{"title":"A French view of London","authors":"Steven French","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 1939 London and Bauer published a ‘little book’ that shaped the debate over the role of consciousness in resolving the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. Mistakenly understood as merely summarising von Neumann’s account, both sides in the debate failed to appreciate its phenomenological underpinnings. London not only originally studied phenomenology but continued thinking about and discussing this approach in the years leading up to the publication of his work with Bauer, most notably with Gurwitsch, who likewise had a dual background in phenomenological philosophy and physics. In the book, <em>A Phenomenological Approach to Quantum Mechanics: Cutting the Chain of Correlations</em> (French, 2023), the historical background to London and Bauer’s work is set out prior to situating it within the context of Husserl’s philosophy as a whole. It is concluded that the London and Bauer phenomenological account offers a potentially fruitful way forward through various dichotomies, such as that between psi-ontic and psi-epistemic accounts and between interpretational and reconstructive approaches more generally, as well as with regard to understanding quantum physics more generally.</div><div>In this paper London and Bauer’s insistence that quantum mechanics should be seen as a theory of knowledge in its own right is emphasized, where this must be taken as phenomenologically grounded. Hopefully this work will be viewed as contributing to a revised phenomenological understanding of modern physics, standing alongside Ryckman’s <em>The Reign of Relativity</em> (Ryckman, 2005) and Berghofer and Wiltsche’s edited collection <em>Phenomenological Approaches to Physics</em> (Berghofer & Wiltsche, 2020).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"110 ","pages":"Pages 30-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039368125000111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1939 年,伦敦和鲍尔出版了一本 "小书",引发了关于意识在解决量子力学测量问题中的作用的争论。争论双方都误认为这本书只是对冯-诺依曼的论述进行了总结,而没有意识到这本书的现象学基础。伦敦不仅最初学习过现象学,而且在他与鲍尔的研究成果发表之前的几年里一直在思考和讨论这种方法,其中最著名的是与古尔维奇的讨论,后者同样具有现象学哲学和物理学的双重背景。在《量子力学的现象学方法》一书中:切断相关链》(法文版,2023 年)一书中,在将伦敦和鲍尔的工作置于胡塞尔哲学的整体背景下之前,先阐述了其工作的历史背景。本文强调了伦敦和鲍尔的坚持,即量子力学本身应被视为一种知识理论,而这必须以现象学为基础。希望这部著作能与雷克曼的《相对论的统治》(The Reign of Relativity)(雷克曼,2005 年)以及伯格霍夫和威尔茨彻编辑的《物理学的现象学方法》(Phenomenological Approaches to Physics)(伯格霍夫和威尔茨彻,2020 年)一起,被视为对现代物理学现象学理解的修正。
In 1939 London and Bauer published a ‘little book’ that shaped the debate over the role of consciousness in resolving the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. Mistakenly understood as merely summarising von Neumann’s account, both sides in the debate failed to appreciate its phenomenological underpinnings. London not only originally studied phenomenology but continued thinking about and discussing this approach in the years leading up to the publication of his work with Bauer, most notably with Gurwitsch, who likewise had a dual background in phenomenological philosophy and physics. In the book, A Phenomenological Approach to Quantum Mechanics: Cutting the Chain of Correlations (French, 2023), the historical background to London and Bauer’s work is set out prior to situating it within the context of Husserl’s philosophy as a whole. It is concluded that the London and Bauer phenomenological account offers a potentially fruitful way forward through various dichotomies, such as that between psi-ontic and psi-epistemic accounts and between interpretational and reconstructive approaches more generally, as well as with regard to understanding quantum physics more generally.
In this paper London and Bauer’s insistence that quantum mechanics should be seen as a theory of knowledge in its own right is emphasized, where this must be taken as phenomenologically grounded. Hopefully this work will be viewed as contributing to a revised phenomenological understanding of modern physics, standing alongside Ryckman’s The Reign of Relativity (Ryckman, 2005) and Berghofer and Wiltsche’s edited collection Phenomenological Approaches to Physics (Berghofer & Wiltsche, 2020).
期刊介绍:
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science is devoted to the integrated study of the history, philosophy and sociology of the sciences. The editors encourage contributions both in the long-established areas of the history of the sciences and the philosophy of the sciences and in the topical areas of historiography of the sciences, the sciences in relation to gender, culture and society and the sciences in relation to arts. The Journal is international in scope and content and publishes papers from a wide range of countries and cultural traditions.