人类生计战略对马达加斯加沿海景观的管理影响

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Katharine E. T. Thompson, Cortni Borgerson, Patricia C. Wright, Jeanne Mathilde Randriamanetsy, Niaina Nirina Mahefa Andriamavosoloarisoa, Mamy Yves Andrianantenaina, Théofrico Alexander Razafindrahasy, Ryan S. Rothman, Carter W. Daniels, Katherine J. Kling, Claire Surkis, Katheryn C. Twiss
{"title":"人类生计战略对马达加斯加沿海景观的管理影响","authors":"Katharine E. T. Thompson,&nbsp;Cortni Borgerson,&nbsp;Patricia C. Wright,&nbsp;Jeanne Mathilde Randriamanetsy,&nbsp;Niaina Nirina Mahefa Andriamavosoloarisoa,&nbsp;Mamy Yves Andrianantenaina,&nbsp;Théofrico Alexander Razafindrahasy,&nbsp;Ryan S. Rothman,&nbsp;Carter W. Daniels,&nbsp;Katherine J. Kling,&nbsp;Claire Surkis,&nbsp;Katheryn C. Twiss","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The unsustainable harvest and consumption of wild animals destabilizes both wildlife populations and the human livelihoods that depend upon them. In coastal landscapes, the overexploitation of terrestrial resources can increase pressures on marine ecosystems, and vice versa. We explore populations' ability to mitigate hunting pressure by bolstering marine livelihood strategies, assessing whether Malagasy people (or aggregated households) (1) transfer harvest pressure and consumption from oceans to forests in times of lower fisheries yields and (2) habitually exploit both marine and terrestrial resources. We also evaluate the diversity of fishers' and hunters' methods used and species targeted, as reliance on a limited range of resources elevates sensitivity to perturbations in resource access and forces people to shift <i>across</i> rather than <i>within</i> livelihood strategies when experiencing scarcity. We present data on annual marine and terrestrial wildlife use in western Madagascar, where cyclic droughts and famines exert pressure on local populations, and people depend on wild food sources from adjacent mangrove and dry forests. In a study village outside Kirindy Mitea National Park, we surveyed and interviewed 369 individuals (<i>N</i> = 89 households) and conducted 18 focus groups over 6 months (September 2018 to March 2019). We found that individual people tended to exclusively hunt or fish, and hunters pursued relatively few species with more specialized methods than fishers did. By distributing resource utilization across ecosystems, families likely increase household resilience. Therefore, conservation and alternative livelihood efforts will benefit from a regional-scale, multi-ecosystem approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management implications of human livelihood strategies on Madagascar's coastal landscapes\",\"authors\":\"Katharine E. T. Thompson,&nbsp;Cortni Borgerson,&nbsp;Patricia C. Wright,&nbsp;Jeanne Mathilde Randriamanetsy,&nbsp;Niaina Nirina Mahefa Andriamavosoloarisoa,&nbsp;Mamy Yves Andrianantenaina,&nbsp;Théofrico Alexander Razafindrahasy,&nbsp;Ryan S. Rothman,&nbsp;Carter W. Daniels,&nbsp;Katherine J. Kling,&nbsp;Claire Surkis,&nbsp;Katheryn C. Twiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/csp2.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The unsustainable harvest and consumption of wild animals destabilizes both wildlife populations and the human livelihoods that depend upon them. In coastal landscapes, the overexploitation of terrestrial resources can increase pressures on marine ecosystems, and vice versa. We explore populations' ability to mitigate hunting pressure by bolstering marine livelihood strategies, assessing whether Malagasy people (or aggregated households) (1) transfer harvest pressure and consumption from oceans to forests in times of lower fisheries yields and (2) habitually exploit both marine and terrestrial resources. We also evaluate the diversity of fishers' and hunters' methods used and species targeted, as reliance on a limited range of resources elevates sensitivity to perturbations in resource access and forces people to shift <i>across</i> rather than <i>within</i> livelihood strategies when experiencing scarcity. We present data on annual marine and terrestrial wildlife use in western Madagascar, where cyclic droughts and famines exert pressure on local populations, and people depend on wild food sources from adjacent mangrove and dry forests. In a study village outside Kirindy Mitea National Park, we surveyed and interviewed 369 individuals (<i>N</i> = 89 households) and conducted 18 focus groups over 6 months (September 2018 to March 2019). We found that individual people tended to exclusively hunt or fish, and hunters pursued relatively few species with more specialized methods than fishers did. By distributing resource utilization across ecosystems, families likely increase household resilience. Therefore, conservation and alternative livelihood efforts will benefit from a regional-scale, multi-ecosystem approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对野生动物不可持续的捕捞和消费破坏了野生动物种群和依赖它们的人类生计的稳定。在沿海景观中,对陆地资源的过度开发会增加对海洋生态系统的压力,反之亦然。我们通过加强海洋生计战略来探索人口减轻狩猎压力的能力,评估马达加斯加人(或集体家庭)是否(1)在渔业产量较低时将捕捞压力和消费从海洋转移到森林;(2)习惯性地开发海洋和陆地资源。我们还评估了渔民和猎人使用的方法和目标物种的多样性,因为对有限资源的依赖提高了对资源获取扰动的敏感性,并迫使人们在经历稀缺时改变生计策略,而不是在生计策略中改变。我们提供了马达加斯加西部每年海洋和陆地野生动物利用的数据,在那里,周期性干旱和饥荒给当地人口带来了压力,人们依赖于邻近红树林和干旱森林的野生食物来源。在Kirindy Mitea国家公园外的一个研究村,我们在6个月内(2018年9月至2019年3月)对369人(N = 89户)进行了调查和访谈,并进行了18个焦点小组。我们发现,个体倾向于专门狩猎或捕鱼,猎人比渔民用更专业的方法追捕相对较少的物种。通过在生态系统中分配资源利用,家庭有可能提高家庭的复原力。因此,保护和替代生计的努力将受益于区域尺度的多生态系统方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Management implications of human livelihood strategies on Madagascar's coastal landscapes

Management implications of human livelihood strategies on Madagascar's coastal landscapes

The unsustainable harvest and consumption of wild animals destabilizes both wildlife populations and the human livelihoods that depend upon them. In coastal landscapes, the overexploitation of terrestrial resources can increase pressures on marine ecosystems, and vice versa. We explore populations' ability to mitigate hunting pressure by bolstering marine livelihood strategies, assessing whether Malagasy people (or aggregated households) (1) transfer harvest pressure and consumption from oceans to forests in times of lower fisheries yields and (2) habitually exploit both marine and terrestrial resources. We also evaluate the diversity of fishers' and hunters' methods used and species targeted, as reliance on a limited range of resources elevates sensitivity to perturbations in resource access and forces people to shift across rather than within livelihood strategies when experiencing scarcity. We present data on annual marine and terrestrial wildlife use in western Madagascar, where cyclic droughts and famines exert pressure on local populations, and people depend on wild food sources from adjacent mangrove and dry forests. In a study village outside Kirindy Mitea National Park, we surveyed and interviewed 369 individuals (N = 89 households) and conducted 18 focus groups over 6 months (September 2018 to March 2019). We found that individual people tended to exclusively hunt or fish, and hunters pursued relatively few species with more specialized methods than fishers did. By distributing resource utilization across ecosystems, families likely increase household resilience. Therefore, conservation and alternative livelihood efforts will benefit from a regional-scale, multi-ecosystem approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信