表征亚急性脊髓损伤期间的担忧和压力源:心理治疗会议记录的专题分析

IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION
Elizabeth C. Pasipanodya PhD , Ramya Gopalan MS , Phuoc Thien Truong BS , Cria-May Khong BS , Benjamin Dirlikov MA , Mark Held PhD , Janelle Myhre PhD , Kazuko Shem MD
{"title":"表征亚急性脊髓损伤期间的担忧和压力源:心理治疗会议记录的专题分析","authors":"Elizabeth C. Pasipanodya PhD ,&nbsp;Ramya Gopalan MS ,&nbsp;Phuoc Thien Truong BS ,&nbsp;Cria-May Khong BS ,&nbsp;Benjamin Dirlikov MA ,&nbsp;Mark Held PhD ,&nbsp;Janelle Myhre PhD ,&nbsp;Kazuko Shem MD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe and enumerate the prevalence of concerns and stressors experienced by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) during subacute injury.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A within-arm (intervention only) qualitative analysis of psychotherapy notes obtained during the 12-week active phase of a randomized controlled trial of tele-cognitive behavioral therapy (tele-CBT). Therapy sessions were conducted between January 2019 and February 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Community setting.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Twenty-two individuals (men: n=14; women: n=8) were included in the analyses; the average age was 44.8 years (SD=18.1) and the mean injury duration was 103.14 days (SD=78.3).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Participants engaged in 10 (45-60min) CBT sessions with a licensed psychologist; CBT sessions were administered via Apple FaceTime weekly for 8 weeks and then biweekly for 4 weeks, for a total of 10 sessions over 12 weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The analyses presented here differ from the main planned analyses to gauge the efficacy of intervention in the study. Psychotherapy notes were qualitatively coded to identify participant endorsements of negative life events, general and SCI-related complaints, and stressors; these inventoried concerns were hierarchically organized into larger subthemes and themes, following Bronfenbrenner's and McLeroy's socioecological framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thematically, concerns articulated by individuals with SCI were intrapersonal (cognitive/emotional, somatic, and behavioral), interpersonal (relationships with significant others, with friends and family, with paid caregivers, and with medical providers as well as pet-related concerns), and environmental (access to health care and insurance, accessibility of public spaces, supportive housing, and stigma and discrimination). Compared with research that has enumerated domains of importance among individuals living with SCI, concerns around loss of independence and care burden were more frequently endorsed while bladder/bowel dysfunction and sexual/reproductive concerns were articulated only by a minority of participants. Indeed, across all participants, the most frequently endorsed concerns included pain (n=16; 72.7%), loss of independence (n=12; 54.6%), poor sleep (n=11; 50.0%), and self-perceived care burden (n=11; 50.0%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Individuals with SCI experience a broad range of concerns across multiple ecological levels, some of which are anticipatory (eg, worry about fulfilling duties, once returned to work) and are not SCI-specific (eg, improving health behaviors, managing grief after bereavement). Multimodal and multidisciplinary approaches are needed to provide effective interventions to improve the quality of life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100410"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing Concerns and Stressors During Subacute Spinal Cord Injury: A Thematic Analysis of Psychotherapy Session Notes\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth C. Pasipanodya PhD ,&nbsp;Ramya Gopalan MS ,&nbsp;Phuoc Thien Truong BS ,&nbsp;Cria-May Khong BS ,&nbsp;Benjamin Dirlikov MA ,&nbsp;Mark Held PhD ,&nbsp;Janelle Myhre PhD ,&nbsp;Kazuko Shem MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe and enumerate the prevalence of concerns and stressors experienced by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) during subacute injury.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A within-arm (intervention only) qualitative analysis of psychotherapy notes obtained during the 12-week active phase of a randomized controlled trial of tele-cognitive behavioral therapy (tele-CBT). Therapy sessions were conducted between January 2019 and February 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Community setting.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Twenty-two individuals (men: n=14; women: n=8) were included in the analyses; the average age was 44.8 years (SD=18.1) and the mean injury duration was 103.14 days (SD=78.3).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Participants engaged in 10 (45-60min) CBT sessions with a licensed psychologist; CBT sessions were administered via Apple FaceTime weekly for 8 weeks and then biweekly for 4 weeks, for a total of 10 sessions over 12 weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The analyses presented here differ from the main planned analyses to gauge the efficacy of intervention in the study. Psychotherapy notes were qualitatively coded to identify participant endorsements of negative life events, general and SCI-related complaints, and stressors; these inventoried concerns were hierarchically organized into larger subthemes and themes, following Bronfenbrenner's and McLeroy's socioecological framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thematically, concerns articulated by individuals with SCI were intrapersonal (cognitive/emotional, somatic, and behavioral), interpersonal (relationships with significant others, with friends and family, with paid caregivers, and with medical providers as well as pet-related concerns), and environmental (access to health care and insurance, accessibility of public spaces, supportive housing, and stigma and discrimination). Compared with research that has enumerated domains of importance among individuals living with SCI, concerns around loss of independence and care burden were more frequently endorsed while bladder/bowel dysfunction and sexual/reproductive concerns were articulated only by a minority of participants. Indeed, across all participants, the most frequently endorsed concerns included pain (n=16; 72.7%), loss of independence (n=12; 54.6%), poor sleep (n=11; 50.0%), and self-perceived care burden (n=11; 50.0%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Individuals with SCI experience a broad range of concerns across multiple ecological levels, some of which are anticipatory (eg, worry about fulfilling duties, once returned to work) and are not SCI-specific (eg, improving health behaviors, managing grief after bereavement). Multimodal and multidisciplinary approaches are needed to provide effective interventions to improve the quality of life.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259010952400123X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259010952400123X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的描述和列举脊髓损伤(SCI)患者在亚急性损伤期间所经历的焦虑和应激源的患病率。设计一项针对远程认知行为治疗(远程cbt)随机对照试验12周活跃期心理治疗记录的组内(仅干预)定性分析。治疗课程在2019年1月至2023年2月期间进行。SettingCommunity设置。参与者:22人(男性:n=14;女性:n=8)被纳入分析;平均年龄44.8岁(SD=18.1),平均损伤时间103.14 d (SD=78.3)。干预:参与者与持牌心理学家进行10次(45-60分钟)CBT会话;CBT课程通过苹果FaceTime每周进行8周,然后每两周进行4周,在12周内总共进行10次。主要结果测量本研究提出的分析不同于评估研究中干预效果的主要计划分析。对心理治疗记录进行定性编码,以确定参与者对消极生活事件、一般和自我认知障碍相关的抱怨以及压力源的认可;按照Bronfenbrenner和McLeroy的社会生态框架,这些被列出的关注点按层次组织成更大的子主题和主题。结果从主题上看,脊髓损伤患者所表达的担忧主要是个人的(认知/情感、身体和行为)、人际关系(与重要他人、与朋友和家人、与付费照顾者、与医疗服务提供者以及与宠物相关的担忧)和环境(获得医疗保健和保险、公共空间的可及性、支持性住房、污名和歧视)。与列举脊髓损伤患者重要领域的研究相比,对独立性丧失和护理负担的担忧更频繁得到认可,而膀胱/肠道功能障碍和性/生殖问题只有少数参与者明确表达。事实上,在所有参与者中,最常见的担忧包括疼痛(n=16;72.7%),丧失独立性(n=12;54.6%),睡眠差(n=11;50.0%)、自我感知护理负担(n=11;50.0%)。结论脊髓损伤患者在多个生态层面上经历了广泛的关注,其中一些是预期的(例如,担心履行职责,一旦返回工作岗位),而不是脊髓损伤特异性的(例如,改善健康行为,处理丧亲后的悲伤)。需要多模式和多学科的方法来提供有效的干预措施,以改善生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterizing Concerns and Stressors During Subacute Spinal Cord Injury: A Thematic Analysis of Psychotherapy Session Notes

Objective

To describe and enumerate the prevalence of concerns and stressors experienced by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) during subacute injury.

Design

A within-arm (intervention only) qualitative analysis of psychotherapy notes obtained during the 12-week active phase of a randomized controlled trial of tele-cognitive behavioral therapy (tele-CBT). Therapy sessions were conducted between January 2019 and February 2023.

Setting

Community setting.

Participants

Twenty-two individuals (men: n=14; women: n=8) were included in the analyses; the average age was 44.8 years (SD=18.1) and the mean injury duration was 103.14 days (SD=78.3).

Interventions

Participants engaged in 10 (45-60min) CBT sessions with a licensed psychologist; CBT sessions were administered via Apple FaceTime weekly for 8 weeks and then biweekly for 4 weeks, for a total of 10 sessions over 12 weeks.

Main Outcome Measures

The analyses presented here differ from the main planned analyses to gauge the efficacy of intervention in the study. Psychotherapy notes were qualitatively coded to identify participant endorsements of negative life events, general and SCI-related complaints, and stressors; these inventoried concerns were hierarchically organized into larger subthemes and themes, following Bronfenbrenner's and McLeroy's socioecological framework.

Results

Thematically, concerns articulated by individuals with SCI were intrapersonal (cognitive/emotional, somatic, and behavioral), interpersonal (relationships with significant others, with friends and family, with paid caregivers, and with medical providers as well as pet-related concerns), and environmental (access to health care and insurance, accessibility of public spaces, supportive housing, and stigma and discrimination). Compared with research that has enumerated domains of importance among individuals living with SCI, concerns around loss of independence and care burden were more frequently endorsed while bladder/bowel dysfunction and sexual/reproductive concerns were articulated only by a minority of participants. Indeed, across all participants, the most frequently endorsed concerns included pain (n=16; 72.7%), loss of independence (n=12; 54.6%), poor sleep (n=11; 50.0%), and self-perceived care burden (n=11; 50.0%).

Conclusions

Individuals with SCI experience a broad range of concerns across multiple ecological levels, some of which are anticipatory (eg, worry about fulfilling duties, once returned to work) and are not SCI-specific (eg, improving health behaviors, managing grief after bereavement). Multimodal and multidisciplinary approaches are needed to provide effective interventions to improve the quality of life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信