{"title":"我们能在住宅太阳能应用中实现公平吗?美国公众对屋顶和社区太阳能的看法","authors":"Naseem H. Dillman-Hasso, Nicole D. Sintov","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Emerging research has examined the potential for community solar to broaden access to renewables, but little to no work examines public perceptions of community solar. A United States national sample (<em>N</em> = 1433) was surveyed, testing how perceptions of instrumental (practical utility outcomes of solar adoption), environmental (environmental outcomes of solar adoption), and symbolic (identity and social status signals of solar adoption) attributes, as well as demographic variables, influence willingness to adopt both community and rooftop solar. Linear regression models find that instrumental attributes are the strongest and most robust predictor of willingness to adopt both types of solar, with smaller positive effects of symbolic and environmental attributes. Although there are fewer barriers to adopting community than rooftop solar, people are less willing to adopt the former, with results suggesting low awareness of community solar. To boost adoption, we recommend increasing awareness and emphasizing instrumental attributes of community solar. This may ultimately enhance the potential of community solar to promote equity in access to renewables.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 104022"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can we achieve equity in residential solar adoption? Public perceptions of rooftop and community solar in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Naseem H. Dillman-Hasso, Nicole D. Sintov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Emerging research has examined the potential for community solar to broaden access to renewables, but little to no work examines public perceptions of community solar. A United States national sample (<em>N</em> = 1433) was surveyed, testing how perceptions of instrumental (practical utility outcomes of solar adoption), environmental (environmental outcomes of solar adoption), and symbolic (identity and social status signals of solar adoption) attributes, as well as demographic variables, influence willingness to adopt both community and rooftop solar. Linear regression models find that instrumental attributes are the strongest and most robust predictor of willingness to adopt both types of solar, with smaller positive effects of symbolic and environmental attributes. Although there are fewer barriers to adopting community than rooftop solar, people are less willing to adopt the former, with results suggesting low awareness of community solar. To boost adoption, we recommend increasing awareness and emphasizing instrumental attributes of community solar. This may ultimately enhance the potential of community solar to promote equity in access to renewables.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can we achieve equity in residential solar adoption? Public perceptions of rooftop and community solar in the United States
Emerging research has examined the potential for community solar to broaden access to renewables, but little to no work examines public perceptions of community solar. A United States national sample (N = 1433) was surveyed, testing how perceptions of instrumental (practical utility outcomes of solar adoption), environmental (environmental outcomes of solar adoption), and symbolic (identity and social status signals of solar adoption) attributes, as well as demographic variables, influence willingness to adopt both community and rooftop solar. Linear regression models find that instrumental attributes are the strongest and most robust predictor of willingness to adopt both types of solar, with smaller positive effects of symbolic and environmental attributes. Although there are fewer barriers to adopting community than rooftop solar, people are less willing to adopt the former, with results suggesting low awareness of community solar. To boost adoption, we recommend increasing awareness and emphasizing instrumental attributes of community solar. This may ultimately enhance the potential of community solar to promote equity in access to renewables.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.