氧化锆和钛植入体多探测器CT成像中减少金属伪影效果的评价。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hideki Suito, Hozumi Yoshihara, Naoki Maeda, Ryosuke Kasai, Tadashi Inoue, Masafumi Amano, Yuuri Oku, Keiko Fujimoto, Kan Nagao
{"title":"氧化锆和钛植入体多探测器CT成像中减少金属伪影效果的评价。","authors":"Hideki Suito, Hozumi Yoshihara, Naoki Maeda, Ryosuke Kasai, Tadashi Inoue, Masafumi Amano, Yuuri Oku, Keiko Fujimoto, Kan Nagao","doi":"10.1007/s11282-025-00814-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Zirconia oral implants produce larger artifacts on computed tomography (CT) compared to titanium oral implants. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of metal artifact reduction (MAR) software and dual-energy (DE) methods, which are used in multi-detector CT (MDCT) to reduce the artifacts produced by titanium and zirconia oral implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Oral implants were placed in the lower right second premolar and second molar regions of an acrylic mandible model and evaluated using MDCT. For MAR, Single Energy Metal Artifact Reaction (SEMAR) images were obtained, and for DE, images were obtained at 135 keV. The evaluation was based on 21 regions of interest (ROIs) with sides of 2.8 mm, set at 15, 25, and 35 mm from the center (the lower-right first premolar), with 65°, 90°, 115°, and 145° angles set on the buccal and lingual sides. The evaluation was based on an Artifact Index (AI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lingual aspect of the AI tended to be larger compared to the buccal aspect, regardless of the image-processing method. In addition, the SEMAR method tended to have a greater artifact reduction effect than the DE method. The distortion of the mandibular model and occurrence of new artifacts were confirmed using SEMAR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SEMAR had higher artifact reduction effects on metal artifacts than the DE method. Although SEMAR and dual-energy methods can effectively reduce metal artifacts, they also cause false images and areas that cannot be observed. Therefore, diagnostic and treatment planning, including imaging, is essential before artifact reduction processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":56103,"journal":{"name":"Oral Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the effect of reducing metal artifacts in multi-detector CT imaging of zirconia and titanium implants.\",\"authors\":\"Hideki Suito, Hozumi Yoshihara, Naoki Maeda, Ryosuke Kasai, Tadashi Inoue, Masafumi Amano, Yuuri Oku, Keiko Fujimoto, Kan Nagao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11282-025-00814-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Zirconia oral implants produce larger artifacts on computed tomography (CT) compared to titanium oral implants. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of metal artifact reduction (MAR) software and dual-energy (DE) methods, which are used in multi-detector CT (MDCT) to reduce the artifacts produced by titanium and zirconia oral implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Oral implants were placed in the lower right second premolar and second molar regions of an acrylic mandible model and evaluated using MDCT. For MAR, Single Energy Metal Artifact Reaction (SEMAR) images were obtained, and for DE, images were obtained at 135 keV. The evaluation was based on 21 regions of interest (ROIs) with sides of 2.8 mm, set at 15, 25, and 35 mm from the center (the lower-right first premolar), with 65°, 90°, 115°, and 145° angles set on the buccal and lingual sides. The evaluation was based on an Artifact Index (AI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lingual aspect of the AI tended to be larger compared to the buccal aspect, regardless of the image-processing method. In addition, the SEMAR method tended to have a greater artifact reduction effect than the DE method. The distortion of the mandibular model and occurrence of new artifacts were confirmed using SEMAR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SEMAR had higher artifact reduction effects on metal artifacts than the DE method. Although SEMAR and dual-energy methods can effectively reduce metal artifacts, they also cause false images and areas that cannot be observed. Therefore, diagnostic and treatment planning, including imaging, is essential before artifact reduction processing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-025-00814-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-025-00814-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与钛口腔种植体相比,氧化锆口腔种植体在计算机断层扫描(CT)上产生更大的伪影。本研究旨在比较金属伪影减少(MAR)软件和双能(DE)方法在多探测器CT (MDCT)中减少钛和氧化锆口腔种植体产生的伪影的效果。方法:将口腔种植体放置在丙烯酸酯下颌骨右下第二前磨牙区和第二磨牙区,并使用MDCT进行评估。对于MAR,获得了单能量金属伪影反应(SEMAR)图像,对于DE,获得了135 keV的图像。评估基于21个侧边为2.8 mm的感兴趣区域(roi),分别设置在距离中心(右下第一前磨牙)15、25和35 mm处,颊侧和舌侧分别设置65°、90°、115°和145°角。评估基于人工制品指数(AI)。结果:无论采用何种图像处理方法,人工智能的舌侧比颊侧更大。此外,SEMAR方法往往比DE方法具有更大的伪影减少效果。下颌模型的变形及新假物的出现均采用SEMAR进行确认。结论:SEMAR对金属伪影的还原效果优于DE法。虽然SEMAR和双能方法可以有效地减少金属伪影,但它们也会产生假图像和无法观察到的区域。因此,诊断和治疗计划,包括成像,在伪影减少处理之前是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the effect of reducing metal artifacts in multi-detector CT imaging of zirconia and titanium implants.

Objectives: Zirconia oral implants produce larger artifacts on computed tomography (CT) compared to titanium oral implants. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of metal artifact reduction (MAR) software and dual-energy (DE) methods, which are used in multi-detector CT (MDCT) to reduce the artifacts produced by titanium and zirconia oral implants.

Methods: Oral implants were placed in the lower right second premolar and second molar regions of an acrylic mandible model and evaluated using MDCT. For MAR, Single Energy Metal Artifact Reaction (SEMAR) images were obtained, and for DE, images were obtained at 135 keV. The evaluation was based on 21 regions of interest (ROIs) with sides of 2.8 mm, set at 15, 25, and 35 mm from the center (the lower-right first premolar), with 65°, 90°, 115°, and 145° angles set on the buccal and lingual sides. The evaluation was based on an Artifact Index (AI).

Results: The lingual aspect of the AI tended to be larger compared to the buccal aspect, regardless of the image-processing method. In addition, the SEMAR method tended to have a greater artifact reduction effect than the DE method. The distortion of the mandibular model and occurrence of new artifacts were confirmed using SEMAR.

Conclusions: SEMAR had higher artifact reduction effects on metal artifacts than the DE method. Although SEMAR and dual-energy methods can effectively reduce metal artifacts, they also cause false images and areas that cannot be observed. Therefore, diagnostic and treatment planning, including imaging, is essential before artifact reduction processing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral Radiology
Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
87
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official English-language journal of the Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and the Asian Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Oral Radiology is intended to be a forum for international collaboration in head and neck diagnostic imaging and all related fields. Oral Radiology features cutting-edge research papers, review articles, case reports, and technical notes from both the clinical and experimental fields. As membership in the Society is not a prerequisite, contributions are welcome from researchers and clinicians worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信