68ga - dopate和18F-DOPA PET扫描检测异位ACTH综合征肿瘤的前瞻性评价

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Henrik Elenius, Raven McGlotten, Chuong D Hoang, Clara C Chen, Corina Millo, Ahmed M Gharib, Lynnette K Nieman
{"title":"68ga - dopate和18F-DOPA PET扫描检测异位ACTH综合征肿瘤的前瞻性评价","authors":"Henrik Elenius, Raven McGlotten, Chuong D Hoang, Clara C Chen, Corina Millo, Ahmed M Gharib, Lynnette K Nieman","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Identification of tumors causing ectopic ACTH syndrome (EAS) is challenging. 68Ga-DOTATATE (DOTA) and 18F-DOPA (DOPA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans are promising imaging modalities warranting further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This work aimed to compare DOTA and DOPA PET/CT performance in detecting ectopic sources of adrenocorticotropin (ACTH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective comparison of DOTA, DOPA, and conventional imaging modalities in EAS was conducted at a tertiary referral center. Participants included 24 patients with EAS from neuroendocrine tumors confirmed by pathology and/or biochemical cure. Interventions included DOTA PET/CT, DOPA PET/CT, CT, MRI, gated cardiac CT/MRI, and Octreoscan (OCT) performed between 2014 and 2024. Main outcome measures included sensitivity (Se) and positive predictive value (PPV) for each imaging modality, and 7 combinations thereof, in patients with identified tumors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of functional scans, Se for DOPA was higher than OCT (Se 88%; 95% CI, 67%-97% vs 31%; 95% CI, 10%-61%) and overlapped DOTA (Se 79%; 95% CI, 57%-92%). Among structural modalities, CT had the highest Se (96%; 95% CI, 76%-100%) when interpreted knowing results of functional scans; Se was 57% (95% CI, 35%-76%) without those data. Cardiac CT/MRI had the highest PPV (100% for each). Combinations of CT/MRI plus DOTA and/or DOPA provided high PPVs (89%-100%) with Se 64% to 87%; all CIs overlapped. Combined CT and MRI without functional scans provided PPV 79% with Se 55%, although CI overlapped with combinations that included DOTA/DOPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DOTA and DOPA improve tumor detection in EAS by increasing Se of structural scans and PPV of detected lesions. The two scans are complementary and should be integral to imaging strategies for EAS. However, DOPA is not currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for this indication.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"e3794-e3802"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective Evaluation of 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-DOPA PET Scans in Detecting Tumors Causing Ectopic ACTH Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Henrik Elenius, Raven McGlotten, Chuong D Hoang, Clara C Chen, Corina Millo, Ahmed M Gharib, Lynnette K Nieman\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/clinem/dgaf114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Identification of tumors causing ectopic ACTH syndrome (EAS) is challenging. 68Ga-DOTATATE (DOTA) and 18F-DOPA (DOPA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans are promising imaging modalities warranting further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This work aimed to compare DOTA and DOPA PET/CT performance in detecting ectopic sources of adrenocorticotropin (ACTH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective comparison of DOTA, DOPA, and conventional imaging modalities in EAS was conducted at a tertiary referral center. Participants included 24 patients with EAS from neuroendocrine tumors confirmed by pathology and/or biochemical cure. Interventions included DOTA PET/CT, DOPA PET/CT, CT, MRI, gated cardiac CT/MRI, and Octreoscan (OCT) performed between 2014 and 2024. Main outcome measures included sensitivity (Se) and positive predictive value (PPV) for each imaging modality, and 7 combinations thereof, in patients with identified tumors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of functional scans, Se for DOPA was higher than OCT (Se 88%; 95% CI, 67%-97% vs 31%; 95% CI, 10%-61%) and overlapped DOTA (Se 79%; 95% CI, 57%-92%). Among structural modalities, CT had the highest Se (96%; 95% CI, 76%-100%) when interpreted knowing results of functional scans; Se was 57% (95% CI, 35%-76%) without those data. Cardiac CT/MRI had the highest PPV (100% for each). Combinations of CT/MRI plus DOTA and/or DOPA provided high PPVs (89%-100%) with Se 64% to 87%; all CIs overlapped. Combined CT and MRI without functional scans provided PPV 79% with Se 55%, although CI overlapped with combinations that included DOTA/DOPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DOTA and DOPA improve tumor detection in EAS by increasing Se of structural scans and PPV of detected lesions. The two scans are complementary and should be integral to imaging strategies for EAS. However, DOPA is not currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for this indication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e3794-e3802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527431/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf114\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鉴别引起异位ACTH综合征(EAS)的肿瘤具有挑战性。68ga - dopate (DOTA)和18F-DOPA (DOPA) PET/CT扫描是有前途的成像方式,值得进一步评估。目的:比较DOTA与DOPA PET/CT在检测ACTH异位源中的表现。设计:前瞻性比较DOTA、DOPA和EAS常规成像方式。单位:三级转诊中心。患者:经病理或生化治疗的神经内分泌肿瘤EAS患者24例。干预措施:2014-2024年间进行的DOTA PET/CT、DOPA PET/CT、CT、MRI、门控心脏CT/MRI、octrescan。主要结局指标:在确定肿瘤的患者中,每种成像方式及其7种组合的敏感性(Se)和阳性预测值(PPV)。结果:在功能扫描中,DOPA的Se高于octrescan (Se 88%, 95%CI 67% - 97% vs 31%, 95%CI 10% - 61%)和重叠DOTA (Se 79%, 95%CI 57-92%)。在结构模式中,当解释功能扫描结果时,CT具有最高的Se (96%, 95%CI 76-100%);没有这些数据,Se为57% (95%CI 35-76%)。心脏CT/MRI的PPV最高(各为100%)。CT/MRI联合DOTA和/或DOPA提供高ppv (89-100%), Se 64-87%;所有的ci都重叠了。没有功能扫描的CT和MRI联合提供了79%的PPV和55%的Se,尽管CI与包括DOTA/DOPA的组合重叠。结论:DOTA和DOPA通过提高结构扫描的Se和病变的PPV来提高EAS的肿瘤检出率。这两种扫描是互补的,应作为EAS成像策略的一部分。然而,DOPA目前尚未被fda批准用于这一适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective Evaluation of 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-DOPA PET Scans in Detecting Tumors Causing Ectopic ACTH Syndrome.

Context: Identification of tumors causing ectopic ACTH syndrome (EAS) is challenging. 68Ga-DOTATATE (DOTA) and 18F-DOPA (DOPA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans are promising imaging modalities warranting further evaluation.

Objective: This work aimed to compare DOTA and DOPA PET/CT performance in detecting ectopic sources of adrenocorticotropin (ACTH).

Methods: A prospective comparison of DOTA, DOPA, and conventional imaging modalities in EAS was conducted at a tertiary referral center. Participants included 24 patients with EAS from neuroendocrine tumors confirmed by pathology and/or biochemical cure. Interventions included DOTA PET/CT, DOPA PET/CT, CT, MRI, gated cardiac CT/MRI, and Octreoscan (OCT) performed between 2014 and 2024. Main outcome measures included sensitivity (Se) and positive predictive value (PPV) for each imaging modality, and 7 combinations thereof, in patients with identified tumors.

Results: Of functional scans, Se for DOPA was higher than OCT (Se 88%; 95% CI, 67%-97% vs 31%; 95% CI, 10%-61%) and overlapped DOTA (Se 79%; 95% CI, 57%-92%). Among structural modalities, CT had the highest Se (96%; 95% CI, 76%-100%) when interpreted knowing results of functional scans; Se was 57% (95% CI, 35%-76%) without those data. Cardiac CT/MRI had the highest PPV (100% for each). Combinations of CT/MRI plus DOTA and/or DOPA provided high PPVs (89%-100%) with Se 64% to 87%; all CIs overlapped. Combined CT and MRI without functional scans provided PPV 79% with Se 55%, although CI overlapped with combinations that included DOTA/DOPA.

Conclusion: DOTA and DOPA improve tumor detection in EAS by increasing Se of structural scans and PPV of detected lesions. The two scans are complementary and should be integral to imaging strategies for EAS. However, DOPA is not currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for this indication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信