies to fully understand their potential benefits in improving breast implant biocompatibility.</p><p><strong>No level assigned: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Different Medications on Capsule Formation Around Miniaturized Breast Implants in Murine Models-a Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Theodor Mareş, Guido Firmani, Cristian Radu Jecan, Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo, Michail Sorotos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00266-025-04742-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast implants (BIs) lead to the formation of a periprosthetic capsule, causing complications like capsular contracture. Gel bleeding, involving minor silicone gel leakage through the intact implant shell, significantly promotes capsular contracture. Various pharmacological and surface treatment strategies have been explored to mitigate these issues.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review assesses the effectiveness of different pharmacological interventions and BIs surface coatings on periprosthetic capsule development in murine models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review adhering to the PRISMA protocol was conducted. Databases searched included PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and LILACS using keywords: (Murine) AND (Breast) AND/OR (Implant), covering studies from 1977 to 2022. Experimental studies on miniature breast implants in murine models involving medications, surface treatments, or post-surgical therapies were included. Exclusions were studies without pharmacological agents, those testing bacterial contamination, radiotherapy, or involving different animal models or humans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine articles were reviewed. Significant reductions in capsule thickness and inflammation were noted with certain pharmacological treatments. Corticosteroids and immunosuppressants were effective but raised concerns about wound healing and tumor recurrence. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) showed promise in reducing capsule formation, especially in textured implants. Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) enhanced tissue integration and reduced complications regardless of texture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advancements have been made in therapies to influence capsular formation around silicone implants. However, clinical validation remains limited due to small sample sizes and short study periods. ADMs and LTRAs appear most promising, warranting further long-term clinical studies to fully understand their potential benefits in improving breast implant biocompatibility.</p><p><strong>No level assigned: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04742-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04742-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:乳房植入物(BIs)导致假体周围包膜的形成,引起包膜挛缩等并发症。凝胶出血,包括轻微的硅胶渗漏通过完整的种植体外壳,显著促进包膜挛缩。各种药理学和表面处理策略已被探索以减轻这些问题。目的:本文综述了不同药物干预和BIs表面涂层对小鼠假体周围胶囊发育的影响。方法:按照PRISMA方案进行系统评价。检索的数据库包括PubMed、谷歌Scholar、Cochrane Library和LILACS,检索关键词为:(mouse) and (Breast) and /OR (Implant),涵盖1977年至2022年的研究。包括小鼠模型微型乳房植入物的药物、表面处理或术后治疗的实验研究。排除的研究包括不使用药物、检测细菌污染、放射治疗或涉及不同动物模型或人类的研究。结果:共纳入29篇文献。某些药物治疗显著减少了胶囊厚度和炎症。皮质类固醇和免疫抑制剂是有效的,但引起了对伤口愈合和肿瘤复发的担忧。白三烯受体拮抗剂(LTRA)显示出减少胶囊形成的希望,特别是在有纹理的种植体中。脱细胞真皮基质(ADMs)增强组织整合,减少并发症,无论质地如何。结论:影响硅胶植入物周围囊膜形成的治疗方法已取得进展。然而,由于样本量小,研究时间短,临床验证仍然有限。ADMs和LTRAs似乎是最有希望的,需要进一步的长期临床研究来充分了解它们在改善乳房植入物生物相容性方面的潜在益处。未指定水平:本刊要求作者为每份投稿指定证据水平,以适用循证医学排名。这不包括评论文章、书评和涉及基础科学、动物研究、尸体研究和实验研究的手稿。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
Effect of Different Medications on Capsule Formation Around Miniaturized Breast Implants in Murine Models-a Systematic Review.
Background: Breast implants (BIs) lead to the formation of a periprosthetic capsule, causing complications like capsular contracture. Gel bleeding, involving minor silicone gel leakage through the intact implant shell, significantly promotes capsular contracture. Various pharmacological and surface treatment strategies have been explored to mitigate these issues.
Objectives: This review assesses the effectiveness of different pharmacological interventions and BIs surface coatings on periprosthetic capsule development in murine models.
Methods: A systematic review adhering to the PRISMA protocol was conducted. Databases searched included PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and LILACS using keywords: (Murine) AND (Breast) AND/OR (Implant), covering studies from 1977 to 2022. Experimental studies on miniature breast implants in murine models involving medications, surface treatments, or post-surgical therapies were included. Exclusions were studies without pharmacological agents, those testing bacterial contamination, radiotherapy, or involving different animal models or humans.
Results: Twenty-nine articles were reviewed. Significant reductions in capsule thickness and inflammation were noted with certain pharmacological treatments. Corticosteroids and immunosuppressants were effective but raised concerns about wound healing and tumor recurrence. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) showed promise in reducing capsule formation, especially in textured implants. Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) enhanced tissue integration and reduced complications regardless of texture.
Conclusions: Advancements have been made in therapies to influence capsular formation around silicone implants. However, clinical validation remains limited due to small sample sizes and short study periods. ADMs and LTRAs appear most promising, warranting further long-term clinical studies to fully understand their potential benefits in improving breast implant biocompatibility.
No level assigned: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP).
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.