Kelley M Swanberg, Martin Gajdošík, Karl Landheer, Michael Treacy, Christoph Juchem
{"title":"样条基线模型灵活性独立影响体内质子磁共振光谱拟合的准确性和精度,以代谢物特异性的方式,而不是由拟合残差直观预测。","authors":"Kelley M Swanberg, Martin Gajdošík, Karl Landheer, Michael Treacy, Christoph Juchem","doi":"10.1002/nbm.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (<sup>1</sup>H-MRS) data often exhibit baselines or low-amplitude signal variations resulting from residual water, imperfectly suppressed lipids, low-amplitude metabolites not considered for fitting, and other features not represented in a basis set. While multitudinous approaches exist to model these baselines in <sup>1</sup>H-MR spectral analysis, many continue to lack systematic validation against varied and realistic ground-truth standards. Here, we compare the accuracy (error mean) and precision (error standard deviation) of metabolite scaling estimates by linear combination modeling (LCM) spectral fitting accounting for spectral baselines via smoothed cubic splines at 50 different combinations of fixed knot interval and smoothing weight, either with or without additionally simulated Gaussian basis signals to separately model spectral macromolecules. Synthesized in-vivo-like metabolite brain spectra incorporating macromolecule signals measured using double-inversion-recovery-prepared sLASER (T<sub>E</sub> 20.1 ms; T<sub>R</sub> 2 s; T<sub>I1</sub> 920 ms; T<sub>I2</sub> 330 ms) at 3 T from single voxels in the frontal and occipital cortex of 10 healthy volunteers (five female; 23 ± 5 y.o.) provided both in vivo realism and a standard ground truth for error calculation. Optimal baseline flexibility differed both by definition of \"optimum\" as either accuracy or precision and by metabolite. Regardless of definition or metabolite, optimal models were not those yielding the smallest fit residuals. Optimized spline baseline definitions yielded high accuracies (lowest mean error -0.003 ± 2.1% for total N-acetyl aspartate and highest mean error 10.1 ± 19.2% for glutamate + glutamine within fits including macromolecule bases) as well as comparable precision for most metabolites to fits achieved in LCModel; inclusion of simulated macromolecules in baseline models improved maximum fit precision but not accuracy. Taken together, these data illustrate that optimized spline baseline model flexibility exhibits metabolite-specific relationships with <sup>1</sup>H-MR spectral quantification accuracy or precision not readily predicted by visual inspection of associated fit residuals and not necessarily improved by adaptive relative to absolute constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":19309,"journal":{"name":"NMR in Biomedicine","volume":"38 4","pages":"e70010"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spline Baseline Model Flexibility Independently Affects the Accuracy and Precision of In Vivo Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectral Fitting in a Metabolite-Specific Manner Not Visually Predicted by Fit Residuals.\",\"authors\":\"Kelley M Swanberg, Martin Gajdošík, Karl Landheer, Michael Treacy, Christoph Juchem\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nbm.70010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (<sup>1</sup>H-MRS) data often exhibit baselines or low-amplitude signal variations resulting from residual water, imperfectly suppressed lipids, low-amplitude metabolites not considered for fitting, and other features not represented in a basis set. While multitudinous approaches exist to model these baselines in <sup>1</sup>H-MR spectral analysis, many continue to lack systematic validation against varied and realistic ground-truth standards. Here, we compare the accuracy (error mean) and precision (error standard deviation) of metabolite scaling estimates by linear combination modeling (LCM) spectral fitting accounting for spectral baselines via smoothed cubic splines at 50 different combinations of fixed knot interval and smoothing weight, either with or without additionally simulated Gaussian basis signals to separately model spectral macromolecules. Synthesized in-vivo-like metabolite brain spectra incorporating macromolecule signals measured using double-inversion-recovery-prepared sLASER (T<sub>E</sub> 20.1 ms; T<sub>R</sub> 2 s; T<sub>I1</sub> 920 ms; T<sub>I2</sub> 330 ms) at 3 T from single voxels in the frontal and occipital cortex of 10 healthy volunteers (five female; 23 ± 5 y.o.) provided both in vivo realism and a standard ground truth for error calculation. Optimal baseline flexibility differed both by definition of \\\"optimum\\\" as either accuracy or precision and by metabolite. Regardless of definition or metabolite, optimal models were not those yielding the smallest fit residuals. Optimized spline baseline definitions yielded high accuracies (lowest mean error -0.003 ± 2.1% for total N-acetyl aspartate and highest mean error 10.1 ± 19.2% for glutamate + glutamine within fits including macromolecule bases) as well as comparable precision for most metabolites to fits achieved in LCModel; inclusion of simulated macromolecules in baseline models improved maximum fit precision but not accuracy. Taken together, these data illustrate that optimized spline baseline model flexibility exhibits metabolite-specific relationships with <sup>1</sup>H-MR spectral quantification accuracy or precision not readily predicted by visual inspection of associated fit residuals and not necessarily improved by adaptive relative to absolute constraints.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NMR in Biomedicine\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"e70010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NMR in Biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMR in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Spline Baseline Model Flexibility Independently Affects the Accuracy and Precision of In Vivo Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectral Fitting in a Metabolite-Specific Manner Not Visually Predicted by Fit Residuals.
In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) data often exhibit baselines or low-amplitude signal variations resulting from residual water, imperfectly suppressed lipids, low-amplitude metabolites not considered for fitting, and other features not represented in a basis set. While multitudinous approaches exist to model these baselines in 1H-MR spectral analysis, many continue to lack systematic validation against varied and realistic ground-truth standards. Here, we compare the accuracy (error mean) and precision (error standard deviation) of metabolite scaling estimates by linear combination modeling (LCM) spectral fitting accounting for spectral baselines via smoothed cubic splines at 50 different combinations of fixed knot interval and smoothing weight, either with or without additionally simulated Gaussian basis signals to separately model spectral macromolecules. Synthesized in-vivo-like metabolite brain spectra incorporating macromolecule signals measured using double-inversion-recovery-prepared sLASER (TE 20.1 ms; TR 2 s; TI1 920 ms; TI2 330 ms) at 3 T from single voxels in the frontal and occipital cortex of 10 healthy volunteers (five female; 23 ± 5 y.o.) provided both in vivo realism and a standard ground truth for error calculation. Optimal baseline flexibility differed both by definition of "optimum" as either accuracy or precision and by metabolite. Regardless of definition or metabolite, optimal models were not those yielding the smallest fit residuals. Optimized spline baseline definitions yielded high accuracies (lowest mean error -0.003 ± 2.1% for total N-acetyl aspartate and highest mean error 10.1 ± 19.2% for glutamate + glutamine within fits including macromolecule bases) as well as comparable precision for most metabolites to fits achieved in LCModel; inclusion of simulated macromolecules in baseline models improved maximum fit precision but not accuracy. Taken together, these data illustrate that optimized spline baseline model flexibility exhibits metabolite-specific relationships with 1H-MR spectral quantification accuracy or precision not readily predicted by visual inspection of associated fit residuals and not necessarily improved by adaptive relative to absolute constraints.
期刊介绍:
NMR in Biomedicine is a journal devoted to the publication of original full-length papers, rapid communications and review articles describing the development of magnetic resonance spectroscopy or imaging methods or their use to investigate physiological, biochemical, biophysical or medical problems. Topics for submitted papers should be in one of the following general categories: (a) development of methods and instrumentation for MR of biological systems; (b) studies of normal or diseased organs, tissues or cells; (c) diagnosis or treatment of disease. Reports may cover work on patients or healthy human subjects, in vivo animal experiments, studies of isolated organs or cultured cells, analysis of tissue extracts, NMR theory, experimental techniques, or instrumentation.