{"title":"利用长期移动监测对路面空气污染进行空间预测:德里的启示","authors":"Vikram Singh, Amit Agarwal","doi":"10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A rapid increase in the density of urban activities nudges for a dense air quality monitoring network. Mobile monitoring using low-cost air quality devices provides a valuable method for capturing spatiotemporal variations of pollutants in the absence of a dense air quality monitoring network. Few studies advocated using linear and nonlinear models, whereas others have utilized machine learning (ML) models for spatial prediction. However, the application in the existing studies is limited to a shorter period and smaller area. Additionally, an understanding of the selection of these models is absent. This study uses <span><math><msub><mi>PM</mi><mn>2.5</mn></msub></math></span> concentrations from 15 low-cost air quality devices deployed in buses in Delhi for over eight months to compare the performance of different model categories. <span><math><msub><mi>PM</mi><mn>2.5</mn></msub></math></span> data is aggregated at the midpoint of the 1110 road segments. Various predictor variables, which exhibit spatiotemporal variations, are used in the prediction models. Among the linear models, Backward Stepwise Regression achieved the highest R<sup>2</sup> (0.61) for the training dataset, and among ML models, Extreme Gradient Boosting exhibits the highest R<sup>2</sup> (0.98). Temperature, humidity, built-up area, building height, road length, and traffic signals are the main influencing predictor variables. ML models perform better among all model categories, whereas linear models have a smaller divergence between training and validation R<sup>2</sup>. Additionally, linear models have better prediction consistency than nonlinear and ML models. These results confirm the high performance of ML models and exhibit the potential for improving prediction accuracy by splitting the data into smaller time bins and including more road segments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48626,"journal":{"name":"Urban Climate","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 102347"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial prediction of on-road air pollution using long-term mobile monitoring: Insights from Delhi\",\"authors\":\"Vikram Singh, Amit Agarwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A rapid increase in the density of urban activities nudges for a dense air quality monitoring network. Mobile monitoring using low-cost air quality devices provides a valuable method for capturing spatiotemporal variations of pollutants in the absence of a dense air quality monitoring network. Few studies advocated using linear and nonlinear models, whereas others have utilized machine learning (ML) models for spatial prediction. However, the application in the existing studies is limited to a shorter period and smaller area. Additionally, an understanding of the selection of these models is absent. This study uses <span><math><msub><mi>PM</mi><mn>2.5</mn></msub></math></span> concentrations from 15 low-cost air quality devices deployed in buses in Delhi for over eight months to compare the performance of different model categories. <span><math><msub><mi>PM</mi><mn>2.5</mn></msub></math></span> data is aggregated at the midpoint of the 1110 road segments. Various predictor variables, which exhibit spatiotemporal variations, are used in the prediction models. Among the linear models, Backward Stepwise Regression achieved the highest R<sup>2</sup> (0.61) for the training dataset, and among ML models, Extreme Gradient Boosting exhibits the highest R<sup>2</sup> (0.98). Temperature, humidity, built-up area, building height, road length, and traffic signals are the main influencing predictor variables. ML models perform better among all model categories, whereas linear models have a smaller divergence between training and validation R<sup>2</sup>. Additionally, linear models have better prediction consistency than nonlinear and ML models. These results confirm the high performance of ML models and exhibit the potential for improving prediction accuracy by splitting the data into smaller time bins and including more road segments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Climate\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Climate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221209552500063X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Climate","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221209552500063X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Spatial prediction of on-road air pollution using long-term mobile monitoring: Insights from Delhi
A rapid increase in the density of urban activities nudges for a dense air quality monitoring network. Mobile monitoring using low-cost air quality devices provides a valuable method for capturing spatiotemporal variations of pollutants in the absence of a dense air quality monitoring network. Few studies advocated using linear and nonlinear models, whereas others have utilized machine learning (ML) models for spatial prediction. However, the application in the existing studies is limited to a shorter period and smaller area. Additionally, an understanding of the selection of these models is absent. This study uses concentrations from 15 low-cost air quality devices deployed in buses in Delhi for over eight months to compare the performance of different model categories. data is aggregated at the midpoint of the 1110 road segments. Various predictor variables, which exhibit spatiotemporal variations, are used in the prediction models. Among the linear models, Backward Stepwise Regression achieved the highest R2 (0.61) for the training dataset, and among ML models, Extreme Gradient Boosting exhibits the highest R2 (0.98). Temperature, humidity, built-up area, building height, road length, and traffic signals are the main influencing predictor variables. ML models perform better among all model categories, whereas linear models have a smaller divergence between training and validation R2. Additionally, linear models have better prediction consistency than nonlinear and ML models. These results confirm the high performance of ML models and exhibit the potential for improving prediction accuracy by splitting the data into smaller time bins and including more road segments.
期刊介绍:
Urban Climate serves the scientific and decision making communities with the publication of research on theory, science and applications relevant to understanding urban climatic conditions and change in relation to their geography and to demographic, socioeconomic, institutional, technological and environmental dynamics and global change. Targeted towards both disciplinary and interdisciplinary audiences, this journal publishes original research papers, comprehensive review articles, book reviews, and short communications on topics including, but not limited to, the following:
Urban meteorology and climate[...]
Urban environmental pollution[...]
Adaptation to global change[...]
Urban economic and social issues[...]
Research Approaches[...]