Go Yamashita, Atsushi Sugaya, Jiro Sakai, Shingo Hirao, Tatsuhiko Komiya
{"title":"瓣环-瓣尖不匹配对主动脉瓣修复术与保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术中期疗效的影响。","authors":"Go Yamashita, Atsushi Sugaya, Jiro Sakai, Shingo Hirao, Tatsuhiko Komiya","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivaf048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate mid-term outcomes of aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement based on different grades of annulus-cusp mismatch and identify optimal aortic root geometries for this procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted between October 2011 and July 2022. Patients were stratified into three groups based on predicted coaptation length calculated using an annulus-cusp mismatch formula: no-mismatch (coaptation length > 4 mm, n = 52), mild-mismatch (2 mm ≤ coaptation length ≤ 4 mm, n = 28) and severe-mismatch (coaptation length < 2 mm, n = 25), and mid-term outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 105 patients who underwent valve-sparing root replacement using the reimplantation technique. During the median follow-up of 6.0 years, 21 moderate aortic valve regurgitation events and 6 reoperation events were observed. No significant inter-group differences in overall survival or cumulative incidence of cardiac death or hospitalization for heart failure were observed. However, the groups significantly differed in the cumulative incidence of moderate aortic regurgitation at 5 years (2.0%, 14.8% and 60.1% for no-mismatch, mild-mismatch and severe-mismatch groups, respectively; P < 0.001) and cumulative incidence of reoperation at 5 years (0%, 0% and 11.8%, respectively; P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that severe annulus-cusp mismatch is associated with higher rates of valve regurgitation and reoperation following aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement; however, larger studies are needed for confirmation. Preoperative computed tomography-based assessment of annulus-cusp mismatch shows promise in surgical planning and patient selection for aortic valve repair procedures.</p><p><strong>Clinical registration number: </strong>4392.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of annulus-cusp mismatch on mid-term outcomes of aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement.\",\"authors\":\"Go Yamashita, Atsushi Sugaya, Jiro Sakai, Shingo Hirao, Tatsuhiko Komiya\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icvts/ivaf048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate mid-term outcomes of aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement based on different grades of annulus-cusp mismatch and identify optimal aortic root geometries for this procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted between October 2011 and July 2022. Patients were stratified into three groups based on predicted coaptation length calculated using an annulus-cusp mismatch formula: no-mismatch (coaptation length > 4 mm, n = 52), mild-mismatch (2 mm ≤ coaptation length ≤ 4 mm, n = 28) and severe-mismatch (coaptation length < 2 mm, n = 25), and mid-term outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 105 patients who underwent valve-sparing root replacement using the reimplantation technique. During the median follow-up of 6.0 years, 21 moderate aortic valve regurgitation events and 6 reoperation events were observed. No significant inter-group differences in overall survival or cumulative incidence of cardiac death or hospitalization for heart failure were observed. However, the groups significantly differed in the cumulative incidence of moderate aortic regurgitation at 5 years (2.0%, 14.8% and 60.1% for no-mismatch, mild-mismatch and severe-mismatch groups, respectively; P < 0.001) and cumulative incidence of reoperation at 5 years (0%, 0% and 11.8%, respectively; P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that severe annulus-cusp mismatch is associated with higher rates of valve regurgitation and reoperation following aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement; however, larger studies are needed for confirmation. Preoperative computed tomography-based assessment of annulus-cusp mismatch shows promise in surgical planning and patient selection for aortic valve repair procedures.</p><p><strong>Clinical registration number: </strong>4392.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906396/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在探讨基于不同程度的环尖不匹配的主动脉瓣修复术中保留主动脉根置换术的中期结果,并确定该手术的最佳主动脉根几何形状。方法:回顾性分析2011年10月至2022年7月的病例。根据使用环-尖错配公式计算的预测配合长度,将患者分为三组:无错配(配合长度bbb4mm, n = 52),轻度错配(2mm≤配合长度≤4mm, n = 28)和严重错配(配合长度)。结果:我们纳入了105例使用再种植技术进行保留瓣膜根置换的患者。在中位随访6.0年期间,观察到中度主动脉瓣返流事件21例,再手术事件6例。在总生存率、心源性死亡累积发生率或心力衰竭住院率方面,组间无显著差异。然而,两组在5年中度主动脉反流累积发生率上存在显著差异(无错配组、轻度错配组和严重错配组分别为2.0%、14.8%和60.1%);结论:我们的研究结果表明,严重的瓣环-瓣尖不匹配与主动脉瓣修复和保留瓣根置换术后较高的瓣膜返流率和再手术率相关;然而,这需要更大规模的研究来证实。术前基于计算机断层扫描的评估环-尖不匹配显示了手术计划和主动脉瓣修复手术患者选择的希望。
Impact of annulus-cusp mismatch on mid-term outcomes of aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate mid-term outcomes of aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement based on different grades of annulus-cusp mismatch and identify optimal aortic root geometries for this procedure.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted between October 2011 and July 2022. Patients were stratified into three groups based on predicted coaptation length calculated using an annulus-cusp mismatch formula: no-mismatch (coaptation length > 4 mm, n = 52), mild-mismatch (2 mm ≤ coaptation length ≤ 4 mm, n = 28) and severe-mismatch (coaptation length < 2 mm, n = 25), and mid-term outcomes were compared.
Results: We included 105 patients who underwent valve-sparing root replacement using the reimplantation technique. During the median follow-up of 6.0 years, 21 moderate aortic valve regurgitation events and 6 reoperation events were observed. No significant inter-group differences in overall survival or cumulative incidence of cardiac death or hospitalization for heart failure were observed. However, the groups significantly differed in the cumulative incidence of moderate aortic regurgitation at 5 years (2.0%, 14.8% and 60.1% for no-mismatch, mild-mismatch and severe-mismatch groups, respectively; P < 0.001) and cumulative incidence of reoperation at 5 years (0%, 0% and 11.8%, respectively; P = 0.002).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that severe annulus-cusp mismatch is associated with higher rates of valve regurgitation and reoperation following aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement; however, larger studies are needed for confirmation. Preoperative computed tomography-based assessment of annulus-cusp mismatch shows promise in surgical planning and patient selection for aortic valve repair procedures.