Ryan Jenkins, Anastasia Rowland-Seymour, Erin Gentry Lamb
{"title":"生命结束时的价值与不确定性:临床前医学院学生的标准化病例。","authors":"Ryan Jenkins, Anastasia Rowland-Seymour, Erin Gentry Lamb","doi":"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physician learners desire more and higher-quality education on end-of-life care. Challenges include the inherent difficulties of clinical uncertainty and how to provide meaningful experiences for early learners. This standardized patient (SP) encounter features a patient facing a newly terminal diagnosis. The patient's goals and values are not specific, and the encounter has an open-ended resolution. This low-stakes formative exercise was administered to preclinical medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Designed as part of a broader research project on using humanities to teach end-of-life care to medical students, our case was administered to 178 second-year students (98% of the class) as a required part of their simulation curriculum. Students (<i>n</i> = 171, 96%, consented for research participation) and SPs answered posttest Likert-scale questions assessing student comfort, confidence, and performance during the encounter. Students (<i>n</i> = 175, 96% of the class) later provided feedback as part of an overall curriculum evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students found the case anxiety-provoking (<i>M</i> = 4.8/7.0) but felt comfortable while performing (<i>M</i> = 4.7/7.0) and expressed confidence in their ability to admit uncertainty (<i>M</i> = 5.7/7.0). SPs found students performed well at eliciting goals of care (<i>M</i> = 5.8/7.0) and creating plans (<i>M</i> = 6.3/7.0). On retrospective evaluation, students felt the case accessed the uncertainty learning objective (98% agreed or strongly agreed).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The case feasibly targeted the uncertainty- and prognosis-related learning objectives. Students found it challenging but performed well and rated their experience positively. We discuss overall strengths and areas for improvement as well as options for future implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36910,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","volume":"21 ","pages":"11503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Values and Uncertainty at End of Life: A Standardized Patient Case for Preclinical Medical Students.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Jenkins, Anastasia Rowland-Seymour, Erin Gentry Lamb\",\"doi\":\"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physician learners desire more and higher-quality education on end-of-life care. Challenges include the inherent difficulties of clinical uncertainty and how to provide meaningful experiences for early learners. This standardized patient (SP) encounter features a patient facing a newly terminal diagnosis. The patient's goals and values are not specific, and the encounter has an open-ended resolution. This low-stakes formative exercise was administered to preclinical medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Designed as part of a broader research project on using humanities to teach end-of-life care to medical students, our case was administered to 178 second-year students (98% of the class) as a required part of their simulation curriculum. Students (<i>n</i> = 171, 96%, consented for research participation) and SPs answered posttest Likert-scale questions assessing student comfort, confidence, and performance during the encounter. Students (<i>n</i> = 175, 96% of the class) later provided feedback as part of an overall curriculum evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students found the case anxiety-provoking (<i>M</i> = 4.8/7.0) but felt comfortable while performing (<i>M</i> = 4.7/7.0) and expressed confidence in their ability to admit uncertainty (<i>M</i> = 5.7/7.0). SPs found students performed well at eliciting goals of care (<i>M</i> = 5.8/7.0) and creating plans (<i>M</i> = 6.3/7.0). On retrospective evaluation, students felt the case accessed the uncertainty learning objective (98% agreed or strongly agreed).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The case feasibly targeted the uncertainty- and prognosis-related learning objectives. Students found it challenging but performed well and rated their experience positively. We discuss overall strengths and areas for improvement as well as options for future implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"11503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876469/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Values and Uncertainty at End of Life: A Standardized Patient Case for Preclinical Medical Students.
Introduction: Physician learners desire more and higher-quality education on end-of-life care. Challenges include the inherent difficulties of clinical uncertainty and how to provide meaningful experiences for early learners. This standardized patient (SP) encounter features a patient facing a newly terminal diagnosis. The patient's goals and values are not specific, and the encounter has an open-ended resolution. This low-stakes formative exercise was administered to preclinical medical students.
Methods: Designed as part of a broader research project on using humanities to teach end-of-life care to medical students, our case was administered to 178 second-year students (98% of the class) as a required part of their simulation curriculum. Students (n = 171, 96%, consented for research participation) and SPs answered posttest Likert-scale questions assessing student comfort, confidence, and performance during the encounter. Students (n = 175, 96% of the class) later provided feedback as part of an overall curriculum evaluation.
Results: Students found the case anxiety-provoking (M = 4.8/7.0) but felt comfortable while performing (M = 4.7/7.0) and expressed confidence in their ability to admit uncertainty (M = 5.7/7.0). SPs found students performed well at eliciting goals of care (M = 5.8/7.0) and creating plans (M = 6.3/7.0). On retrospective evaluation, students felt the case accessed the uncertainty learning objective (98% agreed or strongly agreed).
Discussion: The case feasibly targeted the uncertainty- and prognosis-related learning objectives. Students found it challenging but performed well and rated their experience positively. We discuss overall strengths and areas for improvement as well as options for future implementation.