限额与交易下考虑随机需求和企业决策偏好的绿色技术投资与生产决策

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Chenchong Ding, Shuai Jin
{"title":"限额与交易下考虑随机需求和企业决策偏好的绿色技术投资与生产决策","authors":"Chenchong Ding,&nbsp;Shuai Jin","doi":"10.1002/mde.4449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper investigates how finite rational firms optimally respond to market potential under cap-and-trade regulation, considering stochastic demand. Using the mean–variance model framework, we develop an optimization model for green technology investment and production by finite rational firms with different decision-making preferences. The main results indicate: (1) Under stable demand, firms investing in green technology gain more profits and consumer surplus, however, the effectiveness of carbon emission reduction depends on the market potential size. (2) Under stochastic demand, optimal decisions resulting from firms' varying decision preferences systematically deviate from those of risk-neutral firms and often demonstrate firms' risk-averse tendencies that lean towards conservatism. As external factors change, there can even be a reversal in technology investment with an increase in demand uncertainty that amplifies this systematic deviation. (3) Taking firms with different decision-making preferences as the starting point, this study further analyses the distortion effect of the firm's risk attitude on the optimal technology investment and production decisions, enriching the related research on the joint decision-making risk model of clean production. And it is more pertinent to the complex situation firms face in the real situation with decision-making. (4) This study provides a theoretical basis and practical reference for the finite rational firms facing green technology investment choices. Considering the risk-averse characteristics of firms, this study suggests that the government should establish a risk-sharing mechanism to weaken the deviation of stochastic demand from the optimal decision-making of firms or implement certain subsidy policies to protect the profit level of firms.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"46 3","pages":"1535-1557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green Technology Investment and Production Decisions Considering Stochastic Demand and Firms' Decision Preferences Under Cap-and-Trade Regulation\",\"authors\":\"Chenchong Ding,&nbsp;Shuai Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mde.4449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This paper investigates how finite rational firms optimally respond to market potential under cap-and-trade regulation, considering stochastic demand. Using the mean–variance model framework, we develop an optimization model for green technology investment and production by finite rational firms with different decision-making preferences. The main results indicate: (1) Under stable demand, firms investing in green technology gain more profits and consumer surplus, however, the effectiveness of carbon emission reduction depends on the market potential size. (2) Under stochastic demand, optimal decisions resulting from firms' varying decision preferences systematically deviate from those of risk-neutral firms and often demonstrate firms' risk-averse tendencies that lean towards conservatism. As external factors change, there can even be a reversal in technology investment with an increase in demand uncertainty that amplifies this systematic deviation. (3) Taking firms with different decision-making preferences as the starting point, this study further analyses the distortion effect of the firm's risk attitude on the optimal technology investment and production decisions, enriching the related research on the joint decision-making risk model of clean production. And it is more pertinent to the complex situation firms face in the real situation with decision-making. (4) This study provides a theoretical basis and practical reference for the finite rational firms facing green technology investment choices. Considering the risk-averse characteristics of firms, this study suggests that the government should establish a risk-sharing mechanism to weaken the deviation of stochastic demand from the optimal decision-making of firms or implement certain subsidy policies to protect the profit level of firms.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"volume\":\"46 3\",\"pages\":\"1535-1557\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4449\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了有限理性企业在考虑随机需求的总量管制与交易制度下对市场潜力的最优响应。利用均值-方差模型框架,建立了有限理性企业不同决策偏好下绿色技术投资与生产的优化模型。研究结果表明:(1)在需求稳定的情况下,投资绿色技术的企业获得更多的利润和消费者剩余,但碳减排的效果取决于市场潜力规模。(2)在随机需求下,企业决策偏好的变化导致的最优决策系统地偏离了风险中性企业的最优决策,往往表现出企业倾向于保守主义的风险厌恶倾向。随着外部因素的变化,技术投资甚至可能出现逆转,需求不确定性的增加放大了这种系统性偏差。(3)以不同决策偏好的企业为出发点,进一步分析了企业风险态度对最优技术投资和生产决策的扭曲效应,丰富了清洁生产联合决策风险模型的相关研究。它更符合企业在实际情况下所面临的复杂决策情况。(4)本研究为有限理性企业面临绿色技术投资选择提供了理论依据和实践参考。考虑到企业的风险规避特征,建议政府建立风险分担机制以减弱随机需求对企业最优决策的偏离,或者实施一定的补贴政策以保护企业的利润水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Green Technology Investment and Production Decisions Considering Stochastic Demand and Firms' Decision Preferences Under Cap-and-Trade Regulation

This paper investigates how finite rational firms optimally respond to market potential under cap-and-trade regulation, considering stochastic demand. Using the mean–variance model framework, we develop an optimization model for green technology investment and production by finite rational firms with different decision-making preferences. The main results indicate: (1) Under stable demand, firms investing in green technology gain more profits and consumer surplus, however, the effectiveness of carbon emission reduction depends on the market potential size. (2) Under stochastic demand, optimal decisions resulting from firms' varying decision preferences systematically deviate from those of risk-neutral firms and often demonstrate firms' risk-averse tendencies that lean towards conservatism. As external factors change, there can even be a reversal in technology investment with an increase in demand uncertainty that amplifies this systematic deviation. (3) Taking firms with different decision-making preferences as the starting point, this study further analyses the distortion effect of the firm's risk attitude on the optimal technology investment and production decisions, enriching the related research on the joint decision-making risk model of clean production. And it is more pertinent to the complex situation firms face in the real situation with decision-making. (4) This study provides a theoretical basis and practical reference for the finite rational firms facing green technology investment choices. Considering the risk-averse characteristics of firms, this study suggests that the government should establish a risk-sharing mechanism to weaken the deviation of stochastic demand from the optimal decision-making of firms or implement certain subsidy policies to protect the profit level of firms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信