对防晒霜使用调查数据进行统计分析,以确定影响水生系统中紫外线过滤器暴露的因素

Q2 Environmental Science
Andrea M. Carrao , Sarah L. Terrell , Celine N. Schmitt , Scott D. Dyer
{"title":"对防晒霜使用调查数据进行统计分析,以确定影响水生系统中紫外线过滤器暴露的因素","authors":"Andrea M. Carrao ,&nbsp;Sarah L. Terrell ,&nbsp;Celine N. Schmitt ,&nbsp;Scott D. Dyer","doi":"10.1016/j.envc.2025.101112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Current environmental emissions assessments for UV filters in sunscreens used at the beach assume a uniform application rate. While this approach is both conservative and pragmatic, it fails to take into account consumer behaviors that could lead to a range of application values. This study explored diverse behavior, environmental, and other independent factors that may affect application rates by investigating results from an online survey with &gt;2,000 participants. The survey included visual references that helped participants determine the mass of sunscreen lotion applied to their face and body. The resulting datasets for the face and body required curation to eliminate conflicting responses (e.g., “I don't typically apply sunscreen” and contradictory sunscreen application amount responses). Environmental variables tied to the zip codes of participants were investigated for their links with application rates. Generalized linear models (GLM) were used to assess the multivariate nature of participant attributes (e.g., income, skin tone), environmental factors (e.g., UV radiation by zip code) and others to self-report application rates. Akaike's Information Criterion was used to select highly significant models. An eight-variable model explained application thickness on the body, in order of statistical significance: amount of body submerged in water, time in water, gender identity, age, Fitzpatrick skin type, body reapplication, skin response to the sun, and time at the beach. The statistical analysis demonstrated that a clear, one-size-approach toward exposure assessment of UV filters in sunscreens at the beach may not be appropriate because several independent variables were significantly related to application rates to the face and body. The learnings from this study can be used to refine future online surveys. This can lead to realistic environmental emissions and exposure assessments that include diverse independent factors associated with sunscreen use at the beach as well as the ability to tailor emissions estimates to specific beach and aquatic environments thus providing the ability to better target environmental risk management actions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34794,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Challenges","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 101112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical analyses of sunscreen usage survey data for the purpose of factor refinement influencing UV filter exposure in aquatic systems\",\"authors\":\"Andrea M. Carrao ,&nbsp;Sarah L. Terrell ,&nbsp;Celine N. Schmitt ,&nbsp;Scott D. Dyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envc.2025.101112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Current environmental emissions assessments for UV filters in sunscreens used at the beach assume a uniform application rate. While this approach is both conservative and pragmatic, it fails to take into account consumer behaviors that could lead to a range of application values. This study explored diverse behavior, environmental, and other independent factors that may affect application rates by investigating results from an online survey with &gt;2,000 participants. The survey included visual references that helped participants determine the mass of sunscreen lotion applied to their face and body. The resulting datasets for the face and body required curation to eliminate conflicting responses (e.g., “I don't typically apply sunscreen” and contradictory sunscreen application amount responses). Environmental variables tied to the zip codes of participants were investigated for their links with application rates. Generalized linear models (GLM) were used to assess the multivariate nature of participant attributes (e.g., income, skin tone), environmental factors (e.g., UV radiation by zip code) and others to self-report application rates. Akaike's Information Criterion was used to select highly significant models. An eight-variable model explained application thickness on the body, in order of statistical significance: amount of body submerged in water, time in water, gender identity, age, Fitzpatrick skin type, body reapplication, skin response to the sun, and time at the beach. The statistical analysis demonstrated that a clear, one-size-approach toward exposure assessment of UV filters in sunscreens at the beach may not be appropriate because several independent variables were significantly related to application rates to the face and body. The learnings from this study can be used to refine future online surveys. This can lead to realistic environmental emissions and exposure assessments that include diverse independent factors associated with sunscreen use at the beach as well as the ability to tailor emissions estimates to specific beach and aquatic environments thus providing the ability to better target environmental risk management actions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Challenges\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Challenges\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010025000320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010025000320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前对海滩上使用的防晒霜中紫外线过滤器的环境排放评估假设使用统一的涂抹率。虽然这种方法既保守又实用,但它没有考虑到可能导致一系列应用程序价值的消费者行为。本研究通过调查2000名参与者的在线调查结果,探讨了可能影响申请率的各种行为、环境和其他独立因素。该调查包括视觉参考,帮助参与者确定涂抹在面部和身体上的防晒霜的量。面部和身体的结果数据集需要进行管理,以消除相互矛盾的反应(例如,“我通常不涂防晒霜”和防晒霜涂抹量矛盾的反应)。研究人员调查了与参与者的邮政编码相关的环境变量与申请率的关系。使用广义线性模型(GLM)来评估参与者属性(如收入、肤色)、环境因素(如邮政编码的紫外线辐射)和其他自我报告应用率的多变量性质。采用赤池信息准则选择高度显著模型。一个八变量模型解释了涂抹在身体上的厚度,按照有统计学意义的顺序依次是:身体浸泡在水中的量、在水中的时间、性别认同、年龄、菲茨帕特里克皮肤类型、身体再次涂抹、皮肤对阳光的反应和在海滩上的时间。统计分析表明,对海滩上的防晒霜中紫外线过滤器的暴露评估采用一种清晰、单一的方法可能并不合适,因为有几个独立的变量与面部和身体的涂抹率显著相关。从这项研究中学到的知识可以用来完善未来的在线调查。这可以导致现实的环境排放和暴露评估,包括与海滩上使用防晒霜相关的各种独立因素,以及根据特定海滩和水生环境量身定制排放估算的能力,从而提供更好地针对环境风险管理行动的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Statistical analyses of sunscreen usage survey data for the purpose of factor refinement influencing UV filter exposure in aquatic systems

Statistical analyses of sunscreen usage survey data for the purpose of factor refinement influencing UV filter exposure in aquatic systems
Current environmental emissions assessments for UV filters in sunscreens used at the beach assume a uniform application rate. While this approach is both conservative and pragmatic, it fails to take into account consumer behaviors that could lead to a range of application values. This study explored diverse behavior, environmental, and other independent factors that may affect application rates by investigating results from an online survey with >2,000 participants. The survey included visual references that helped participants determine the mass of sunscreen lotion applied to their face and body. The resulting datasets for the face and body required curation to eliminate conflicting responses (e.g., “I don't typically apply sunscreen” and contradictory sunscreen application amount responses). Environmental variables tied to the zip codes of participants were investigated for their links with application rates. Generalized linear models (GLM) were used to assess the multivariate nature of participant attributes (e.g., income, skin tone), environmental factors (e.g., UV radiation by zip code) and others to self-report application rates. Akaike's Information Criterion was used to select highly significant models. An eight-variable model explained application thickness on the body, in order of statistical significance: amount of body submerged in water, time in water, gender identity, age, Fitzpatrick skin type, body reapplication, skin response to the sun, and time at the beach. The statistical analysis demonstrated that a clear, one-size-approach toward exposure assessment of UV filters in sunscreens at the beach may not be appropriate because several independent variables were significantly related to application rates to the face and body. The learnings from this study can be used to refine future online surveys. This can lead to realistic environmental emissions and exposure assessments that include diverse independent factors associated with sunscreen use at the beach as well as the ability to tailor emissions estimates to specific beach and aquatic environments thus providing the ability to better target environmental risk management actions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Challenges
Environmental Challenges Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
249
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信