使用呼吸运动减少块改善肿瘤PET/CT解剖对齐和图像质量。

IF 1 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hajime Ichikawa, Takayuki Shibutani, Toyohiro Kato, Tomoya Banno, Mitsuaki Terabe, Hideki Shimada
{"title":"使用呼吸运动减少块改善肿瘤PET/CT解剖对齐和图像质量。","authors":"Hajime Ichikawa, Takayuki Shibutani, Toyohiro Kato, Tomoya Banno, Mitsuaki Terabe, Hideki Shimada","doi":"10.2967/jnmt.124.269096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT is crucial for cancer diagnosis; however, respiratory motion often causes misregistration between PET and CT images. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a custom-made respiratory motion reduction block (RRB) in reducing misregistration and improving image quality in <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT. <b>Methods:</b> The RRB was developed to minimize the effects of respiratory motion. It is a pentagonal block made of Styrofoam designed to compress the upper abdomen. This study included 170 patients who underwent whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on the CT and PET scanning technique used: a control free-breathing (FB) group (breath-holding [BH] CT without RRB and respiration-gated [RG] PET), a control RG group (BH CT without RRB with RG PET), a BH RRB group (BH CT with RRB), and a FB RRB group (FB CT with RRB). Various parameters, including the incidence rate and distance of anatomic misregistration, and signal-to-noise ratio, were measured and compared. <b>Results:</b> For the control FB, control RG, BH RRB, and FB RRB groups, the incidence rates of anatomic misregistration between PET and CT images were 47.1%, 27.5%, 34.0%, and 16.7%, respectively. The mean misregistration distances in these groups were 5.1 ± 6.0, 3.1 ± 5.5, 3.8 ± 6.2, and 1.3 ± 3.2 mm, respectively. Furthermore, the RRB improved the signal-to-noise ratio of the liver. <b>Conclusion:</b> The RRB effectively improved registration between PET and CT images. Our approach is cost-effective and provides respiratory motion suppression not only during PET but also during CT scans. The use of RRB with FB PET scanning was found to be more beneficial than respiratory gating.</p>","PeriodicalId":16548,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement of Anatomic Alignment and Image Quality Using a Respiratory Motion Reduction Block in Oncologic PET/CT.\",\"authors\":\"Hajime Ichikawa, Takayuki Shibutani, Toyohiro Kato, Tomoya Banno, Mitsuaki Terabe, Hideki Shimada\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnmt.124.269096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT is crucial for cancer diagnosis; however, respiratory motion often causes misregistration between PET and CT images. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a custom-made respiratory motion reduction block (RRB) in reducing misregistration and improving image quality in <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT. <b>Methods:</b> The RRB was developed to minimize the effects of respiratory motion. It is a pentagonal block made of Styrofoam designed to compress the upper abdomen. This study included 170 patients who underwent whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on the CT and PET scanning technique used: a control free-breathing (FB) group (breath-holding [BH] CT without RRB and respiration-gated [RG] PET), a control RG group (BH CT without RRB with RG PET), a BH RRB group (BH CT with RRB), and a FB RRB group (FB CT with RRB). Various parameters, including the incidence rate and distance of anatomic misregistration, and signal-to-noise ratio, were measured and compared. <b>Results:</b> For the control FB, control RG, BH RRB, and FB RRB groups, the incidence rates of anatomic misregistration between PET and CT images were 47.1%, 27.5%, 34.0%, and 16.7%, respectively. The mean misregistration distances in these groups were 5.1 ± 6.0, 3.1 ± 5.5, 3.8 ± 6.2, and 1.3 ± 3.2 mm, respectively. Furthermore, the RRB improved the signal-to-noise ratio of the liver. <b>Conclusion:</b> The RRB effectively improved registration between PET and CT images. Our approach is cost-effective and provides respiratory motion suppression not only during PET but also during CT scans. The use of RRB with FB PET scanning was found to be more beneficial than respiratory gating.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.124.269096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.124.269096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

18F-FDG PET/CT对癌症诊断至关重要;然而,呼吸运动经常导致PET和CT图像之间的配准错误。本研究旨在评估定制呼吸运动减少块(RRB)在减少18F-FDG PET/CT误配和提高图像质量方面的影响。方法:开发RRB,以尽量减少呼吸运动的影响。它是一个由泡沫塑料制成的五角形块,用来压缩上腹部。本研究包括170例接受全身18F-FDG PET/CT的患者。根据使用的CT和PET扫描技术将患者分为4组:控制自由呼吸(FB)组(屏气[BH] CT不带RRB和呼吸控制[RG] PET),控制RG组(不带RRB的BH CT加RG PET), BH RRB组(BH CT加RRB), FB RRB组(FB CT加RRB)。测量和比较各参数,包括解剖错配的发生率和距离,以及信噪比。结果:对照组FB组、对照组RG组、BH RRB组、FB RRB组PET与CT解剖错配率分别为47.1%、27.5%、34.0%、16.7%。各组的平均错配距离分别为5.1±6.0、3.1±5.5、3.8±6.2和1.3±3.2 mm。此外,RRB改善了肝脏的信噪比。结论:RRB有效提高了PET与CT图像的配准。我们的方法具有成本效益,不仅在PET扫描期间,而且在CT扫描期间提供呼吸运动抑制。使用RRB与FB PET扫描被发现比呼吸门控更有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improvement of Anatomic Alignment and Image Quality Using a Respiratory Motion Reduction Block in Oncologic PET/CT.

18F-FDG PET/CT is crucial for cancer diagnosis; however, respiratory motion often causes misregistration between PET and CT images. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a custom-made respiratory motion reduction block (RRB) in reducing misregistration and improving image quality in 18F-FDG PET/CT. Methods: The RRB was developed to minimize the effects of respiratory motion. It is a pentagonal block made of Styrofoam designed to compress the upper abdomen. This study included 170 patients who underwent whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on the CT and PET scanning technique used: a control free-breathing (FB) group (breath-holding [BH] CT without RRB and respiration-gated [RG] PET), a control RG group (BH CT without RRB with RG PET), a BH RRB group (BH CT with RRB), and a FB RRB group (FB CT with RRB). Various parameters, including the incidence rate and distance of anatomic misregistration, and signal-to-noise ratio, were measured and compared. Results: For the control FB, control RG, BH RRB, and FB RRB groups, the incidence rates of anatomic misregistration between PET and CT images were 47.1%, 27.5%, 34.0%, and 16.7%, respectively. The mean misregistration distances in these groups were 5.1 ± 6.0, 3.1 ± 5.5, 3.8 ± 6.2, and 1.3 ± 3.2 mm, respectively. Furthermore, the RRB improved the signal-to-noise ratio of the liver. Conclusion: The RRB effectively improved registration between PET and CT images. Our approach is cost-effective and provides respiratory motion suppression not only during PET but also during CT scans. The use of RRB with FB PET scanning was found to be more beneficial than respiratory gating.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of nuclear medicine technology
Journal of nuclear medicine technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信