样条基线模型灵活性独立影响体内质子磁共振光谱拟合的准确性和精度,以代谢物特异性的方式,而不是由拟合残差直观预测。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Kelley M Swanberg, Martin Gajdošík, Karl Landheer, Michael Treacy, Christoph Juchem
{"title":"样条基线模型灵活性独立影响体内质子磁共振光谱拟合的准确性和精度,以代谢物特异性的方式,而不是由拟合残差直观预测。","authors":"Kelley M Swanberg, Martin Gajdošík, Karl Landheer, Michael Treacy, Christoph Juchem","doi":"10.1002/nbm.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (<sup>1</sup>H-MRS) data often exhibit baselines or low-amplitude signal variations resulting from residual water, imperfectly suppressed lipids, low-amplitude metabolites not considered for fitting, and other features not represented in a basis set. While multitudinous approaches exist to model these baselines in <sup>1</sup>H-MR spectral analysis, many continue to lack systematic validation against varied and realistic ground-truth standards. Here, we compare the accuracy (error mean) and precision (error standard deviation) of metabolite scaling estimates by linear combination modeling (LCM) spectral fitting accounting for spectral baselines via smoothed cubic splines at 50 different combinations of fixed knot interval and smoothing weight, either with or without additionally simulated Gaussian basis signals to separately model spectral macromolecules. Synthesized in-vivo-like metabolite brain spectra incorporating macromolecule signals measured using double-inversion-recovery-prepared sLASER (T<sub>E</sub> 20.1 ms; T<sub>R</sub> 2 s; T<sub>I1</sub> 920 ms; T<sub>I2</sub> 330 ms) at 3 T from single voxels in the frontal and occipital cortex of 10 healthy volunteers (five female; 23 ± 5 y.o.) provided both in vivo realism and a standard ground truth for error calculation. Optimal baseline flexibility differed both by definition of \"optimum\" as either accuracy or precision and by metabolite. Regardless of definition or metabolite, optimal models were not those yielding the smallest fit residuals. Optimized spline baseline definitions yielded high accuracies (lowest mean error -0.003 ± 2.1% for total N-acetyl aspartate and highest mean error 10.1 ± 19.2% for glutamate + glutamine within fits including macromolecule bases) as well as comparable precision for most metabolites to fits achieved in LCModel; inclusion of simulated macromolecules in baseline models improved maximum fit precision but not accuracy. Taken together, these data illustrate that optimized spline baseline model flexibility exhibits metabolite-specific relationships with <sup>1</sup>H-MR spectral quantification accuracy or precision not readily predicted by visual inspection of associated fit residuals and not necessarily improved by adaptive relative to absolute constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":19309,"journal":{"name":"NMR in Biomedicine","volume":"38 4","pages":"e70010"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spline Baseline Model Flexibility Independently Affects the Accuracy and Precision of In Vivo Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectral Fitting in a Metabolite-Specific Manner Not Visually Predicted by Fit Residuals.\",\"authors\":\"Kelley M Swanberg, Martin Gajdošík, Karl Landheer, Michael Treacy, Christoph Juchem\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nbm.70010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (<sup>1</sup>H-MRS) data often exhibit baselines or low-amplitude signal variations resulting from residual water, imperfectly suppressed lipids, low-amplitude metabolites not considered for fitting, and other features not represented in a basis set. While multitudinous approaches exist to model these baselines in <sup>1</sup>H-MR spectral analysis, many continue to lack systematic validation against varied and realistic ground-truth standards. Here, we compare the accuracy (error mean) and precision (error standard deviation) of metabolite scaling estimates by linear combination modeling (LCM) spectral fitting accounting for spectral baselines via smoothed cubic splines at 50 different combinations of fixed knot interval and smoothing weight, either with or without additionally simulated Gaussian basis signals to separately model spectral macromolecules. Synthesized in-vivo-like metabolite brain spectra incorporating macromolecule signals measured using double-inversion-recovery-prepared sLASER (T<sub>E</sub> 20.1 ms; T<sub>R</sub> 2 s; T<sub>I1</sub> 920 ms; T<sub>I2</sub> 330 ms) at 3 T from single voxels in the frontal and occipital cortex of 10 healthy volunteers (five female; 23 ± 5 y.o.) provided both in vivo realism and a standard ground truth for error calculation. Optimal baseline flexibility differed both by definition of \\\"optimum\\\" as either accuracy or precision and by metabolite. Regardless of definition or metabolite, optimal models were not those yielding the smallest fit residuals. Optimized spline baseline definitions yielded high accuracies (lowest mean error -0.003 ± 2.1% for total N-acetyl aspartate and highest mean error 10.1 ± 19.2% for glutamate + glutamine within fits including macromolecule bases) as well as comparable precision for most metabolites to fits achieved in LCModel; inclusion of simulated macromolecules in baseline models improved maximum fit precision but not accuracy. Taken together, these data illustrate that optimized spline baseline model flexibility exhibits metabolite-specific relationships with <sup>1</sup>H-MR spectral quantification accuracy or precision not readily predicted by visual inspection of associated fit residuals and not necessarily improved by adaptive relative to absolute constraints.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NMR in Biomedicine\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"e70010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NMR in Biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMR in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体内质子磁共振波谱(1H-MRS)数据通常表现出由残留水、不完全抑制的脂质、未考虑拟合的低幅度代谢物以及未在基集中表示的其他特征引起的基线或低幅度信号变化。虽然有许多方法可以在1H-MR光谱分析中对这些基线进行建模,但许多方法仍然缺乏针对各种现实的地基真值标准的系统验证。在这里,我们比较了线性组合建模(LCM)光谱拟合在50种不同的固定结间隔和平滑权值组合下,通过平滑三次样条曲线计算光谱基线的代谢物尺度估计的精度(误差平均值)和精度(误差标准差),无论是否额外模拟高斯基信号来单独模拟光谱大分子。采用双反转恢复制备的激光(TE 20.1 ms)测量含大分子信号的合成体内样代谢物脑谱;TR 2 s;TI1 920 ms;10名健康志愿者(5名女性;23±5 y.o)为误差计算提供了活体真实感和标准基础真值。最佳基线灵活性的不同之处在于“最佳”定义的准确性或精密度以及代谢物。无论定义或代谢物,最佳模型不是产生最小拟合残差的模型。优化的样条基线定义具有较高的准确性(包括大分子碱基在内的拟合中,总n -乙酰天冬氨酸的最低平均误差为-0.003±2.1%,谷氨酸+谷氨酰胺的最高平均误差为10.1±19.2%),并且大多数代谢物的精度与LCModel的拟合相当;在基线模型中加入模拟大分子可提高最大拟合精度,但不能提高精度。综上所述,这些数据表明,优化的样条基线模型灵活性与1H-MR光谱量化准确度或精度之间存在代谢物特异性关系,这种关系不易通过目测相关拟合残差预测,也不一定通过相对于绝对约束的自适应来改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spline Baseline Model Flexibility Independently Affects the Accuracy and Precision of In Vivo Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectral Fitting in a Metabolite-Specific Manner Not Visually Predicted by Fit Residuals.

In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) data often exhibit baselines or low-amplitude signal variations resulting from residual water, imperfectly suppressed lipids, low-amplitude metabolites not considered for fitting, and other features not represented in a basis set. While multitudinous approaches exist to model these baselines in 1H-MR spectral analysis, many continue to lack systematic validation against varied and realistic ground-truth standards. Here, we compare the accuracy (error mean) and precision (error standard deviation) of metabolite scaling estimates by linear combination modeling (LCM) spectral fitting accounting for spectral baselines via smoothed cubic splines at 50 different combinations of fixed knot interval and smoothing weight, either with or without additionally simulated Gaussian basis signals to separately model spectral macromolecules. Synthesized in-vivo-like metabolite brain spectra incorporating macromolecule signals measured using double-inversion-recovery-prepared sLASER (TE 20.1 ms; TR 2 s; TI1 920 ms; TI2 330 ms) at 3 T from single voxels in the frontal and occipital cortex of 10 healthy volunteers (five female; 23 ± 5 y.o.) provided both in vivo realism and a standard ground truth for error calculation. Optimal baseline flexibility differed both by definition of "optimum" as either accuracy or precision and by metabolite. Regardless of definition or metabolite, optimal models were not those yielding the smallest fit residuals. Optimized spline baseline definitions yielded high accuracies (lowest mean error -0.003 ± 2.1% for total N-acetyl aspartate and highest mean error 10.1 ± 19.2% for glutamate + glutamine within fits including macromolecule bases) as well as comparable precision for most metabolites to fits achieved in LCModel; inclusion of simulated macromolecules in baseline models improved maximum fit precision but not accuracy. Taken together, these data illustrate that optimized spline baseline model flexibility exhibits metabolite-specific relationships with 1H-MR spectral quantification accuracy or precision not readily predicted by visual inspection of associated fit residuals and not necessarily improved by adaptive relative to absolute constraints.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NMR in Biomedicine
NMR in Biomedicine 医学-光谱学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
209
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: NMR in Biomedicine is a journal devoted to the publication of original full-length papers, rapid communications and review articles describing the development of magnetic resonance spectroscopy or imaging methods or their use to investigate physiological, biochemical, biophysical or medical problems. Topics for submitted papers should be in one of the following general categories: (a) development of methods and instrumentation for MR of biological systems; (b) studies of normal or diseased organs, tissues or cells; (c) diagnosis or treatment of disease. Reports may cover work on patients or healthy human subjects, in vivo animal experiments, studies of isolated organs or cultured cells, analysis of tissue extracts, NMR theory, experimental techniques, or instrumentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信