在运动人群中与新发肩痛和损伤相关的危险因素:文献的系统回顾。

IF 1.6 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.129462
Paul Salamh, Garrett Bullock, Rachel Chester, Helena Daniell, Chad Cook, Matthew DeLang, Hannah-Rose Tucker, Douglas Walker, Jeremy Lewis
{"title":"在运动人群中与新发肩痛和损伤相关的危险因素:文献的系统回顾。","authors":"Paul Salamh, Garrett Bullock, Rachel Chester, Helena Daniell, Chad Cook, Matthew DeLang, Hannah-Rose Tucker, Douglas Walker, Jeremy Lewis","doi":"10.26603/001c.129462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a high incidence of shoulder injuries among overhead athletes. Identifying and understanding risk factors for these injuries, particularly those that can be modified, is a necessary step towards being able to effectively develop and implement shoulder specific injury prevention programs. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to identify risk factors associated with a new onset of shoulder pain and injury among the athletic population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic Review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was performed within PubMed, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, and EmCare databases. Studies were screened utilizing the following inclusion criteria; (a) athletes currently pain free or no history of pain at baseline, (b) athletes with shoulder and or arm pain originating from a musculoskeletal shoulder problem (c) risk factors captured prospectively (d) pathoanatomy and biomechanics in isolation or in addition to personal characteristics, etc. (e) reporting relative risk, odds ratios, and/or hazard ratios and (f) follow up ≥ 6 months. Due to data heterogeneity, only a descriptive data synthesis was performed. Data were extracted and underwent risk of bias assessment utilizing the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. PRISMA guidelines were utilized throughout.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen papers were included. A total of four studies investigated baseball, five handball, three swimming, two tennis, two military, one cricket, one American football, and one with multiple sports, totaling 7,802 athletes. The risk of bias among the included studies was rated from moderate to low overall with no single study being identified as high risk of bias. All studies designs were a level of evidence of II except for two studies that were level III. The most significant risk factors included range of motion, reduced strength, history of local/regional musculoskeletal pain, previous injury, and training load. There are inconsistencies in how injury and pain are defined within studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many risk factors are easily objectifiable and modifiable which may help in developing shoulder injury mitigation strategies. Three of the five significant risk factors for injury can be identified by objective pre-screening measures. While previous pain and injury cannot be mitigated, training loads should be closely monitored and adapted according to other risk factors and the athlete's response.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>2.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 3","pages":"315-332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors Associated with New Onset of Shoulder Pain and Injury Among the Athletic Population: A Systematic Review of the Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Salamh, Garrett Bullock, Rachel Chester, Helena Daniell, Chad Cook, Matthew DeLang, Hannah-Rose Tucker, Douglas Walker, Jeremy Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.26603/001c.129462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a high incidence of shoulder injuries among overhead athletes. Identifying and understanding risk factors for these injuries, particularly those that can be modified, is a necessary step towards being able to effectively develop and implement shoulder specific injury prevention programs. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to identify risk factors associated with a new onset of shoulder pain and injury among the athletic population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic Review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was performed within PubMed, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, and EmCare databases. Studies were screened utilizing the following inclusion criteria; (a) athletes currently pain free or no history of pain at baseline, (b) athletes with shoulder and or arm pain originating from a musculoskeletal shoulder problem (c) risk factors captured prospectively (d) pathoanatomy and biomechanics in isolation or in addition to personal characteristics, etc. (e) reporting relative risk, odds ratios, and/or hazard ratios and (f) follow up ≥ 6 months. Due to data heterogeneity, only a descriptive data synthesis was performed. Data were extracted and underwent risk of bias assessment utilizing the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. PRISMA guidelines were utilized throughout.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen papers were included. A total of four studies investigated baseball, five handball, three swimming, two tennis, two military, one cricket, one American football, and one with multiple sports, totaling 7,802 athletes. The risk of bias among the included studies was rated from moderate to low overall with no single study being identified as high risk of bias. All studies designs were a level of evidence of II except for two studies that were level III. The most significant risk factors included range of motion, reduced strength, history of local/regional musculoskeletal pain, previous injury, and training load. There are inconsistencies in how injury and pain are defined within studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many risk factors are easily objectifiable and modifiable which may help in developing shoulder injury mitigation strategies. Three of the five significant risk factors for injury can be identified by objective pre-screening measures. While previous pain and injury cannot be mitigated, training loads should be closely monitored and adapted according to other risk factors and the athlete's response.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"315-332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872537/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.129462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.129462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肩伤在头顶运动员中发病率很高。识别和了解这些损伤的风险因素,特别是那些可以改变的,是能够有效地制定和实施肩部损伤预防计划的必要步骤。因此,本系统综述的目的是确定与运动人群中新发肩痛和损伤相关的危险因素。设计:系统评价。方法:在PubMed、Embase、AMED、CINAHL和EmCare数据库中对文献进行系统综述。采用以下纳入标准筛选研究;(a)目前无疼痛或基线时无疼痛史的运动员,(b)肩部和/或手臂疼痛源自肩部肌肉骨骼问题的运动员(c)前瞻性捕获的危险因素(d)单独或除个人特征外的病理解剖学和生物力学等(e)报告相对风险、优势比和/或风险比,以及(f)随访≥6个月。由于数据异质性,仅进行描述性数据综合。提取数据并利用预后质量研究(QUIPS)工具进行偏倚风险评估。PRISMA准则贯穿始终。结果:共纳入论文19篇。共有4项研究调查了棒球、5项手球、3项游泳、2项网球、2项军事、1项板球、1项美式足球和1项多项运动,共计7802名运动员。纳入研究的偏倚风险从中等到低,没有一项研究被确定为高偏倚风险。除两项研究为III级证据外,所有研究设计均为II级证据。最重要的危险因素包括活动范围、力量减弱、局部/区域肌肉骨骼疼痛史、既往损伤和训练负荷。研究中对损伤和疼痛的定义不一致。结论:许多危险因素易于客观化和修改,有助于制定减轻肩部损伤的策略。五个重大伤害危险因素中的三个可以通过客观的预筛选措施确定。虽然以前的疼痛和损伤不能减轻,但应密切监测训练负荷,并根据其他风险因素和运动员的反应进行调整。证据等级:2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Factors Associated with New Onset of Shoulder Pain and Injury Among the Athletic Population: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Introduction: There is a high incidence of shoulder injuries among overhead athletes. Identifying and understanding risk factors for these injuries, particularly those that can be modified, is a necessary step towards being able to effectively develop and implement shoulder specific injury prevention programs. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to identify risk factors associated with a new onset of shoulder pain and injury among the athletic population.

Design: Systematic Review.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed within PubMed, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, and EmCare databases. Studies were screened utilizing the following inclusion criteria; (a) athletes currently pain free or no history of pain at baseline, (b) athletes with shoulder and or arm pain originating from a musculoskeletal shoulder problem (c) risk factors captured prospectively (d) pathoanatomy and biomechanics in isolation or in addition to personal characteristics, etc. (e) reporting relative risk, odds ratios, and/or hazard ratios and (f) follow up ≥ 6 months. Due to data heterogeneity, only a descriptive data synthesis was performed. Data were extracted and underwent risk of bias assessment utilizing the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. PRISMA guidelines were utilized throughout.

Results: Nineteen papers were included. A total of four studies investigated baseball, five handball, three swimming, two tennis, two military, one cricket, one American football, and one with multiple sports, totaling 7,802 athletes. The risk of bias among the included studies was rated from moderate to low overall with no single study being identified as high risk of bias. All studies designs were a level of evidence of II except for two studies that were level III. The most significant risk factors included range of motion, reduced strength, history of local/regional musculoskeletal pain, previous injury, and training load. There are inconsistencies in how injury and pain are defined within studies.

Conclusion: Many risk factors are easily objectifiable and modifiable which may help in developing shoulder injury mitigation strategies. Three of the five significant risk factors for injury can be identified by objective pre-screening measures. While previous pain and injury cannot be mitigated, training loads should be closely monitored and adapted according to other risk factors and the athlete's response.

Level of evidence: 2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信