{"title":"体质指数与军事人员体能训练相关损伤:系统回顾与元回归分析。","authors":"Weijuan Lan, J Shu, Y Liu, C Xie, J Sun, L Yuan","doi":"10.1136/military-2024-002779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Discrepancies exist in findings on how varying body mass index (BMI) levels impact physical training-related injuries across different studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the relationship between BMI and physical training-related injuries both qualitatively and quantitatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Cochrane and EMBASE databases was performed. The study selection followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using weighted data and a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were based on gender and military service branches. Heterogeneity among the studies was assessed through the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, indicating the proportion of total variation in effect size estimates. Funnel plots and Egger's test were employed to assess publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>33 studies were included in the analysis, with abnormal BMI (underweight, overweight and obesity) identified as a clear risk factor for training-related injuries (overall RR=1.21, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.27; male RR=1.16, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.23; female RR=1.05, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.09). No significant heterogeneity was observed among navy, army and air force personnel (p=0.58), although abnormal BMI remained a notable risk factor in both the army and air force. Meta-regression analysis indicated that the lowest injury risk occurred at a BMI of 23 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Obese individuals under the age of 27 and underweight individuals over the age of 27 were at high risk. Additionally, the highest injury risk was observed during the first 5 months of military training, with a gradual decline in subsequent months, stabilising by the 12th month.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that abnormal BMI increases the risk of training injuries among military personnel and that this risk varies with age and the duration of training. Emphasis should be placed on risk prevention in the early stages of military training and on enhanced protection for high-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Body mass index and physical training-related injuries in military personnel: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Weijuan Lan, J Shu, Y Liu, C Xie, J Sun, L Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/military-2024-002779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Discrepancies exist in findings on how varying body mass index (BMI) levels impact physical training-related injuries across different studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the relationship between BMI and physical training-related injuries both qualitatively and quantitatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Cochrane and EMBASE databases was performed. The study selection followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using weighted data and a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were based on gender and military service branches. Heterogeneity among the studies was assessed through the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, indicating the proportion of total variation in effect size estimates. Funnel plots and Egger's test were employed to assess publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>33 studies were included in the analysis, with abnormal BMI (underweight, overweight and obesity) identified as a clear risk factor for training-related injuries (overall RR=1.21, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.27; male RR=1.16, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.23; female RR=1.05, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.09). No significant heterogeneity was observed among navy, army and air force personnel (p=0.58), although abnormal BMI remained a notable risk factor in both the army and air force. Meta-regression analysis indicated that the lowest injury risk occurred at a BMI of 23 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Obese individuals under the age of 27 and underweight individuals over the age of 27 were at high risk. Additionally, the highest injury risk was observed during the first 5 months of military training, with a gradual decline in subsequent months, stabilising by the 12th month.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that abnormal BMI increases the risk of training injuries among military personnel and that this risk varies with age and the duration of training. Emphasis should be placed on risk prevention in the early stages of military training and on enhanced protection for high-risk populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bmj Military Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bmj Military Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2024-002779\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2024-002779","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在不同的研究中,不同的身体质量指数(BMI)水平对体育训练相关损伤的影响存在差异。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在定性和定量地评估BMI与体育训练相关损伤之间的关系。方法:综合检索MEDLINE、Cochrane和EMBASE数据库。研究选择遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。采用加权数据和随机效应模型进行系统评价和荟萃分析。分组分析以性别和兵种为基础。通过I2统计量评估研究间的异质性,表明效应大小估计值中总变异的比例。采用漏斗图和Egger检验评估发表偏倚。结果:33项研究纳入分析,BMI异常(体重过轻、超重和肥胖)被确定为训练相关损伤的明确危险因素(总RR=1.21, 95% CI 1.15 ~ 1.27;男性RR=1.16, 95% CI 1.08 ~ 1.23;女性RR=1.05, 95% CI 1.02 ~ 1.09)。海军、陆军和空军人员之间没有显著的异质性(p=0.58),尽管异常BMI仍然是陆军和空军人员的显著危险因素。meta回归分析显示,BMI为23 kg/m2时损伤风险最低。27岁以下的肥胖者和27岁以上的体重过轻者是高危人群。此外,在军事训练的前5个月观察到最高的受伤风险,随后几个月逐渐下降,到第12个月稳定下来。结论:BMI异常会增加军人训练损伤的风险,且这种风险随年龄和训练时间的长短而变化。在军事训练的早期阶段应注重风险预防,加强对高危人群的保护。
Body mass index and physical training-related injuries in military personnel: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.
Introduction: Discrepancies exist in findings on how varying body mass index (BMI) levels impact physical training-related injuries across different studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the relationship between BMI and physical training-related injuries both qualitatively and quantitatively.
Methods: A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Cochrane and EMBASE databases was performed. The study selection followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using weighted data and a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were based on gender and military service branches. Heterogeneity among the studies was assessed through the I2 statistic, indicating the proportion of total variation in effect size estimates. Funnel plots and Egger's test were employed to assess publication bias.
Results: 33 studies were included in the analysis, with abnormal BMI (underweight, overweight and obesity) identified as a clear risk factor for training-related injuries (overall RR=1.21, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.27; male RR=1.16, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.23; female RR=1.05, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.09). No significant heterogeneity was observed among navy, army and air force personnel (p=0.58), although abnormal BMI remained a notable risk factor in both the army and air force. Meta-regression analysis indicated that the lowest injury risk occurred at a BMI of 23 kg/m2. Obese individuals under the age of 27 and underweight individuals over the age of 27 were at high risk. Additionally, the highest injury risk was observed during the first 5 months of military training, with a gradual decline in subsequent months, stabilising by the 12th month.
Conclusion: Findings suggest that abnormal BMI increases the risk of training injuries among military personnel and that this risk varies with age and the duration of training. Emphasis should be placed on risk prevention in the early stages of military training and on enhanced protection for high-risk populations.