Leonard Lisitano, Zarek Hezrrai DaSilva, Nicholas Koch, Willie Dong, Tyler Thorne, Timon Röttinger, Daniel Pfeufer, Justin Haller
{"title":"实时生物反馈对部分负重训练的影响:一项比较研究。","authors":"Leonard Lisitano, Zarek Hezrrai DaSilva, Nicholas Koch, Willie Dong, Tyler Thorne, Timon Röttinger, Daniel Pfeufer, Justin Haller","doi":"10.26603/001c.129259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Partial Weight Bearing (PWB) is integral to rehabilitation protocols following orthopedic and trauma surgeries. Standard of Care (SOC) for PWB training often involves using a bathroom scale, a method criticized for its inaccuracy. This study aimed to compare SOC training in PWB with a biofeedback device (insole).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty healthy participants were randomized into SOC or Biofeedback (BF) training groups, practicing 20 kg PWB using a standardized protocol. Gait data, including compliance with weightbearing restrictions (not exceeding 150% of the set weightbearing limit), was monitored using Loadsol® insole force sensors. Participant satisfaction and usability were assessed through questionnaires. Training duration and walking speed were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BF group's peak force averaged 330 Newtons, significantly lower than the SOC group's 600 Newtons, which exceeded the prescribed limit by over three times (p ≤ 0.001). Compliance with weightbearing restrictions was substantially higher in the BF group (88% or 29/33 participants) compared to the SOC group (19% or 5/27 participants) (p ≤ 0.001). The BF group also required less training time to learn PWB, averaging 9:00 ± 3:06 minutes, versus 12:49 ± 3:01 minutes in the SOC group (p ≤ 0.001). Questionnaire responses showed no significant differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Real-time audio-visual Biofeedback significantly enhances compliance with weightbearing restrictions in PWB training while reducing the training duration. Based on these findings, the implementation of biofeedback devices in PWB training is recommended.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 3","pages":"364-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Real-Time Biofeedback on Partial Weightbearing Training: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Leonard Lisitano, Zarek Hezrrai DaSilva, Nicholas Koch, Willie Dong, Tyler Thorne, Timon Röttinger, Daniel Pfeufer, Justin Haller\",\"doi\":\"10.26603/001c.129259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Partial Weight Bearing (PWB) is integral to rehabilitation protocols following orthopedic and trauma surgeries. Standard of Care (SOC) for PWB training often involves using a bathroom scale, a method criticized for its inaccuracy. This study aimed to compare SOC training in PWB with a biofeedback device (insole).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty healthy participants were randomized into SOC or Biofeedback (BF) training groups, practicing 20 kg PWB using a standardized protocol. Gait data, including compliance with weightbearing restrictions (not exceeding 150% of the set weightbearing limit), was monitored using Loadsol® insole force sensors. Participant satisfaction and usability were assessed through questionnaires. Training duration and walking speed were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BF group's peak force averaged 330 Newtons, significantly lower than the SOC group's 600 Newtons, which exceeded the prescribed limit by over three times (p ≤ 0.001). Compliance with weightbearing restrictions was substantially higher in the BF group (88% or 29/33 participants) compared to the SOC group (19% or 5/27 participants) (p ≤ 0.001). The BF group also required less training time to learn PWB, averaging 9:00 ± 3:06 minutes, versus 12:49 ± 3:01 minutes in the SOC group (p ≤ 0.001). Questionnaire responses showed no significant differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Real-time audio-visual Biofeedback significantly enhances compliance with weightbearing restrictions in PWB training while reducing the training duration. Based on these findings, the implementation of biofeedback devices in PWB training is recommended.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"364-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872552/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.129259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.129259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
部分负重(PWB)是骨科和创伤手术后康复方案中不可或缺的一部分。PWB培训的护理标准(SOC)通常涉及使用浴室称,这种方法因其不准确而受到批评。本研究的目的是比较生物反馈装置(鞋垫)在PWB中的SOC训练。方法:60名健康受试者随机分为SOC组和BF组,采用标准化训练方案进行20 kg PWB训练。步态数据,包括遵守负重限制(不超过设定负重限制的150%),使用Loadsol®鞋垫力传感器进行监测。通过问卷调查评估参与者满意度和可用性。训练时间和步行速度也被测量。结果:BF组的峰值力平均为330牛顿,显著低于SOC组的600牛顿,超出规定限值3倍以上(p≤0.001)。与SOC组(19%或5/27)相比,BF组(88%或29/33)对负重限制的依从性要高得多(p≤0.001)。BF组学习PWB所需的训练时间也更少,平均为9:00±3:06分钟,而SOC组为12:49±3:01分钟(p≤0.001)。问卷调查结果显示各组间无显著差异。结论:实时视听生物反馈可显著提高PWB训练中负重限制的依从性,缩短训练时间。基于这些发现,建议在PWB培训中实施生物反馈装置。证据等级:3。
The Impact of Real-Time Biofeedback on Partial Weightbearing Training: A Comparative Study.
Introduction: Partial Weight Bearing (PWB) is integral to rehabilitation protocols following orthopedic and trauma surgeries. Standard of Care (SOC) for PWB training often involves using a bathroom scale, a method criticized for its inaccuracy. This study aimed to compare SOC training in PWB with a biofeedback device (insole).
Methods: Sixty healthy participants were randomized into SOC or Biofeedback (BF) training groups, practicing 20 kg PWB using a standardized protocol. Gait data, including compliance with weightbearing restrictions (not exceeding 150% of the set weightbearing limit), was monitored using Loadsol® insole force sensors. Participant satisfaction and usability were assessed through questionnaires. Training duration and walking speed were also measured.
Results: The BF group's peak force averaged 330 Newtons, significantly lower than the SOC group's 600 Newtons, which exceeded the prescribed limit by over three times (p ≤ 0.001). Compliance with weightbearing restrictions was substantially higher in the BF group (88% or 29/33 participants) compared to the SOC group (19% or 5/27 participants) (p ≤ 0.001). The BF group also required less training time to learn PWB, averaging 9:00 ± 3:06 minutes, versus 12:49 ± 3:01 minutes in the SOC group (p ≤ 0.001). Questionnaire responses showed no significant differences between groups.
Conclusion: Real-time audio-visual Biofeedback significantly enhances compliance with weightbearing restrictions in PWB training while reducing the training duration. Based on these findings, the implementation of biofeedback devices in PWB training is recommended.