Franz Bauer , Antony M. Knights , Mick E. Hanley , John N. Griffin , Andy Foggo , Austin Brown , Melanie J. Bishop , Katherine A. Dafforn , Mariana Mayer-Pinto , Louise B. Firth
{"title":"海岸带生态基础设施的热格局取决于地形复杂性和空间尺度","authors":"Franz Bauer , Antony M. Knights , Mick E. Hanley , John N. Griffin , Andy Foggo , Austin Brown , Melanie J. Bishop , Katherine A. Dafforn , Mariana Mayer-Pinto , Louise B. Firth","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Topographic complexity is a key driver of microhabitat formation, due to its critical role in providing refugia for organisms from environmental stressors. On marine infrastructure, low topographic complexity can lead to the homogenisation of associated thermal microclimates (‘thermal habitat complexity’), with potential impacts on species settlement and establishment, as well as long-term effects on biotic community composition. While marine eco-engineering techniques hold great potential for shaping thermally complex habitats through topography manipulation, effective design and implementation require a greater understanding of topography-temperature relationships. Here, we assessed <em>in situ</em> thermal patterns on a large (11 × 2 m) intertidal eco-engineering installation, using six panel topographies, five spatial scales (1, 3, 5, 10, 30 cm), two topography metrics (rugosity, fractal dimension), and two temporal factors (time since emersion, full-seawall shading). Thermal imaging, combined with 3D topographic analysis, revealed mean temperatures on topographically complex panels to be significantly lower than on flat controls across three natural air temperatures on separate days (mean air temperatures of 20, 27, 29 °C). Spatial temperature variability (i.e., thermal microhabitat range) was highest at intermediate or high topographic complexity, depending on spatial scale. Topography-driven thermal buffering increased disproportionately with air temperature. Our findings provide quantitative mechanistic insights and a proof-of-concept methodology for assessing topography-temperature relationships at high spatial resolution, with practical implications for creating complex thermal environments on urbanized shorelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 107596"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermal patterns on eco-engineered coastal infrastructure depend on topographic complexity and spatial scale\",\"authors\":\"Franz Bauer , Antony M. Knights , Mick E. Hanley , John N. Griffin , Andy Foggo , Austin Brown , Melanie J. Bishop , Katherine A. Dafforn , Mariana Mayer-Pinto , Louise B. Firth\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Topographic complexity is a key driver of microhabitat formation, due to its critical role in providing refugia for organisms from environmental stressors. On marine infrastructure, low topographic complexity can lead to the homogenisation of associated thermal microclimates (‘thermal habitat complexity’), with potential impacts on species settlement and establishment, as well as long-term effects on biotic community composition. While marine eco-engineering techniques hold great potential for shaping thermally complex habitats through topography manipulation, effective design and implementation require a greater understanding of topography-temperature relationships. Here, we assessed <em>in situ</em> thermal patterns on a large (11 × 2 m) intertidal eco-engineering installation, using six panel topographies, five spatial scales (1, 3, 5, 10, 30 cm), two topography metrics (rugosity, fractal dimension), and two temporal factors (time since emersion, full-seawall shading). Thermal imaging, combined with 3D topographic analysis, revealed mean temperatures on topographically complex panels to be significantly lower than on flat controls across three natural air temperatures on separate days (mean air temperatures of 20, 27, 29 °C). Spatial temperature variability (i.e., thermal microhabitat range) was highest at intermediate or high topographic complexity, depending on spatial scale. Topography-driven thermal buffering increased disproportionately with air temperature. Our findings provide quantitative mechanistic insights and a proof-of-concept methodology for assessing topography-temperature relationships at high spatial resolution, with practical implications for creating complex thermal environments on urbanized shorelines.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"215 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107596\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425000849\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425000849","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Thermal patterns on eco-engineered coastal infrastructure depend on topographic complexity and spatial scale
Topographic complexity is a key driver of microhabitat formation, due to its critical role in providing refugia for organisms from environmental stressors. On marine infrastructure, low topographic complexity can lead to the homogenisation of associated thermal microclimates (‘thermal habitat complexity’), with potential impacts on species settlement and establishment, as well as long-term effects on biotic community composition. While marine eco-engineering techniques hold great potential for shaping thermally complex habitats through topography manipulation, effective design and implementation require a greater understanding of topography-temperature relationships. Here, we assessed in situ thermal patterns on a large (11 × 2 m) intertidal eco-engineering installation, using six panel topographies, five spatial scales (1, 3, 5, 10, 30 cm), two topography metrics (rugosity, fractal dimension), and two temporal factors (time since emersion, full-seawall shading). Thermal imaging, combined with 3D topographic analysis, revealed mean temperatures on topographically complex panels to be significantly lower than on flat controls across three natural air temperatures on separate days (mean air temperatures of 20, 27, 29 °C). Spatial temperature variability (i.e., thermal microhabitat range) was highest at intermediate or high topographic complexity, depending on spatial scale. Topography-driven thermal buffering increased disproportionately with air temperature. Our findings provide quantitative mechanistic insights and a proof-of-concept methodology for assessing topography-temperature relationships at high spatial resolution, with practical implications for creating complex thermal environments on urbanized shorelines.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.