技术在康复环境中的应用:治疗观察、混合方法分析和数据可视化

IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION
Courtney Celian M/OT , Hannah Redd PT, DPT , Kevin Smaller BS , Partha Ryali PhD , James L. Patton PhD , David J. Reinkensmeyer PhD , Miriam R. Rafferty PT, DPT, PhD
{"title":"技术在康复环境中的应用:治疗观察、混合方法分析和数据可视化","authors":"Courtney Celian M/OT ,&nbsp;Hannah Redd PT, DPT ,&nbsp;Kevin Smaller BS ,&nbsp;Partha Ryali PhD ,&nbsp;James L. Patton PhD ,&nbsp;David J. Reinkensmeyer PhD ,&nbsp;Miriam R. Rafferty PT, DPT, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze real-world rehabilitation technology (RT) use, with a view toward enhancing RT development and adoption.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A convergent, mixed-methods study using therapy observations, semistructured templates, and summative content analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Ten neurorehabilitation units in a single health system.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Three research clinicians (1 occupational therapist [OT], 2 physical therapists [PTs]) observed approximately 78 OTs and 100 PTs (N=178).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Characteristics of RT, time spent setting up and using RT, and clinician behaviors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety distinct devices across 15 different focus areas were inventoried. Three hundred twenty-nine RT uses were documented over 44 hours, with only 42% of inventoried devices observed used. RT was used more during interventions (72%) than measurement (28%). Intervention devices used frequently were associated with balance/gait (39%), strength/endurance (30%), and transfer/mobility training (16%). Measurement devices were frequently used to measure vital signs (83%), followed by grip strength (7%), and upper extremity function (5%). Device characteristics were predominately electrically powered (56%), actuated (57%), monitor-less (53%), multiuse (68%), and required little familiarization (57%). Setup times were brief (mean ± SD = 3.8±4.2 and 0.8±1.3min for intervention and measurement, respectively); more time was spent with intervention RT (25.6±15min) than measurement RT (7.3±11.2min). RT nearly always involved verbal instructions (72%) with clinicians providing more feedback on performance (59.7%) than on results (30%) to their patients. Clinicians were evenly divided between providing one-on-one direct attention (49.7%) and multitasking (50.3%), such as completing documentation, when using RT with patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Even in a tech-friendly hospital, most available RTs were observed unused, especially measurement technologies. We discuss how the identified characteristics of used RT, as well as the observations about how therapists used RT, may be useful in guiding new designs. An interactive data visualization page supplement is also provided to facilitate further exploration with this dataset.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Technology in the Rehabilitation Setting: Therapy Observations, Mixed Methods Analysis, and Data Visualization\",\"authors\":\"Courtney Celian M/OT ,&nbsp;Hannah Redd PT, DPT ,&nbsp;Kevin Smaller BS ,&nbsp;Partha Ryali PhD ,&nbsp;James L. Patton PhD ,&nbsp;David J. Reinkensmeyer PhD ,&nbsp;Miriam R. Rafferty PT, DPT, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze real-world rehabilitation technology (RT) use, with a view toward enhancing RT development and adoption.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A convergent, mixed-methods study using therapy observations, semistructured templates, and summative content analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Ten neurorehabilitation units in a single health system.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Three research clinicians (1 occupational therapist [OT], 2 physical therapists [PTs]) observed approximately 78 OTs and 100 PTs (N=178).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Characteristics of RT, time spent setting up and using RT, and clinician behaviors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety distinct devices across 15 different focus areas were inventoried. Three hundred twenty-nine RT uses were documented over 44 hours, with only 42% of inventoried devices observed used. RT was used more during interventions (72%) than measurement (28%). Intervention devices used frequently were associated with balance/gait (39%), strength/endurance (30%), and transfer/mobility training (16%). Measurement devices were frequently used to measure vital signs (83%), followed by grip strength (7%), and upper extremity function (5%). Device characteristics were predominately electrically powered (56%), actuated (57%), monitor-less (53%), multiuse (68%), and required little familiarization (57%). Setup times were brief (mean ± SD = 3.8±4.2 and 0.8±1.3min for intervention and measurement, respectively); more time was spent with intervention RT (25.6±15min) than measurement RT (7.3±11.2min). RT nearly always involved verbal instructions (72%) with clinicians providing more feedback on performance (59.7%) than on results (30%) to their patients. Clinicians were evenly divided between providing one-on-one direct attention (49.7%) and multitasking (50.3%), such as completing documentation, when using RT with patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Even in a tech-friendly hospital, most available RTs were observed unused, especially measurement technologies. We discuss how the identified characteristics of used RT, as well as the observations about how therapists used RT, may be useful in guiding new designs. An interactive data visualization page supplement is also provided to facilitate further exploration with this dataset.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524001381\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524001381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析现实生活中康复技术的使用情况,为促进康复技术的发展和应用提供参考。设计一项采用治疗观察、半结构化模板和总结性内容分析的融合、混合方法研究。在单一卫生系统中设置10个神经康复单位。3名临床医生(1名职业治疗师,2名物理治疗师)观察了约78名职业治疗师和100名患者(N=178)。InterventionsNot适用。主要结果测量:放疗的特点,设置和使用放疗的时间,以及临床医生的行为。结果共检出15个不同重点领域的90种不同器械。在44小时内记录了329次RT使用,只有42%的设备被使用。干预期间RT的使用(72%)多于测量(28%)。经常使用的干预装置与平衡/步态(39%)、力量/耐力(30%)和转移/活动训练(16%)有关。测量设备经常用于测量生命体征(83%),其次是握力(7%)和上肢功能(5%)。设备特点主要是电动(56%)、驱动(57%)、无监护(53%)、多用途(68%)和不需要熟悉(57%)。设置时间短(干预和测量的平均±SD分别为3.8±4.2和0.8±1.3min);干预RT(25.6±15min)比测量RT(7.3±11.2min)时间长。RT几乎总是涉及口头指导(72%),临床医生向患者提供更多的表现反馈(59.7%)而不是结果反馈(30%)。临床医生平均分为提供一对一的直接关注(49.7%)和多任务处理(50.3%),如完成文件,当对患者使用RT时。结论在一家技术友好型医院中,大多数可用的RTs未被使用,尤其是测量技术。我们讨论了已使用的放射治疗的识别特征,以及对治疗师如何使用放射治疗的观察,可能对指导新设计有用。还提供了一个交互式数据可视化页面补充,以促进对该数据集的进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of Technology in the Rehabilitation Setting: Therapy Observations, Mixed Methods Analysis, and Data Visualization

Objective

To analyze real-world rehabilitation technology (RT) use, with a view toward enhancing RT development and adoption.

Design

A convergent, mixed-methods study using therapy observations, semistructured templates, and summative content analysis.

Setting

Ten neurorehabilitation units in a single health system.

Participants

Three research clinicians (1 occupational therapist [OT], 2 physical therapists [PTs]) observed approximately 78 OTs and 100 PTs (N=178).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Characteristics of RT, time spent setting up and using RT, and clinician behaviors.

Results

Ninety distinct devices across 15 different focus areas were inventoried. Three hundred twenty-nine RT uses were documented over 44 hours, with only 42% of inventoried devices observed used. RT was used more during interventions (72%) than measurement (28%). Intervention devices used frequently were associated with balance/gait (39%), strength/endurance (30%), and transfer/mobility training (16%). Measurement devices were frequently used to measure vital signs (83%), followed by grip strength (7%), and upper extremity function (5%). Device characteristics were predominately electrically powered (56%), actuated (57%), monitor-less (53%), multiuse (68%), and required little familiarization (57%). Setup times were brief (mean ± SD = 3.8±4.2 and 0.8±1.3min for intervention and measurement, respectively); more time was spent with intervention RT (25.6±15min) than measurement RT (7.3±11.2min). RT nearly always involved verbal instructions (72%) with clinicians providing more feedback on performance (59.7%) than on results (30%) to their patients. Clinicians were evenly divided between providing one-on-one direct attention (49.7%) and multitasking (50.3%), such as completing documentation, when using RT with patients.

Conclusions

Even in a tech-friendly hospital, most available RTs were observed unused, especially measurement technologies. We discuss how the identified characteristics of used RT, as well as the observations about how therapists used RT, may be useful in guiding new designs. An interactive data visualization page supplement is also provided to facilitate further exploration with this dataset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信