Yanghang Ren, Han Wang, Sandy P. Harrison, I. Colin Prentice, Giulia Mengoli, Long Zhao, Peter B. Reich, Kun Yang
{"title":"将光合作用和叶呼吸驯化纳入Noah-MP陆面模式:模式开发与评价","authors":"Yanghang Ren, Han Wang, Sandy P. Harrison, I. Colin Prentice, Giulia Mengoli, Long Zhao, Peter B. Reich, Kun Yang","doi":"10.1029/2024MS004599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Realistic simulation of leaf photosynthetic and respiratory processes is needed for accurate prediction of the global carbon cycle. These two processes systematically acclimate to long-term environmental changes by adjusting photosynthetic and respiratory traits (e.g., the maximum photosynthetic capacity at 25°C (<i>V</i><sub>cmax,25</sub>) and the leaf respiration rate at 25°C (<i>R</i><sub>25</sub>)) following increasingly well-understood principles. While some land surface models (LSMs) now account for thermal acclimation, they do so by assigning empirical parameterizations for individual plant functional types (PFTs). Here, we have implemented an Eco-Evolutionary Optimality (EEO)-based scheme to represent the universal acclimation of photosynthesis and leaf respiration to multiple environmental effects, and that therefore requires no PFT-specific parameterizations, in a standard version of the widely used LSM, Noah MP. We evaluated model performance with plant trait data from a 5-year experiment and extensive global field measurements, and carbon flux measurements from FLUXNET2015. We show that observed <i>R</i><sub>25</sub> and <i>V</i><sub>cmax,25</sub> vary substantially both temporally and spatially within the same PFT (<i>C.V.</i> >20%). Our EEO-based scheme captures 62% of the temporal and 70% of the spatial variations in <i>V</i><sub>cmax,25</sub> (73% and 54% of the variations in <i>R</i><sub>25</sub>). The standard scheme underestimates gross primary production by 10% versus 2% for the EEO-based scheme and generates a larger spread in <i>r</i> (correlation coefficient) across flux sites (0.79 ± 0.16 vs. 0.84 ± 0.1, mean ± S.D.). The standard scheme greatly overestimates canopy respiration (bias: ∼200% vs. 8% for the EEO scheme), resulting in less CO<sub>2</sub> uptake by terrestrial ecosystems. Our approach thus simulates climate-carbon coupling more realistically, with fewer parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":14881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024MS004599","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating the Acclimation of Photosynthesis and Leaf Respiration in the Noah-MP Land Surface Model: Model Development and Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Yanghang Ren, Han Wang, Sandy P. Harrison, I. Colin Prentice, Giulia Mengoli, Long Zhao, Peter B. Reich, Kun Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024MS004599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Realistic simulation of leaf photosynthetic and respiratory processes is needed for accurate prediction of the global carbon cycle. These two processes systematically acclimate to long-term environmental changes by adjusting photosynthetic and respiratory traits (e.g., the maximum photosynthetic capacity at 25°C (<i>V</i><sub>cmax,25</sub>) and the leaf respiration rate at 25°C (<i>R</i><sub>25</sub>)) following increasingly well-understood principles. While some land surface models (LSMs) now account for thermal acclimation, they do so by assigning empirical parameterizations for individual plant functional types (PFTs). Here, we have implemented an Eco-Evolutionary Optimality (EEO)-based scheme to represent the universal acclimation of photosynthesis and leaf respiration to multiple environmental effects, and that therefore requires no PFT-specific parameterizations, in a standard version of the widely used LSM, Noah MP. We evaluated model performance with plant trait data from a 5-year experiment and extensive global field measurements, and carbon flux measurements from FLUXNET2015. We show that observed <i>R</i><sub>25</sub> and <i>V</i><sub>cmax,25</sub> vary substantially both temporally and spatially within the same PFT (<i>C.V.</i> >20%). Our EEO-based scheme captures 62% of the temporal and 70% of the spatial variations in <i>V</i><sub>cmax,25</sub> (73% and 54% of the variations in <i>R</i><sub>25</sub>). The standard scheme underestimates gross primary production by 10% versus 2% for the EEO-based scheme and generates a larger spread in <i>r</i> (correlation coefficient) across flux sites (0.79 ± 0.16 vs. 0.84 ± 0.1, mean ± S.D.). The standard scheme greatly overestimates canopy respiration (bias: ∼200% vs. 8% for the EEO scheme), resulting in less CO<sub>2</sub> uptake by terrestrial ecosystems. Our approach thus simulates climate-carbon coupling more realistically, with fewer parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024MS004599\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024MS004599\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024MS004599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
准确预测全球碳循环需要对叶片光合作用和呼吸过程进行真实的模拟。这两个过程通过调节光合和呼吸特性(例如,25°C时的最大光合能力(Vcmax,25)和25°C时的叶呼吸速率(R25))来系统地适应长期的环境变化。虽然一些陆地表面模式(LSMs)现在考虑了热适应,但它们是通过为单个植物功能类型(pft)分配经验参数化来实现的。在这里,我们在广泛使用的LSM标准版本Noah MP中实现了一个基于生态进化最优性(EEO)的方案来表示光合作用和叶呼吸对多种环境影响的普遍适应,因此不需要特定于pft的参数化。我们使用来自5年实验的植物性状数据、广泛的全球田间测量数据以及FLUXNET2015的碳通量测量数据来评估模型的性能。我们发现,在同一PFT内,观测到的R25和Vcmax,25在时间和空间上都有很大的变化(C.V. >20%)。我们基于eeo的方案捕获了Vcmax,25中62%的时间和70%的空间变化(R25中73%和54%的变化)。标准方案低估了总初级产量10%,而基于eeo的方案低估了2%,并且在通量站点之间产生了更大的r(相关系数)差异(0.79±0.16 vs 0.84±0.1,平均值±标准差)。标准方案大大高估了冠层呼吸(偏差:约200%,EEO方案为8%),导致陆地生态系统对二氧化碳的吸收减少。因此,我们的方法用更少的参数更真实地模拟了气候-碳耦合。
Incorporating the Acclimation of Photosynthesis and Leaf Respiration in the Noah-MP Land Surface Model: Model Development and Evaluation
Realistic simulation of leaf photosynthetic and respiratory processes is needed for accurate prediction of the global carbon cycle. These two processes systematically acclimate to long-term environmental changes by adjusting photosynthetic and respiratory traits (e.g., the maximum photosynthetic capacity at 25°C (Vcmax,25) and the leaf respiration rate at 25°C (R25)) following increasingly well-understood principles. While some land surface models (LSMs) now account for thermal acclimation, they do so by assigning empirical parameterizations for individual plant functional types (PFTs). Here, we have implemented an Eco-Evolutionary Optimality (EEO)-based scheme to represent the universal acclimation of photosynthesis and leaf respiration to multiple environmental effects, and that therefore requires no PFT-specific parameterizations, in a standard version of the widely used LSM, Noah MP. We evaluated model performance with plant trait data from a 5-year experiment and extensive global field measurements, and carbon flux measurements from FLUXNET2015. We show that observed R25 and Vcmax,25 vary substantially both temporally and spatially within the same PFT (C.V. >20%). Our EEO-based scheme captures 62% of the temporal and 70% of the spatial variations in Vcmax,25 (73% and 54% of the variations in R25). The standard scheme underestimates gross primary production by 10% versus 2% for the EEO-based scheme and generates a larger spread in r (correlation coefficient) across flux sites (0.79 ± 0.16 vs. 0.84 ± 0.1, mean ± S.D.). The standard scheme greatly overestimates canopy respiration (bias: ∼200% vs. 8% for the EEO scheme), resulting in less CO2 uptake by terrestrial ecosystems. Our approach thus simulates climate-carbon coupling more realistically, with fewer parameters.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES) is committed to advancing the science of Earth systems modeling by offering high-quality scientific research through online availability and open access licensing. JAMES invites authors and readers from the international Earth systems modeling community.
Open access. Articles are available free of charge for everyone with Internet access to view and download.
Formal peer review.
Supplemental material, such as code samples, images, and visualizations, is published at no additional charge.
No additional charge for color figures.
Modest page charges to cover production costs.
Articles published in high-quality full text PDF, HTML, and XML.
Internal and external reference linking, DOI registration, and forward linking via CrossRef.