产气荚膜梭菌在亚洲绵羊（Ovis aries）和山羊（Capra hircus）种群中的患病率：一项系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 2.2 3区农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES

Research in veterinary science Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105605

Wen-Xu Tan , Tong Ye , Qi-Man Zhang , Miao Zhang , Xiao-Tong Chen , Lu-Yao Tang , Meng-Ting Yang , Jing Jiang , Quan Zhao

{"title":"产气荚膜梭菌在亚洲绵羊（Ovis aries）和山羊（Capra hircus）种群中的患病率：一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Wen-Xu Tan , Tong Ye , Qi-Man Zhang , Miao Zhang , Xiao-Tong Chen , Lu-Yao Tang , Meng-Ting Yang , Jing Jiang , Quan Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>South Asia, East Asia, and Southeast Asia have consistently been the regions with the highest prevalence of <em>Clostridium perfringens</em> in sheep and goats. Given the significant economic importance of sheep and goats in these regions and the potential threat posed by this pathogen, a thorough investigation of the prevalence of <em>C. perfringens</em> in sheep and goats throughout Asia is important to inform the development of robust and effective regulatory measures to prevent its spread among sheep and goats. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to quantitatively estimate the prevalence of <em>C. perfringens</em> in sheep and goats. Through extensive searches of eligible studies in electronic databases, 29 studies were identified. The pooled prevalence estimate was 38.8 % (95 %CI: 30.9–46.9), with type A showing the highest prevalence. Additionally, the results of the subgroup analysis indicated that the prevalence of <em>C. perfringens</em> in sheep and goats varied based on factors such as age, sample type, sample size, vaccination status, and sampling time. These findings emphasise the need for vaccination and ongoing surveillance to mitigate the risk of <em>C. perfringens</em>-associated outbreaks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 105605"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Clostridium perfringens in sheep (Ovis aries) and goat (Capra hircus) populations across Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Wen-Xu Tan , Tong Ye , Qi-Man Zhang , Miao Zhang , Xiao-Tong Chen , Lu-Yao Tang , Meng-Ting Yang , Jing Jiang , Quan Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>South Asia, East Asia, and Southeast Asia have consistently been the regions with the highest prevalence of <em>Clostridium perfringens</em> in sheep and goats. Given the significant economic importance of sheep and goats in these regions and the potential threat posed by this pathogen, a thorough investigation of the prevalence of <em>C. perfringens</em> in sheep and goats throughout Asia is important to inform the development of robust and effective regulatory measures to prevent its spread among sheep and goats. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to quantitatively estimate the prevalence of <em>C. perfringens</em> in sheep and goats. Through extensive searches of eligible studies in electronic databases, 29 studies were identified. The pooled prevalence estimate was 38.8 % (95 %CI: 30.9–46.9), with type A showing the highest prevalence. Additionally, the results of the subgroup analysis indicated that the prevalence of <em>C. perfringens</em> in sheep and goats varied based on factors such as age, sample type, sample size, vaccination status, and sampling time. These findings emphasise the need for vaccination and ongoing surveillance to mitigate the risk of <em>C. perfringens</em>-associated outbreaks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in veterinary science\",\"volume\":\"187 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in veterinary science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825000797\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825000797","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

南亚、东亚和东南亚一直是绵羊和山羊中产气荚膜梭菌流行率最高的地区。鉴于这些地区绵羊和山羊的重要经济意义以及该病原体构成的潜在威胁，对整个亚洲绵羊和山羊中产气荚膜荚膜杆菌的流行情况进行彻底调查，对于制定强有力和有效的监管措施以防止其在绵羊和山羊中传播具有重要意义。在本研究中，我们根据PRISMA指南进行了系统综述和荟萃分析，以定量估计绵羊和山羊中产气荚膜荚膜杆菌的患病率。通过在电子数据库中广泛搜索符合条件的研究，确定了29项研究。合并患病率估计为38.8% (95% CI: 30.9-46.9)，其中A型患病率最高。此外，亚组分析结果表明，绵羊和山羊中产气荚膜原梭菌的患病率因年龄、样本类型、样本量、疫苗接种状况和采样时间等因素而异。这些发现强调需要进行疫苗接种和持续监测，以减轻产气荚膜梭菌相关暴发的风险。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Prevalence of Clostridium perfringens in sheep (Ovis aries) and goat (Capra hircus) populations across Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

South Asia, East Asia, and Southeast Asia have consistently been the regions with the highest prevalence of Clostridium perfringens in sheep and goats. Given the significant economic importance of sheep and goats in these regions and the potential threat posed by this pathogen, a thorough investigation of the prevalence of C. perfringens in sheep and goats throughout Asia is important to inform the development of robust and effective regulatory measures to prevent its spread among sheep and goats. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to quantitatively estimate the prevalence of C. perfringens in sheep and goats. Through extensive searches of eligible studies in electronic databases, 29 studies were identified. The pooled prevalence estimate was 38.8 % (95 %CI: 30.9–46.9), with type A showing the highest prevalence. Additionally, the results of the subgroup analysis indicated that the prevalence of C. perfringens in sheep and goats varied based on factors such as age, sample type, sample size, vaccination status, and sampling time. These findings emphasise the need for vaccination and ongoing surveillance to mitigate the risk of C. perfringens-associated outbreaks.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Research in veterinary science 农林科学-兽医学

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

4.20%

发文量

312

审稿时长

75 days

期刊介绍： Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research. The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally. High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health. Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.