非计划再手术对诊断相关组住院患者影响的现实研究

Annals of medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1080/07853890.2025.2473633
Rui Fan, Qifeng Chen, Shang Gao, Lili Wang, Shuqi Mao, Zhiyu Yan
{"title":"非计划再手术对诊断相关组住院患者影响的现实研究","authors":"Rui Fan, Qifeng Chen, Shang Gao, Lili Wang, Shuqi Mao, Zhiyu Yan","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2025.2473633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The issue of unplanned reoperations poses significant challenges within healthcare systems, with assessing their impact being particularly difficult. The current study aimed to assess the influence of unplanned reoperations on hospitalized patients by employing the diagnosis-related group (DRG) to comprehensively consider the intensity and complexity of different medical services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of surgical patients was conducted at a large tertiary hospital with two hospital districts employing data sourced from a DRG database. Hospital length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization costs were measured as the primary outcomes. Discharge to home was measured as the secondary outcome. Frequency matching based on DRG, regression modeling, subgroup comparison and sensitivity analysis were applied to evaluate the influence of unplanned reoperations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 20820 surgical patients distributed across 79 DRGs, including 188 individuals who underwent unplanned reoperations and 20632 normal surgical patients in the same DRGs. After DRG-based frequency matching, 564 patients (188 with unplanned reoperations, 376 normal surgical patients) were included. Unplanned reoperations led to prolonged LOS (before matching: adjusted difference, 12.05 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.36-13.90 days; after matching: adjusted difference, 14.22 days, 95% CI 11.36-17.39 days), and excess hospitalization costs (before matching: adjusted difference, $4354.29, 95% CI: $3,817.70-$4928.67; after matching: adjusted difference, $5810.07, 95% CI $4481.10-$7333.09). Furthermore, patients who underwent unplanned reoperations had a reduced likelihood of being discharged to home (before matching: hazard ratio [HR] 0.27, 95% CI 0.23-0.32; after matching: HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.25-0.39). Subgroup analyses indicated that the outcomes across the various subgroups were mostly uniform. In high-level surgery subgroups (levels 3-4) and in relation to complex diseases (relative weight ≥ 2), the increase in hospitalization costs and LOS was more pronounce after unplanned reoperations. Similar results were observed with sensitivity analysis by propensity score matching and excluding short LOS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incorporating the DRG allows for a more effective assessment of the influence of unplanned reoperations. In managing such reoperations, mitigating their influence, especially in the context of high-level surgeries and complex diseases, remains a significant challenge that requires special consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"2473633"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A real-world study on the influence of unplanned reoperations on hospitalized patients using the diagnosis-related group.\",\"authors\":\"Rui Fan, Qifeng Chen, Shang Gao, Lili Wang, Shuqi Mao, Zhiyu Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07853890.2025.2473633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The issue of unplanned reoperations poses significant challenges within healthcare systems, with assessing their impact being particularly difficult. The current study aimed to assess the influence of unplanned reoperations on hospitalized patients by employing the diagnosis-related group (DRG) to comprehensively consider the intensity and complexity of different medical services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of surgical patients was conducted at a large tertiary hospital with two hospital districts employing data sourced from a DRG database. Hospital length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization costs were measured as the primary outcomes. Discharge to home was measured as the secondary outcome. Frequency matching based on DRG, regression modeling, subgroup comparison and sensitivity analysis were applied to evaluate the influence of unplanned reoperations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 20820 surgical patients distributed across 79 DRGs, including 188 individuals who underwent unplanned reoperations and 20632 normal surgical patients in the same DRGs. After DRG-based frequency matching, 564 patients (188 with unplanned reoperations, 376 normal surgical patients) were included. Unplanned reoperations led to prolonged LOS (before matching: adjusted difference, 12.05 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.36-13.90 days; after matching: adjusted difference, 14.22 days, 95% CI 11.36-17.39 days), and excess hospitalization costs (before matching: adjusted difference, $4354.29, 95% CI: $3,817.70-$4928.67; after matching: adjusted difference, $5810.07, 95% CI $4481.10-$7333.09). Furthermore, patients who underwent unplanned reoperations had a reduced likelihood of being discharged to home (before matching: hazard ratio [HR] 0.27, 95% CI 0.23-0.32; after matching: HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.25-0.39). Subgroup analyses indicated that the outcomes across the various subgroups were mostly uniform. In high-level surgery subgroups (levels 3-4) and in relation to complex diseases (relative weight ≥ 2), the increase in hospitalization costs and LOS was more pronounce after unplanned reoperations. Similar results were observed with sensitivity analysis by propensity score matching and excluding short LOS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incorporating the DRG allows for a more effective assessment of the influence of unplanned reoperations. In managing such reoperations, mitigating their influence, especially in the context of high-level surgeries and complex diseases, remains a significant challenge that requires special consideration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"2473633\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2473633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2473633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:意外再手术的问题在医疗保健系统中提出了重大挑战,评估其影响尤其困难。本研究旨在综合考虑不同医疗服务的强度和复杂性,采用诊断相关组(DRG)评估意外再手术对住院患者的影响。方法:采用来自DRG数据库的数据,在一家大型三级医院的两个医院区对手术患者进行回顾性队列研究。住院时间(LOS)和住院费用作为主要结局。出院作为次要观察指标。采用基于DRG的频率匹配、回归模型、亚组比较和敏感性分析评价计划外再手术的影响。结果:我们确定了分布在79个DRGs的20820例手术患者,其中包括188例非计划再手术患者和同一DRGs的20632例正常手术患者。基于drg的频率匹配后,纳入564例患者(188例非计划再手术,376例正常手术)。非计划再手术导致LOS延长(匹配前:调整差值,12.05天,95%置信区间[CI] 10.36-13.90天;匹配后:调整差值,14.22天,95% CI 11.36-17.39天),以及超额住院费用(匹配前:调整差值,4354.29美元,95% CI: 3817.70 - 4928.67美元;匹配后:调整后的差异,$5810.07,95% CI $4481.10-$7333.09)。此外,接受计划外再手术的患者出院回家的可能性降低(匹配前:风险比[HR] 0.27, 95% CI 0.23-0.32;匹配后:HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.25-0.39)。亚组分析表明,不同亚组的结果基本一致。在高水平手术亚组(3-4级)和复杂疾病(相对体重≥2)中,意外再手术后住院费用和LOS的增加更为明显。通过倾向评分匹配和排除短LOS的敏感性分析,观察到类似的结果。结论:纳入DRG可以更有效地评估计划外再手术的影响。在管理此类再手术时,减轻其影响,特别是在高水平手术和复杂疾病的情况下,仍然是一项需要特别考虑的重大挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A real-world study on the influence of unplanned reoperations on hospitalized patients using the diagnosis-related group.

Objective: The issue of unplanned reoperations poses significant challenges within healthcare systems, with assessing their impact being particularly difficult. The current study aimed to assess the influence of unplanned reoperations on hospitalized patients by employing the diagnosis-related group (DRG) to comprehensively consider the intensity and complexity of different medical services.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of surgical patients was conducted at a large tertiary hospital with two hospital districts employing data sourced from a DRG database. Hospital length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization costs were measured as the primary outcomes. Discharge to home was measured as the secondary outcome. Frequency matching based on DRG, regression modeling, subgroup comparison and sensitivity analysis were applied to evaluate the influence of unplanned reoperations.

Results: We identified 20820 surgical patients distributed across 79 DRGs, including 188 individuals who underwent unplanned reoperations and 20632 normal surgical patients in the same DRGs. After DRG-based frequency matching, 564 patients (188 with unplanned reoperations, 376 normal surgical patients) were included. Unplanned reoperations led to prolonged LOS (before matching: adjusted difference, 12.05 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.36-13.90 days; after matching: adjusted difference, 14.22 days, 95% CI 11.36-17.39 days), and excess hospitalization costs (before matching: adjusted difference, $4354.29, 95% CI: $3,817.70-$4928.67; after matching: adjusted difference, $5810.07, 95% CI $4481.10-$7333.09). Furthermore, patients who underwent unplanned reoperations had a reduced likelihood of being discharged to home (before matching: hazard ratio [HR] 0.27, 95% CI 0.23-0.32; after matching: HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.25-0.39). Subgroup analyses indicated that the outcomes across the various subgroups were mostly uniform. In high-level surgery subgroups (levels 3-4) and in relation to complex diseases (relative weight ≥ 2), the increase in hospitalization costs and LOS was more pronounce after unplanned reoperations. Similar results were observed with sensitivity analysis by propensity score matching and excluding short LOS.

Conclusions: Incorporating the DRG allows for a more effective assessment of the influence of unplanned reoperations. In managing such reoperations, mitigating their influence, especially in the context of high-level surgeries and complex diseases, remains a significant challenge that requires special consideration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信