在新冠肺炎大流行的第三年,担心去口腔修复诊所或将新冠病毒传染给亲属会导致焦虑/抑郁,在治疗过程中不能戴口罩也会导致焦虑

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hatice Lamia Elif Sagesen, Sezgi Cinel Sahin, Cagri Koyal
{"title":"在新冠肺炎大流行的第三年,担心去口腔修复诊所或将新冠病毒传染给亲属会导致焦虑/抑郁,在治疗过程中不能戴口罩也会导致焦虑","authors":"Hatice Lamia Elif Sagesen,&nbsp;Sezgi Cinel Sahin,&nbsp;Cagri Koyal","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/8888157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the anxiety and depression levels and the factors affecting them in the patients who applied to the Prosthodontics Clinic during the end of the pandemic process with the ‘Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)’.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> To determine the symptoms of anxiety and depression, probable cause questions and the “Turkish version of the HADS” were applied to the volunteers who applied to the Prosthodontics Clinic. In the study, independent groups t- and one-way ANOVA tests were used to compare the data according to the groups, the Chi-square test was used for the relationships between group variables, and logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors affecting anxiety and depression.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> A total of 194 volunteers (96 male, 98 female) were included in the study. Of the participants, anxiety was detected in 42.3%, depression was detected in 58.8%, and the HADS average was measured as 15.97 ± 7.66. In the depression score classification, the difference between the depression scores of nonsmoking participants (7.8 ± 4.03) and smokers (9.07 ± 3.36) was found to be statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.036). Applying to the prosthodontics clinic during the period when pandemic measures were reduced (OR = 2.158) and the possibility of transmitting COVID-19 to relatives (OR = 1.816), and removing the mask during examination and treatment (OR = 2.245) were factors that increased the risk of anxiety. Applying to the prosthodontics clinic (OR = 2.757), the possibility of transmitting COVID-19 to relatives (OR = 1.653) were factors that increased the risk of depression in participants.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> In the third year of the pandemic, we can assume that patients who have not had COVID-19 and were smokers who applied to the prosthodontics clinic are more prone to depression. Also, it can be said that application to the prosthodontics clinic during this period and the worrying about transmitting COVID-19 to relatives are both anxiety and depression-increasing factors. Removing the mask during examination and treatment is an anxiety-increasing factor.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/8888157","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the Third Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic, the Worry of Applying to the Prosthodontics Clinic or Transmitting COVID-19 to Relatives Can Cause Anxiety/Depression and Not Being Able to Wear a Mask During Treatment Can Also Cause Anxiety\",\"authors\":\"Hatice Lamia Elif Sagesen,&nbsp;Sezgi Cinel Sahin,&nbsp;Cagri Koyal\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ijcp/8888157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the anxiety and depression levels and the factors affecting them in the patients who applied to the Prosthodontics Clinic during the end of the pandemic process with the ‘Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)’.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> To determine the symptoms of anxiety and depression, probable cause questions and the “Turkish version of the HADS” were applied to the volunteers who applied to the Prosthodontics Clinic. In the study, independent groups t- and one-way ANOVA tests were used to compare the data according to the groups, the Chi-square test was used for the relationships between group variables, and logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors affecting anxiety and depression.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> A total of 194 volunteers (96 male, 98 female) were included in the study. Of the participants, anxiety was detected in 42.3%, depression was detected in 58.8%, and the HADS average was measured as 15.97 ± 7.66. In the depression score classification, the difference between the depression scores of nonsmoking participants (7.8 ± 4.03) and smokers (9.07 ± 3.36) was found to be statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.036). Applying to the prosthodontics clinic during the period when pandemic measures were reduced (OR = 2.158) and the possibility of transmitting COVID-19 to relatives (OR = 1.816), and removing the mask during examination and treatment (OR = 2.245) were factors that increased the risk of anxiety. Applying to the prosthodontics clinic (OR = 2.757), the possibility of transmitting COVID-19 to relatives (OR = 1.653) were factors that increased the risk of depression in participants.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> In the third year of the pandemic, we can assume that patients who have not had COVID-19 and were smokers who applied to the prosthodontics clinic are more prone to depression. Also, it can be said that application to the prosthodontics clinic during this period and the worrying about transmitting COVID-19 to relatives are both anxiety and depression-increasing factors. Removing the mask during examination and treatment is an anxiety-increasing factor.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/8888157\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/8888157\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/8888157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:应用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评价大流行末期就诊口腔修复科患者的焦虑抑郁水平及其影响因素。方法:采用可能原因问题和“土耳其版HADS”对申请口腔修复临床的志愿者进行焦虑和抑郁症状的确定。本研究采用独立组t-检验和单因素方差分析对分组数据进行比较,组变量间关系采用卡方检验,影响焦虑、抑郁的因素采用logistic回归分析。结果:共纳入194名志愿者,其中男性96名,女性98名。在参与者中,焦虑占42.3%,抑郁占58.8%,HADS平均值为15.97±7.66。在抑郁评分分类中,不吸烟组(7.8±4.03)与吸烟组(9.07±3.36)的差异有统计学意义(p = 0.036)。在疫情防控措施减少期间就诊(OR = 2.158)、将新冠病毒传播给亲属的可能性(OR = 1.816)、检查和治疗期间摘下口罩(OR = 2.245)是增加焦虑风险的因素。应用于口腔修复临床(OR = 2.757),将COVID-19传播给亲属的可能性(OR = 1.653)是增加参与者抑郁风险的因素。结论:在大流行的第三年,我们可以假设未感染COVID-19且吸烟的患者在申请修复临床时更容易出现抑郁。同时,这一时期的口腔修复就诊申请以及担心将新冠病毒传播给亲属也是增加焦虑和抑郁的因素。在检查和治疗期间摘下口罩是一个增加焦虑的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

In the Third Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic, the Worry of Applying to the Prosthodontics Clinic or Transmitting COVID-19 to Relatives Can Cause Anxiety/Depression and Not Being Able to Wear a Mask During Treatment Can Also Cause Anxiety

In the Third Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic, the Worry of Applying to the Prosthodontics Clinic or Transmitting COVID-19 to Relatives Can Cause Anxiety/Depression and Not Being Able to Wear a Mask During Treatment Can Also Cause Anxiety

Objective: To evaluate the anxiety and depression levels and the factors affecting them in the patients who applied to the Prosthodontics Clinic during the end of the pandemic process with the ‘Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)’.

Methods: To determine the symptoms of anxiety and depression, probable cause questions and the “Turkish version of the HADS” were applied to the volunteers who applied to the Prosthodontics Clinic. In the study, independent groups t- and one-way ANOVA tests were used to compare the data according to the groups, the Chi-square test was used for the relationships between group variables, and logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors affecting anxiety and depression.

Results: A total of 194 volunteers (96 male, 98 female) were included in the study. Of the participants, anxiety was detected in 42.3%, depression was detected in 58.8%, and the HADS average was measured as 15.97 ± 7.66. In the depression score classification, the difference between the depression scores of nonsmoking participants (7.8 ± 4.03) and smokers (9.07 ± 3.36) was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.036). Applying to the prosthodontics clinic during the period when pandemic measures were reduced (OR = 2.158) and the possibility of transmitting COVID-19 to relatives (OR = 1.816), and removing the mask during examination and treatment (OR = 2.245) were factors that increased the risk of anxiety. Applying to the prosthodontics clinic (OR = 2.757), the possibility of transmitting COVID-19 to relatives (OR = 1.653) were factors that increased the risk of depression in participants.

Conclusion: In the third year of the pandemic, we can assume that patients who have not had COVID-19 and were smokers who applied to the prosthodontics clinic are more prone to depression. Also, it can be said that application to the prosthodontics clinic during this period and the worrying about transmitting COVID-19 to relatives are both anxiety and depression-increasing factors. Removing the mask during examination and treatment is an anxiety-increasing factor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信