感觉运动稳定训练配合或不配合行为治疗腰痛:一项多中心随机对照试验的可行性和效果

IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION
Tilman Engel PhD , Daniel Niederer PhD , Adamantios Arampatzis PhD , Winfried Banzer MD , Heidrun Beck MD , Philipp Floessel MA , Thore Haag PhD , Steffen Mueller PhD , Marcus Schiltenwolf MD , Hendrik Schmidt PhD , Christian Schneider MD , Dirk Stengel MD , Josefine Stoll PhD , Pia-Maria Wippert PhD , Frank Mayer MD
{"title":"感觉运动稳定训练配合或不配合行为治疗腰痛:一项多中心随机对照试验的可行性和效果","authors":"Tilman Engel PhD ,&nbsp;Daniel Niederer PhD ,&nbsp;Adamantios Arampatzis PhD ,&nbsp;Winfried Banzer MD ,&nbsp;Heidrun Beck MD ,&nbsp;Philipp Floessel MA ,&nbsp;Thore Haag PhD ,&nbsp;Steffen Mueller PhD ,&nbsp;Marcus Schiltenwolf MD ,&nbsp;Hendrik Schmidt PhD ,&nbsp;Christian Schneider MD ,&nbsp;Dirk Stengel MD ,&nbsp;Josefine Stoll PhD ,&nbsp;Pia-Maria Wippert PhD ,&nbsp;Frank Mayer MD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate the feasibility and effects of a sensorimotor stabilization exercise intervention with and without behavioral treatment in nonspecific low back pain.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A three-armed multicenter randomized controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Five study sites across Germany (3 orthopedic university outpatient clinics, 1 university sports medicine department, and 1 clinical institution).</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Six hundred and sixty-two volunteers (N=662) (59% females, age 39±13y) with low back pain.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Sensorimotor training (SMT), sensorimotor training with behavioral therapy (SMT+BT), and usual care group (UCG; continuation of the already ongoing individual treatment regime). Intervention groups performed a 12-week (3wk center-based, 9wk home-based) program.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Adherence, dropout rates, adverse events, and intervention effects on pain intensity, disability, and trunk torque (gain scores, repeated measures analysis of variance, α-level&lt;0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 220 participants received SMT, 222 received SMT+BT, and 170 were analyzed as UCG. Dropout rates were 10% for SMT and SMT+BT at week 3, 31% and 30% at week 4, and 49% and 50% at week 12. Adherence rates above 80% were reached in both interventions; 134 adverse events occurred. Intervention effects compared to UCG were found for pain intensity (SMT, <em>P</em>=.011, effect size d=0.41), disability (SMT+BT, <em>P</em>=.020, d=0.41), and peak torque (SMT, <em>P</em>=.045, d=0.38; SMT+BT, <em>P</em>=.019, d=0.44), with overall small effect sizes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Participants were highly adherent to the sensorimotor exercise, but showed increased dropout rates, particularly during home-based training. Both interventions proved to be feasible, and although only SMT showed an increased effect on pain intensity compared to UCG, the SMT+BT showed positive effects on disability. Both interventions led to increases in strength, indicative of a neuromuscular adaptation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100430"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensorimotor Stabilization Exercises With and Without Behavioral Treatment in Low Back Pain: Feasibility and Effects of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Tilman Engel PhD ,&nbsp;Daniel Niederer PhD ,&nbsp;Adamantios Arampatzis PhD ,&nbsp;Winfried Banzer MD ,&nbsp;Heidrun Beck MD ,&nbsp;Philipp Floessel MA ,&nbsp;Thore Haag PhD ,&nbsp;Steffen Mueller PhD ,&nbsp;Marcus Schiltenwolf MD ,&nbsp;Hendrik Schmidt PhD ,&nbsp;Christian Schneider MD ,&nbsp;Dirk Stengel MD ,&nbsp;Josefine Stoll PhD ,&nbsp;Pia-Maria Wippert PhD ,&nbsp;Frank Mayer MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate the feasibility and effects of a sensorimotor stabilization exercise intervention with and without behavioral treatment in nonspecific low back pain.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A three-armed multicenter randomized controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Five study sites across Germany (3 orthopedic university outpatient clinics, 1 university sports medicine department, and 1 clinical institution).</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Six hundred and sixty-two volunteers (N=662) (59% females, age 39±13y) with low back pain.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Sensorimotor training (SMT), sensorimotor training with behavioral therapy (SMT+BT), and usual care group (UCG; continuation of the already ongoing individual treatment regime). Intervention groups performed a 12-week (3wk center-based, 9wk home-based) program.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Adherence, dropout rates, adverse events, and intervention effects on pain intensity, disability, and trunk torque (gain scores, repeated measures analysis of variance, α-level&lt;0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 220 participants received SMT, 222 received SMT+BT, and 170 were analyzed as UCG. Dropout rates were 10% for SMT and SMT+BT at week 3, 31% and 30% at week 4, and 49% and 50% at week 12. Adherence rates above 80% were reached in both interventions; 134 adverse events occurred. Intervention effects compared to UCG were found for pain intensity (SMT, <em>P</em>=.011, effect size d=0.41), disability (SMT+BT, <em>P</em>=.020, d=0.41), and peak torque (SMT, <em>P</em>=.045, d=0.38; SMT+BT, <em>P</em>=.019, d=0.44), with overall small effect sizes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Participants were highly adherent to the sensorimotor exercise, but showed increased dropout rates, particularly during home-based training. Both interventions proved to be feasible, and although only SMT showed an increased effect on pain intensity compared to UCG, the SMT+BT showed positive effects on disability. Both interventions led to increases in strength, indicative of a neuromuscular adaptation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109525000059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109525000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨感觉运动稳定运动干预配合或不配合行为治疗治疗非特异性腰痛的可行性和效果。设计一项三臂多中心随机对照试验。德国5个研究点(3个骨科大学门诊,1个大学运动医学部,1个临床机构)。662名患有腰痛的志愿者(N=662)(59%为女性,年龄39±13y)。干预:感觉运动训练(SMT),感觉运动训练与行为治疗(SMT+BT),常规护理组(UCG;继续目前正在进行的个别治疗方案)。干预组进行为期12周(3周以中心为基础,9周以家庭为基础)的计划。主要观察指标:依从性、辍学率、不良事件和干预对疼痛强度、残疾和躯干扭矩的影响(增益评分,重复测量方差分析,α-level<0.05)。结果共220名受试者接受SMT治疗,222名受试者接受SMT+BT治疗,170名受试者接受UCG分析。第3周,SMT和SMT+BT的退出率分别为10%,第4周为31%和30%,第12周为49%和50%。两种干预措施的依从率均达到80%以上;发生134例不良事件。与UCG相比,干预对疼痛强度的影响(SMT, P=。011,效应量d=0.41),残疾(SMT+BT, P=。020, d=0.41),峰值扭矩(SMT, P= 0.41)。045年,d = 0.38;SMT + BT, P =。019, d=0.44),总体效应较小。结论:参与者高度坚持感觉运动训练,但退出率增加,特别是在家庭训练期间。两种干预措施都被证明是可行的,尽管与UCG相比,只有SMT对疼痛强度的影响增加,但SMT+BT对残疾有积极影响。两种干预措施都导致力量增加,表明神经肌肉适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensorimotor Stabilization Exercises With and Without Behavioral Treatment in Low Back Pain: Feasibility and Effects of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives

To investigate the feasibility and effects of a sensorimotor stabilization exercise intervention with and without behavioral treatment in nonspecific low back pain.

Design

A three-armed multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Five study sites across Germany (3 orthopedic university outpatient clinics, 1 university sports medicine department, and 1 clinical institution).

Participants

Six hundred and sixty-two volunteers (N=662) (59% females, age 39±13y) with low back pain.

Interventions

Sensorimotor training (SMT), sensorimotor training with behavioral therapy (SMT+BT), and usual care group (UCG; continuation of the already ongoing individual treatment regime). Intervention groups performed a 12-week (3wk center-based, 9wk home-based) program.

Main Outcome Measures

Adherence, dropout rates, adverse events, and intervention effects on pain intensity, disability, and trunk torque (gain scores, repeated measures analysis of variance, α-level<0.05).

Results

In total, 220 participants received SMT, 222 received SMT+BT, and 170 were analyzed as UCG. Dropout rates were 10% for SMT and SMT+BT at week 3, 31% and 30% at week 4, and 49% and 50% at week 12. Adherence rates above 80% were reached in both interventions; 134 adverse events occurred. Intervention effects compared to UCG were found for pain intensity (SMT, P=.011, effect size d=0.41), disability (SMT+BT, P=.020, d=0.41), and peak torque (SMT, P=.045, d=0.38; SMT+BT, P=.019, d=0.44), with overall small effect sizes.

Conclusions

Participants were highly adherent to the sensorimotor exercise, but showed increased dropout rates, particularly during home-based training. Both interventions proved to be feasible, and although only SMT showed an increased effect on pain intensity compared to UCG, the SMT+BT showed positive effects on disability. Both interventions led to increases in strength, indicative of a neuromuscular adaptation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信